Tag Archives: secnav

Can the next SECNAV please just get the names right?

Just going to drop this little gem from DOD here:
 
The Department of Defense is honored by the Navy’s naming of two future Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carriers as the future USS William J. Clinton (CVN 82) and the future USS George W. Bush (CVN 83), as announced today by President Biden.
 
Can we please stop naming carriers after professional politicians and presidents?
 
Especially living presidents.
 
Especially these two guys.
 
Clinton all but destroyed the military while W carries the responsibility for taking the “war on terror” way too far in terms of conventional forces vs insurgents for pitifully little return except a lot of empty chairs around the table at Christmas and a National Guard left gutted. I mean at least if they would have used Jimmy Carter, that would be marginally understandable as at least he was a WWII USNA mid and early Nuclear Navy whiz kid in the Rickover days. But wait, we already have a submarine named after him…
 
Let’s just go back to the 1920s-70s practice of naming carriers via recycling historic warship names (Lexington, Yorktown, Saratoga, Ranger, Wasp, Hornet, Hancock, Oriskany, Essex, Kearsarge, Boxer, Ticonderoga, Kitty Hawk, etc.) with a long history and naval tradition to draw from. Wouldn’t it be great to tell the tale of these past ships and their battles at a commissioning ceremony rather than relate a canned anecdote on a former resident of the White House that is still controversial enough in modern memory that half the crowd is going to groan?
 
Sure, sure, the Navy made the obvious choice of naming CV-42 after FDR just after he died in office during wartime, and CV-67 after JFK under the same circumstances. But the rest probably shouldn’t have a carrier with the possible exception of the Mt. Rushmore presidents.
 
I mean, I like Ike as much as the next guy, but he was a Soldier. Name an Army Fort after him (which they only just did). Truman? Same story. Reagan? Come on. Stennis and Vinson? Are you kidding? George H.W. Bush at least was a naval aviator in WWII (and honorary submariner) but I’d wager he probably could have gotten a NAS or Field named after him with the same reverence. Plus now you will have TWO flattops named Bush, a tactical snafu waiting to happen that will linger for the next half-century. 
 
If a carrier has to be named for a person, why is there no USS Richard Halsey Best, whose dive bomber squadron sank two Japanese flattops on the same day during Midway? Best had to be medically retired that same year due to damage to his lungs caused by breathing bad O2 during the battle. His lungs never recovered entirely from that day. The smack talk and moto speeches of crewmembers of the USS Best writes itself. 
 
Or how about a flattop named for the Cajun “Lucky Pierre” Bordelon, the only U.S. Navy ace in the Korean War– who accomplished this feat in a piston-engine Corsair! He is also the only Navy “night ace,” earning all of his victories in darkness. A career Naval Aviator with 15,000 hours on his books and a former Eagle Scout with two Silver Stars and a Navy Cross to his credit, he is an all-American hero who has been forgotten by the Navy. 
 

The only U.S. Navy Korean fighter ace, Lt. Guy Bordelon, smiles at the nameplate on “Annie-Mo”, his Vought F4U-5N Corsair fighter in which he shot down five enemy aircraft during the Korean War. Bordelon was assigned to composite squadron VC-3 Blue Nemesis, which was deployed to Korea on the aircraft carrier USS Princeton (CVA-37) from 24 January to 21 September to Korea as part of Carrier Air Group 15 (CVG-15). 80-G-653594

 
And with that,

Let’s drag out the Navy Naming Convention Soapbox

Current Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro is on his way out with the change in administrations in Washington and, with all due respect to the office, it can’t come soon enough when it comes to naming conventions.

He has been grossly off-key from the typical conventions over the past four years.

