The Harrier Carrier. It’s still a thing
When the Harrier jump jet became a real thing in the late 1960s, the Hawker Siddeley Harrier GR.1/GR.3 and the AV-8A were seen as being able to fight from primitive forward operating bases on the battlefield and help blunt the Soviet tank force should they come across the Fulda Gap or over the top into Norway (or for the Brits, against the Guatemalans in Belize or Argies in the Falklands).
However, the benefit of using these V/STOL strike craft on abbreviated aircraft carriers without the need for catapults or arresting gear was soon evident.
In fact, it was tested out before the aircraft was even put into production.
In 1974, the Marines began the first shipboard trials on the helicopter assault ship USS Guam and two years later 14 AV-8A Harriers from Marine Attack Squadron 231 (VMA-231) “Ace of Spades” embarked aboard the USS Franklin D. Roosevelt (CV-42) from 1976 to 1977 to prove the concept of integrating the short takeoff and vertical landing (STOVL) Harrier into catapult and barrier configured carrier’s normal Air Wing operations.
Chief of Naval Operations Elmo Zumwalt backed the concept of a cheaply built 13,000-ton Sea Control Ship that could be filled with a couple dozen Harriers and Sea King ASW helicopters at about the same time. Basically a 1970s update to the Jeep Carriers of WWII.
Heck, Zumwalt even wanted Harrier optimized Spruance-class destroyers in several different flavors, none of which ever got past the drawing board.
As well as a modern battlecruiser based on a nuclear powered Virginia-class hull stretched to form an aviation capable “Strike Cruiser” that could accommodate 6 Harriers and 4 Sea Sprites/Hawks along with a full weapons suite.
Harriers on everything!
Even though Zum was replaced and a lot of his ideas (including building 100+ Pegasus-class hydrofoil missile boats!) went with him, the Harrier Carrier concept was growing.
In 1977, the Spanish Armada placed an order for a 15,000-ton ship based on Zumwalt’s concept which was commissioned in 1982 as Príncipe de Asturias capable of carrying 29 fixed-wing Harriers (“Matadors” in Spanish service) and rotary-wing aircraft. A larger 26,000-ton ship optimized for amphibious warfare, Juan Carlos I, was ordered in 2003.
The Royal Navy converted their last legacy carrier, HMS Hermes, with a 12-degree ski jump to help with rolling take-offs of the new Sea Harrier FRS.1 in 1980 while they ordered three specifically designed “carrier cruisers” as they were described at the time, the first of which, HMS Invincible, was commissioned 11 July 1980.
The British Harrier carriers proved able to do the job in a pinch (see= Falkand Islands).
For further example, in September 1995, just eight FA.2 Sea Harriers from 800 NAS aboard HMS Invincible commenced operations over Serb-held positions in Sarajevo. Over the next ten days, they flew 24 bombing sorties, 42 combat air patrols, and 28 reconnaissance missions, for a sortie rate of 11.75 flights per day, every day for a week and a half, with just eight airframes.
Then came others
India began operating its INS Vikrant with Sea Harriers in 1983 later joined by the retired Hermes (as INS Viraat).
The 13,000-ton Italian aircraft carrier Giuseppe Garibaldi (551) came off the ways in 1985, picked up her first Harriers in 1991, and was joined by the nearly twice as large Cavour in 2009.
Thailand’s 11,000-ton HTMS Chakri Naruebet, based on the final U.S. Navy blueprints for a dedicated sea control ship but with the addition of a ski-jump ramp, was commissioned in 1997– flying a handful of Spanish surplus AV-8S Matadors.
Plus of course, all five Tarawa-class and eight Wasp-class LHA/LHDs of the U.S. Navy were designed so they could operate as dedicated Sea Control Ships when needed. This was validated when some 20 AV-8Bs of VMA-331 operated from USS Nassau (LHA-4) in support of Operation Desert Storm, flying 240 combat sorties and dropping 900 bombs.
In all, between May 1976 when USS Tarawa (LHA-1) was commissioned and 2005 when Invincible was taken out of service, no less than 22 Harrier Carriers or their equivalents were built, converted, or building for six navies around the world.
That was the peak.
Since then those numbers have been trimmed as all of the Invincibles and Tarawas, Vikrant and Hermes/Viraat, as well as Príncipe de Asturias, have been decommissioned. Currently, there are but 13 hulls afloat designed to operate these aircraft, which themselves are dwindling and are getting smaller in number every week.
The Harrier was withdrawn from both RN and Thai service in 2006.
The Indians hung up their last jump jet this May.
The Italians still have 16 operational AV-8B/TAV-8Bs they operate from their two carriers and they are very active. For instance, 8 Italian Harriers flying from Garibaldi dropped 160 guided bombs during 1221 flight hours over Libya in 2011.
The Spanish have 13 EAV-8B+/TAV-8Bs capable of operations from Juan Carlos I, though maintenance on these older aircraft is reportedly a problem.
The 2016 Marine Aviation Plan carries 84 AV-8Bs airframes to produce 66 RBA Harriers in 6 operational and one replacement squadron. This is to reduce to 80 aircraft/5 operational squadrons in FY17, 64/4 by FY21, 48/3 in FY22, 32/2 in FY23, 16/1 in FY24 and drop altogether by FY27.
