Aussie Spec Ops WO1 weighs in on the new and improved EF88

Australia went against the Commonwealth grain when they ditched the then-standard FN FAL (L1A1 semiauto) pattern SLR (and some M16s) for the Austrian Steyr in the 1980s, naming the rifle the F88 Austeyr as they were built under license at the Thales Lithgow Small Arms Factory. Now, after an extensive redesign that has produced the EF88 with lots of new upgrades (rails, internals, ergonomics, etc), the Australians are set to keep the Steyr for generations longer while Australia’s closest ally, the U.S., rock the M4/M16.

EF88 steyr aug australian

Some of the troops down in Oz think that’s a mistake. From ASPI:

I am a senior warrant officer who has been fortunate to serve in an Australian Special Forces unit for over 25 years, including more than 13 years in combat roles, and, most recently, as head of my unit’s combat and firearms training program. I’m writing this because I respectfully disagree with John Coyne’s recent assessment that the EF88 (the designation of the rifle in Australian Army service, not ‘F90’ which refers to Thales’ export version) ‘seems to make perfect sense’, when compared to the M4/AR-15.

I’ve had the opportunity to fire the EF88 and while it’s an improvement on the current Steyr, it’s definitely not a good combat weapon. The Steyr has many aspects that are less than desirable—some I will discuss below—but I’ll acknowledge that for the majority of the Australian Defence Force, it’s adequate for self defence. However, for our combat soldiers (not just Special Forces) we could do a great deal better.

More here

Successful Disco-era U-boats

Germany has spent something like 120~ years making top-notch submarines. In fact, other than the 80 or so Romeo/Ming class diesels operated by the Chinese and the Norks, the most numerous modern submersible operated in the world are the 61 German-made Type 209 class submarines built and commissioned between 1971 and 2008.

However, if it wasn’t for the earlier Type 206 design, there never would have been a 209.

Designed in 1964 by Ingenieur Kontor Lübeck (IKL), these cute little 159-foot diesel-electric boats weighed but 500-tons at full load when submerged. However, they could stay at sea, floating in as little as 16 feet of water when surfaced and hiding in 10 fathoms when submerged if needed, for over a month.

type_206a_34_of_44

Further, they carried 8 modern 533mm torpedoes which could be delivered all at once, allowing them the capability to sink virtually any warship found at sea–to include a Soviet battlecruiser– with a single salvo.

11uboot_typ_206a_ostsee

Some 18 were built for the Bundesmarine (West German Navy), numbered U13-U30, commissioning between April 1973 and March 1975, just under two years, which isn’t bad. Had the balloon ever gone up in the Cold War, these hardy craft would likely have given the Soviets, East Germans and Poles a lot of hell in the Baltic.

They were so nice, in fact, that the Israelis ordered three slightly modded variants they termed the Gal-class as a follow-on, which were delivered in 1976-77.

gal_g gal_2 gal
Further, another 15 very similar (535-ton/155-foot) Type 207s were built as the Kobben class for the Royal Norwegian Navy by 1966 and have gone on to serve not only that fleet but the Danes and Poles as well (the latter of which still have five of these in service) proving the design still holds water after a half-century.

The Germans kept their 18 Type 206’s in service for over 30 years in some cases, decommissioning the last four in 2011 while the Israelis did more or less the same.

In all, the 36 boats of the Type 206/207/Gal design did what they were intended to for their respective users and have gone on to live a second life to a degree. Indonesia looked to pick up as many as five, but then backpedaled, while the Germans shopped both the Type 206s and the surplus Gal-class vessels for a while.

HN-INS-Gal-2

Gal herself is now on display at the Israeli Naval museum in Haifa while two (the recently retired U15 and U17) are laid up in Germany and four have gone on to Columbia. Two, ex-U16 and ex-U18, were sold as spare parts hulks while another pair, U23 and U24 were given length (2012-2015) refits in Germany and shipped to Colombia as the ARC Intrepido and ARC Indomable respectively to begin their new careers.

Two German Type-206 submarines outbound from Kiel to Columbia, 2015.

Two German Type-206 submarines outbound from Kiel to Columbia, 2015.

