Tag Archives: FF

Air Superiority, 1945 meets 2017

Official caption: To celebrate 70 years of air dominance, the United States Air Force showcased an array of aircraft at the 2017 Royal International Air Tattoo, July 16, 2017, at RAF Fairford, United Kingdom!

(U.S. Air Force photo by Tech. Sgt. Brian Kimball)

(U.S. Air Force photo by Tech. Sgt. Brian Kimball)

This shot is great, showing a Lockheed-Martin F-22 Raptor keeping pace with a North American P-51 Mustang, the Cadillac of the sky.

The P-51 is made up to match Inglewood-made P-51D-5-NA, #44-13318, “Frenesi” flown by USAAF ace Lt. Col. Thomas L. Hayes, Jr. of the 357th Fighter Group, and is complete with 84 bomb marks, each indicating a completed ground attack mission rather than a bomb strike, as well as two Japanese kill marks and nine German ones.

In actuality, she is a late-production Dallas-made P-51/F-51K (P-51D with a different propeller, widely exported postwar) SN 44-12852, FAA N357FG, a former air racer and Dominican Air Force fighter recently very nicely restored by Dan Friedkin and the crew at Midwest Aero Restorations, Danville IL. She is one of only 1,500 or so Mustang-Ks made.

The F-22A is a late-model Block 35 bird, SN 09-4180, delivered in 2009, and active with the 27th FS/1st Fighter Wing, Langley AFB, and has no mission marks as of yet. She is one of only 195 made, though production only halted on her line in 2012.

Saudis go big on LCS, err, make that FFG

Details of the $11 billion (with a B) Saudi Naval Expansion Program II (SNEP II) are trickling out and it looks like the big spender of the Persian Gulf is looking to get 4 (maybe 5 judging from the number of weapons systems) of Lockheed’s Freedom-class LCS hulls– only with real teeth.

Can you guess which variant is closer to what we will have as the next FF over what the Saudi FFG will likely look like?

Can you guess which variant is closer to what we will have as the next FF over what the Saudi FFG will likely look like?

Rather than be marginal and modular, the Saudis are going for a 76mm Oto Melara MK-75 gun over the 57mm Mk110, adding two 8-cell VLS MK41s (which can also launch Standard missiles) for quad packed Enhanced Sea Sparrows (giving each ship 64 of these missiles, of which the Saudis are buying more than 500), 128 RIM-116C Block II Rolling Airframe Missiles for five MK-15 Mod 3 SeaRAM air defense systems and 48 Block II Harpoon anti-ship missiles along with eight quad launchers and five control systems.

Sure Harpoon is dated, but its all we are selling right now and is still good enough to smoke anything the Iranians have afloat– plus Sea Sparrows and SeaRam have a surface-to-surface mode which means they can put the hard goodbye on small craft as needed. To deal with sneaky subs, they will also have anti-submarine warfare (ASW) sonar suites and torpedoes.

Also in the package are 10 MH-60Rs.

Overall, the LCS when so equipped looks like a decent little guided missile frigate and a worthy successor to the old Perry class. Hopefully the USN will take an interest.

That reminds me of the time…

It shouldn’t be surprising that a Persian Gulf state picked up a fully-fleshed naval combatant from the U.S. while the Navy looks on with a sigh. The same thing happened in the late 1970s.

In 1978, Ingalls Shipbuilding laid down His Iranian Majesty’s Ship Kouroush, a 9,700-ton variant of the Spruance-class destroyer, which Ingalls was also cranking out. However instead of the modest arms of the Spru-can, Kouroush had a pair of Mk 26 missile launchers for the Standard Missile SM-2MR with magazines for 80 missiles– making it one of the best DDGs in the world. Basically, a Ticonderoga-class cruiser but without the Aegis system.

Well Kouroush and her three sisters, Daryush, Nader, and Anoshirvan never made it to the Shah’s Navy, being embargoed after the Ayatollah came to power.

Instead the USN picked them up for a bargain and commissioned them as USS Kidd (DDG-993), Callaghan, Scott and Chandler and they served through the 80s and 90s (often, ironically, in the Persian Gulf).

USS Kidd (ex-Kouroush, now-Tso Ying), also known as "What the Spruance class should have been"

USS Kidd (ex-Kouroush, now-Tso Ying), also known as “What the Spruance class should have been”

Taiwan picked them up in 2005 as Tso Ying, Su Ao, Kee Lung, and Ma Kong respectively where they continue to serve, their Standard missiles replaced with the locally made Tien Kung (Sky Bow) system.

Goodbye LCS, hello Fast Frigate

A coupled weeks ago I ran a post on the new up-gunned LCS that the Navy is considering to fill the shoes of the retiring OHP FFG-7 class frigates and at the time wondered, “Hey, why dont they just call them frigates instead of LCS 2.0, or the then-official Small Surface Combatant?”

Well I guess other people had the same idea.

According to the USNI the modified LCS class will be designated as frigates, Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus announced on Thursday at the Surface Navy Association 2015 symposium on Thursday.

“One of the requirements of the Small Surface Combatant Task Force was to have a ship with frigate-like capabilities. Well, if it’s like a frigate, Let’s call it a frigate?” Mabus said. “We are going to change the hull designation of the LCS class ships to FF. It will still be the same ship, the same program of record, just with an appropriate and traditional name.”

An LCS by any other name...

An LCS by any other name…

The new class will be designated ‘fast frigates’ which historically had the old “FF” hull number prefix. The last fast frigates in the Navy were the old 1970s era Knox-class steam powered ships, the final hull of which, USS Moinester (FF-1097) was decommissioned from U.S. Naval service on 28 July 1994, just shy of her 20th birthday.

With that ship in mind, should the navy keep the same numbering sequence, the new frigates should pick up with hull number FF-1099.

Why not 1098? Well in 1979 the 15-year old research ship USS Glover (AGDE-1) was re designated FF-1098 in 1979 and reclassified formally as a frigate.

Now these supped up LCS’s are still woefully under armed, but hey the FFG-7 class that they are replacing only has a CIWS, a 25mm gun, a 76mm mount, and torpedoes, so its really kind of a apples to crab-apples type of thing.

And I would like to go on record that, as fitting frigates, they should also be named traditionally after naval heroes too, rather than politicians and cities, but that’s a whole different cup of coffee there…