USMC Harriers will be replaced by the F-35C, in theory, by then for which the new LHA-6 class ships will be optimized for.
But speaking of Marine AV-8Bs from their dedicated sea control/amphib ships, they are still getting the job done.
Withness this video last week from USS Boxer (LHD-4) with Harriers of VMA-214 (Blacksheep) assigned to the 13th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU), launching missions in support of Operation Inherent Resolve, joining strike aircraft operating from USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) in the Mediterranean Sea.
“These missions from the flight decks of USS Boxer, like those from the USS Harry S. Truman, demonstrate the inherent flexibility of naval forces,” said Vice Adm. Kevin Donegan, commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command.
“Today, U.S. naval forces are striking ISIL simultaneously from both the Mediterranean and the Arabian Gulf. Of course, the engine of this effort is our nation’s Sailors and Marines serving with the USS Boxer Amphibious Ready Group and the 13th Marine Expeditionary Unit; they, together with our joint and coalition partners, are dismantling and rolling back terrorist networks in Syria, Iraq and elsewhere,” said Donegan.
Here are some beautiful shots of AV-8Bs aboard Boxer.
Just keeping it real.
I was assigned as SR. Medical Dept. Rep. on the USS FLETCHER (DD-992) ’81 to ’84. Seeing the hull of the Spruance class modified like that was pretty weird! It was a good ship. She now is a reef off the coast of Hawaii…..
The harrier carrier lives on in what is probably its greatest expression yet – the Queen Elizabeth class carriers, sometimes known as CVF. So it’s not dead, but if you consider part of the defining characteristic of a harrier carrier to be small and cheap, then CVF doesn’t really qualify.
The Invincible class were originally conceived as ASW-focused helicopter carriers designed to operate in the Greenland-Iceland-UK gap. They would provide ASW Seakings to back up the efforts of the RN’s submarines and frigates as they struggled to hold back the swarms of Soviet subs. During this time the CVA-01 large deck conventional carriers were being planned. But the scent of their demise was already on the wind so that,with the advent of the P1127 ‘Kestrel’, the RN spotted an opportunity to retain fixed wing aviation in an altered form. This was when the Invincible class helicopter carriers/aviation cruisers were evolved. But the new design could not be pitched as an aircraft carrier, because that was politically untenable in the wake of the cancellation of CVA-01. So they were termed ‘through-deck cruisers’ which made them appear similar in concept to Zumwalt’s harrier carrier Spruance, or the Soviet’s Kiev class: i.e. not aircraft carriers, but conventionally armed cruisers (with guns and missiles) that could also launch some aircraft. And thus, they slipped under the political radar.
There were several other fascinating suggestions for using harriers, including deploying them from the RN’s smaller frigates. These involved the use of harriers with their landing gear removed to save weight. They were launched from trolleys up a very short ramp, and were recovered in mid-air using a sky hook attached to a crane, which then manoeuvred them into the hangar bay and sat them down on a trolley. Three or four aircraft could be accommodated, but there were some obvious problems. One was the removal of the ability of the aircraft to land on a conventional runway (rubber landing mats were being trialled at the time – the harrier would belly flop from a hover! Unsurprisingly, this idea was not pursued). The other was the enormous impact on the mothership’s ability to embark weapons and sensors, the increased manpower requirements and the concomitant reduction in unsupplied endurance in terms of fuel and stores. The tactical advantage gained from four Harriers was not considered sufficient compensation for creating a very bad warship.
A Google image search will provide numerous diagrams and images of the proposed concept:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=harrier+skyhook&biw=1536&bih=701&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwiKypiql8PNAhVED8AKHXsGAsIQ_AUIBigB#imgrc=g9wJmBL0A0-a_M%3A
Pingback: Warship Wednesday July 20, 2016: The Majestic, if unlucky, Aussie flattop | laststandonzombieisland
Pingback: ‘Rusty Lusty’ sold for scrap instead of being used as museum | laststandonzombieisland
Pingback: The final ride of the Illustrious | laststandonzombieisland
Pingback: It Only Took the Royal Navy 37 Years to Come Full Circle | laststandonzombieisland
Pingback: A Look at the Biggest Royal Navy Deployment in at least 10 Years | laststandonzombieisland
Pingback: RN Flattops Echo History in the Med | laststandonzombieisland
Pingback: Italy Finally has an Aircraft Carrier | laststandonzombieisland
Pingback: Budget Flattops of Opportunity: Entering the Age of the Drone Carrier | laststandonzombieisland
“HMS Illustrious, an Invincible-class Britsh Harrier Carrier with a Sea Harrier lifting off her ski jump”(sic)
That’s a Harrier II pictured not a SHAR.
“USMC Harriers will be replaced by the F-35C, in theory, by then for which the new LHA-6 class ships will be optimized for.”(sic)
AV-8Bs are being replaced by F-35Bs. F/A-18s that are part of the TACAIR Integration Plan – four squadrons – are being replaced by F-35Cs. Amphibious assault ships – LHAs/LHDs – are incapable of operating the F-35C. Only Bs will embark aboard those boats.