After all, even at age 40, they are still effective.

Paraguay is putting their 75 year old Shermans back on line

fury shermans

As noted by War is Boring, Paraguay is putting World War II-era M3 Stuarts and M4 Sherman tanks back into service. The country is thought to have three Sherman medium tanks and up to 14 Stuart light tanks in its inventory.

The venerable tanks — which are now over 75 years old — were originally designed to fight the German Wehrmacht and Waffen-SS in Europe. Neither tank proved to be a match for the Nazi Panzers on a one-for-one basis. But the combined Allied effort prevailed, and the Sherman would nonetheless continue to serve around the world for decades to come.

Now, apparently into their second century as well.

More here

Sometimes the pen IS mightier that the sword

Ian over at Forgotten Weapons put this out on the Stinger Pen Gun a while back and I thought it was really neat-o.

Enjoy!

So Ruger just got in the quiet game

Following in the footsteps of arms makers such as Barrett and Sig, Ruger dropped their first branded suppressor today.

ruger sr suppressor

With a  5.37″ length, 1.06″ diameter and 6.3 ounce weight, the Silent-SR is a pretty neat looking 1/2″-28TPI mount can that reduces sound pressure levels of .22 LR, .22 WMR and .17 HMR pistols and rifles by up to 40 dB, which isn’t bad.

Here is Ruger’s spec sheet on it.

Can you tell SHOT Show is in two weeks?

The rest of the wolf pack story

The truth behind this photo, taken in 2011:

wolf pack 2

“A massive pack of 25 timber wolves hunting bison on the Arctic circle in northern Canada. In mid-winter in Wood Buffalo National Park temperatures hover around -40C. The wolf pack, led by the alpha female, travel single-file through the deep snow to save energy. The size of the pack is a sign of how rich their prey base is during winter when the bison are more restricted by poor feeding and deep snow. The wolf packs in this National Park are the only wolves in the world that specialize in hunting bison ten times their size. They have grown to be the largest and most powerful wolves on earth.”

Photograph: Chadden Hunter/BBC NHU

Contrary to the viral post that have circled the globe in the past few weeks that inaccurately says:

“A wolf pack: the first 3 are the old or sick, they give the pace to the entire pack. If it was the other way round, they would be left behind, losing contact with the pack. In case of an ambush they would be sacrificed. Then come 5 strong ones, the front line. In the center are the rest of the pack members, then the 5 strongest following. Last is alone, the alpha. He controls everything from the rear. In that position he can see everything, decide the direction. He sees all of the pack. The pack moves according to the elders pace and help each other, watch each other.”

the more you know

 

Warship Wednesday January 6, 2016: The wandering Italian of Montevideo

Here at LSOZI, we are going to take off every Wednesday for a look at the old steam/diesel navies of the 1859-1946 time period and will profile a different ship each week. These ships have a life, a tale all of their own, which sometimes takes them to the strangest places. – Christopher Eger

Warship Wednesday, January 6, 2016: The wandering Italian of Montevideo

Montevideo

Here we see the Hellenic Navy’s one-of-a-kind protected cruiser Salamis, err, make that the Regina Marina’s cruiser (ariete torpediniere) Admiral Angelo Emo, or is it Dogali, or is it the Uruguayan Navy’s ROU 25 de Agosto?

Well, about that…

Designed by British naval architect Sir William Henry White, who served as Chief Constructor at the Admiralty, the ship was in good company. Sir William came up with the plans for the Royal Sovereign-class and King Edward VII-class battleships, the royal yacht HMY Victoria and Albert III, and the liner RMS Mauretania among his designs for 43 battleships, 26 armored cruisers, 102 protected cruisers, and 74 unarmored warships. Suffice to say, Sir William knew a thing or three about cranking out a decent ship.

Salamis (“ΣΑΛΑΜΙΣ”), a 2260-ton warship of 266-feet in length, carried an impressive half-dozen good Armstrong 15 cm (5.9 in) L/40 guns single mounts with two side by side forward, two astern, and one amidships on each broadside– and was the only such ship to carry these particular guns. Further, making a very sporty 19.66 knots on trials, she was among the fastest major warship in any fleet on that day.