Del Toro made the distinction that the upcoming first Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine, USS Columbia (SSBN 826), will not honor the previous 10 Columbias in current and past naval service but will specifically the first-named “District of Columbia,” which some have pointed out that is as another step in the plan to turn DC into the 51st state, but, hey…

In other submarine missteps– departing from 77th SECNAV Kenneth J. Braithwaite returned to traditional “fish” names for fleet submarines (or hunter killers in modern parlance), something the Navy did from 1931 through 1973. Hence, we will soon have USS Barb (SSN 804), Tang (SSN 805), Wahoo (SSN 806), and Silversides (SSN 807), all after the numerous esteemed fleet boats that previously carried those marine creatures’ names, and the country’s next frigate will take the name of one of the country’s original six frigates, USS Constellation— Del Toro named the future Virginia-class nuclear-powered attack submarine SSN-808 USS John H. Dalton, after Clinton’s hatchetman SECNAV. You know, the guy who snuffed out the Sprucans decades before their time, slaughtered the Navy’s cruiser and frigate force, and canceled the scheduled Service Life Extension Program on USS America (CV-66), forcing the mighty carrier to be decommissioned in 1996 and ultimately scuttled at sea rather than keeping her in the line through 2010 as previously planned.

Another Clinton SECNAV hatchet man will see his name on USS Richard J. Danzig (DDG-143), courtesy of Del Toro. Danzig’s only tie to the Navy was as its politically-appointed boss, and he was not a good one at that.

Dalton and Danzig, who were SECNAVs from July 22, 1993, to January 20, 2001, oversaw the destruction of the “600 Ship Navy” (which peaked at 594 warships in September 1987) managing the force’s constriction to just 316 vessels by the end of the Clinton era, a blow that the USN has been struggling to bounce back from for the past quarter century. There is zero reason for a new submarine and destroyer, built through billions of dollars in public treasure with the purpose of speeding into harm’s way, to be named for these guys.

Del Toro also ordered the Soviet-style, almost Orwellian memory holing, of the cruiser USS Chancellorsville— in the last few months of the ship’s life– to USS Robert Smalls (CG 62), which doesn’t do the latter naval hero any favors. In my opinion, as the Ticos are all named after battles, the cruiser should have gotten a more politically acceptable Virginia battle name such as USS The Wilderness or USS Fort Henry, and Smalls should have gotten a new destroyer to keep his name on the Navy List for more than just the self-serving span of Del Toro’s tour.

This month, in an effort to clear his desk while packing up the office, Del Toro has had a few hits and misses:

The future Bethesda-class expeditionary medical ship USNS Portsmouth (EMS 3) was announced during a ship naming ceremony at Naval Medical Center Portsmouth on Jan. 8. (Win)

The newest Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, the future USS Robert Kerrey (DDG 146), was named after the MoH recipient– the first Navy SEAL to be so honored– former Senator and former Nebraska governor. (Win)

The first two T-AGOS ocean surveillance ships of the Explorer class, the future USNS Don Walsh (T-AGOS 25) and the future USNS Victor Vescovo (T-AGOS 26), were named after esteemed Challenger Deep mariners. (Win)

Curiously, Del Toro also named the future San Antonio-class amphibious transport dock (LPD 33) USS Travis Manion after a Marine 1stLT who earned the Silver Star, posthumously, in Iraq. He announced this at an event with the Travis Manion Foundation. Yes, of course, Manion was a hero, but destroyers are and always have been named after heroes. LPDs, meanwhile, are all over the place with most named after cities while two– USS Richard M. McCool Jr. (LPD-29) and USS John P. Murtha (LPD-26), were named after heroes by Obama’s SECNAV, Ray Mabus.

In another break from the logic of a naming convention, Del Toro ordered that the future Constellation class frigate FFG-69 be named for Joy Bright Hancock, a director of WAVES. Yes, Hancock should have a ship named after her. Perhaps a destroyer in the same class as WWII nursing hero Lenah Sutcliffe Higbee (DDG 123) and computer pioneer RADM Grace Hopper (DDG 70). Especially when you consider all of the other Constellations are named for Revolutionary War heroes and vessels (Constellation, Congress, Chesapeake, Lafayette, Hamilton, and Galvez).

Further flipping the convention, Del Toro recently named the future DDG-145 as the fifth USS Intrepid! Surely the name would be better suited to a future LHD or carrier as the most famous “Big I” was the Essex class warrior flattop that served in WWII and Vietnam as well as provided service during the Space Race and has been a massive recruiting tool for the Navy in New York harbor for the past 50 years.