Ordered for the Hellenic Navy on 12 February 1884 at Armstrong Whitworth in Elswick (BuNo.482), she was laid down the next year. She was contracted under the government of Prime Minister Charilaos Trikoupis who, with tensions brewing with the Ottomans that were lead to war in 1897, was keen on beefing up the Greek Navy. However, when Trikoupis was ushered out of office in May of that year, the new government of Theodoros Deligiannis, not so keen on buying new warships, canceled the contract for Salamis while still on the builder’s ways and Armstrong promptly offered her to Turkey!

(*Trikoupis would return to power and in 1889 buy the new battleships Hydra, Spetsai, and Psara from France, but that’s another story.)

Luckily for the Greeks, the Turkish sale fell through and the Kingdom of Italy, who intended to name her Angelo Emo after the 18th century Grand Admiral of the Republic of Venice and launched her as such, purchased the clearance sale cruiser on 12 February 1887.

The Italian Regina Marina nonetheless commissioned their new cruiser on 28 April 1887 with– instead of Emo’s name– the monicker Dogali to commemorate the slaughter of Colonel Tommaso De Cristoforis’ 500-man battalion by Ras Alula Engida’s 7,000 Ethiopian troops near Massawa in what is now Eritrea in January of that year. This produced the oddity of naming her after a stunning Italian defeat chalked up there with such colonial shellackings as the Battle of Isandlwana (see, Zulu Dawn) and Adwa (like Dogali but way, way worse for the Italians).

Michele Cammarano's painting depicts the Battle of Dogali on January 26, 1887. It didn't go well for the Italians.

Michele Cammarano’s painting depicts the Battle of Dogali on January 26, 1887, with Colonel Tommaso De Cristoforis, with his distinctive black mustache, shown in the fray. It didn’t go well for the Italians.

Serving first with the First Squadron, then after 1897 with the Cruiser Squadron, Dogali was a happy ship despite her namesake and, with her relatively long sea legs (capable of over 4,000 nm range at 10 knots), ventured to the U.S. for the 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition where she was reviewed along with the other Italian cruisers Etna and Giovanni Bausan in the Hudson, then down to Rio where she stood by in an international armada to protect Italian citizens during a revolt there.

Dogali-1887

As a training ship for the Italian Navy, Dogali spent most of her career on cruises for naval cadets.

Continuing her overseas work, she waved the flag in the Pacific, spending a few wild nights in Vancouver and later the Gulf of Mexico where her crew enjoyed New Orleans and Pensacola. Again, she visited New York in 1897 for the occasion of the unveiling of Grant’s Tomb.

In 1902, during the Venezuela Crisis, Dogali sailed up the Amazon to Santa Fe in Peru accompanied by the German cruiser SMS Falke (at the time Italy, Germany, and Austria were allies).

909_001

In 1908, with her unique power plant and armament something of a logistical sore thumb to the Italians, and with a looming refit on her 20-year old high-mileage machinery, Rome approached Peru for a possible sale which fell through then, in the end, sold her off to the Armada Nacional del Uruguay, who commissioned her first as República Oriental del Uruguay’s 25 de Agosto after the date of the country’s independence from Spain and then later as ROU Montevideo after the capital– though she never did get that refit.

In later life, she sported a white scheme

In later life, she sported a white scheme

At over 2,000-tons and mounting 6×5.9-inchers, she far eclipsed anything the Uruguayan navy had ever owned and was part of the tiny service’s early 20th Century naval build-up that included the armed steamer Vanguardia, the brand-new 1,400-ton German-built gunboat Uruguay (2×4.7-inch guns), and the dispatch boat Oriental.

The problem was, there just weren’t enough seasoned jacks and officers (the Uruguayan naval academy was only just founded in 1907) to man all these ships.

Before the big (for Uruguay) Italian cruiser joining the fleet, the largest ship the Armada had ever operated was the elderly 127-foot French-built wooden gunboat General Suárez (ex-Tactique) which had locomotive boilers and a crew of just 65 officers and rates. To jump from that to a cruiser that required a crew of over 200 to make way was a stretch.