And I’m not getting into the rampant progressive politics of the John Lewis–class replenishment oilers, whose namesakes in almost all cases never served in the military and would probably be better remembered on postal stamps and the names of federal buildings. Oilers should be named for rivers, as they were for generations. These ships will be manned by overworked and underappreciated civilian mariners (CIVMARs) of which the MSC is in short supply, not budding law clerks and doe-eyed social activists. Heck, John Lewis got out of the peacetime (1961) draft claiming conscientious objector status!

And, hopefully, that’s the last time I will have to drag out this soapbox.

White House on Navy rate petition: Go pound sand

navy-rates-cover

As you may remember, there was a We The People/Change.org petition to halt the wholesale scrapping by SECNAV Ray “I hate the Navy” Mabus of the Navy’s 241-year rating system. 

It garnered more than 100,000 signatures and thus required a comment from the White House in response.

Repeated thus:

The Navy’s recent announcement about Navy Occupational Specialties has garnered attention from many veterans and supporters like you who cherish naval tradition.

This new classification system, which was produced by a comprehensive review led by the Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy and his senior enlisted leadership, moves toward occupational specialties titles similar to the other armed services. Modernizing this system provides many benefits within the Navy, such as increased flexibility in training and assignments. It also affords our Sailors opportunities when transitioning to the civilian workforce by aligning their specialties with civilian occupations.

This Administration believes that providing widely-recognized credentials will improve service members’ chances of success in the private sector. Improving hiring opportunities for veterans remains a high priority for this Administration, embodied in efforts such as the First Lady and Dr. Biden’s “Joining Forces” initiative.

Organizational changes that require a cultural shift can cause friction during transition periods, but the President has confidence in the decisions made by U.S. Navy leaders and agrees that the benefits in future years will outweigh growing pains in the next several months. Whether one’s Navy career occurred under the former rating structure or today’s modernized system, the President maintains his steadfast pride in Sailors who have sacrificed and worked hard to serve with distinction.

On the bright side the /sarc/ Duffleblog is reporting the Coast Guard will now receive all the leftover and unused rates.

“Turning over the rates is bittersweet. They have served as a long and distinguished tradition within the U.S. Navy with much good work done in terms of pride in one’s rate. And I know that it means a lot for us to know that it will be in the service of the Coast Guard in continuing the custom of creating weird and obscure rates with painfully specific job titles,” Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy Mike Steven said.

Bring back those beautiful rates!

130924-N-XZ912-002 MEDITERRANEAN SEA (Sept. 24, 2013) – Gunners Mate 3rd Class Amelia Sandoval, left, and Gunners Mate 2nd Class Samuel Ervin perform maintenance on a torpedo tube aboard the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Barry (DDG 52). Barry, homeported in Norfolk, Va., is currently on a scheduled deployment supporting maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the 6th Fleet area of operations. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Christopher B. Stoltz)

MEDITERRANEAN SEA (Sept. 24, 2013) – Gunners Mate 3rd Class Amelia Sandoval, left, and Gunners Mate 2nd Class Samuel Ervin perform maintenance on a torpedo tube aboard the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Barry (DDG 52). Barry, homeported in Norfolk, Va., is currently on a scheduled deployment supporting maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the 6th Fleet area of operations. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Christopher B. Stoltz)

Just in case you didn’t know, there is a Change.org petition to halt the scrapping by Ray Mabus of the Navy’s longstanding rating system.

For 241 Years Navy personnel have been identified by their Job specialty, known as a “Rating”. The oldest rates such as Boatswain Mates, and Gunners Mate predate the founding of this country. Being known by your job title was a sense of pride. A sign of accomplishment. The Secretary of the Navy and Chief of Naval Operations just senselessly erased this tradition. One only has to visit Navy social media pages to see the disgust and outrage of current and former personnel. One by one current leadership continues to erode the very things that set the Navy apart from the other services. Mr. President, I and the others signing this petition request you use your authority to restore to our Sailors what they have earned.

Click here if you want to see, sign or share.