With the addition of the ex-Dogali to the fleet, the Uruguayans discarded Suarez as well as the old Austrian-built gunboat General Artigas (300-tons) and the German-built armed merchant steamer Malvinas (400-tons) while transferring the paddle-wheel river gunboat Barón de Río Branco (300-tons) to the Ministry of the Interior– then took all of their crews and piled them up on the much larger new ship. Talk about Brady Bunch.

With that in mind, after 1910, when the new and less labor-intensive ROU Uruguay arrived from Germany, our aging cruiser Montevideo rarely left port. ROU Uruguay did most of the “at sea” work for the Armada after that date (and they only got rid of this relic from Imperial Germany in 1962!)

Uruguayan Protected Cruiser Montevideo pictured in 1917. She was largely a fleet in being for several years. 

A different view of the same from above

Montevideo remained as a “fleet in being” for another two decades at her dock, still flying the flag and giving and receiving salutes, though largely unmanned.

In 1912, while on a short sea cruise Montevideo nearly foundered near the Brazilian coast and had to be towed back, an ignoble fate for a once-proud vessel.

In 1914, Montevideo was disarmed and served as a stationary training and receiving ship (crucero escuela) for the Armada.

During World War I, Uruguay sided against Germany and broke off diplomatic relations, though never entered the war, thus ensuring our elderly cruiser had very limited use during the Great War that ensnared all of her former officials and potential owners and builders up to that time.

Finally, in 1932 she was sold for scrap at age 45, to make room at the wayside for three new 180-ton gunboats and a three-masted sail-training/survey ship which better suited the nation’s needs.

Her service to Uruguay is commemorated in several postage stamps in that country, after all, she was the fleet flag for over 20 years, though usually flew it in port only.

Her service to Uruguay is commemorated in several postage stamps in that country, after all, she was the fleet flag for over 20 years, though usually flew it in port only.

Montevideo would arguably be the most powerful warship to ever sail under the flag of Uruguay and was the only cruiser ever operated by that country. And after all, in a fleet with no battleships or carriers, the cruiser is king!

Montevideo was also the largest Uruguayan naval ship until the Armada picked up a pre-owned trio of 1960s-era Commandant Rivière-class sloops (frigates) from France (2,230-tons/321-feet oal/ 3×4-inch guns) at the end of the Cold War, which in turn replaced a pair of smaller WWII-era Cannon-class destroyer escorts. While the old cruiser has a few tons on these craft, they are some 60+ feet longer.

As a note, just two of the trio of French frigates remain in some sort of nominal service, and one of these, the former Admiral Charner (F727) has carried the name ROU Montevideo (F3) since 1991, keeping our subject’s memory alive.

040616-N-8148A-047 South Pacific Ocean (June 16, 2004) Ð An SH-60F Seahawk assigned to the ÒIndiansÓ of Helicopter Anti-Submarine Squadron Six (HS-6) flies past the Uruguayan Naval Frigate, Montevideo. HS-6 is embarked on USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76), which is currently circumnavigating South America to her new homeport of San Diego, Calif. U.S. Navy photo by PhotographerÕs Mate 3rd Class Kitt Amaritnant (RELEASED)

040616-N-8148A-047 South Pacific Ocean (June 16, 2004) Ð An SH-60F Seahawk assigned to the “Indians” of Helicopter Anti-Submarine Squadron Six (HS-6) flies past the Uruguayan Naval Frigate, Montevideo. HS-6 is embarked on USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76), which is currently circumnavigating South America to her new homeport of San Diego, Calif. U.S. Navy photo by Photographer’s Mate 3rd Class Kitt Amaritnant (RELEASED)

Specs:

rn-dogali-1899-cruiser
Displacement: 2,050 t (2,020 long tons; 2,260 short tons)
Length: 76.2 m (250 ft.) waterline, 266.75 oal.
Beam: 11.28 m (37.0 ft.)
Draft: 4.42 m (14.5 ft.)
Propulsion: 2-shaft triple expansion engines 7197 shp.
Speed: 17.68 knots (32.74 km/h; 20.35 mph)
Range: 4,000 nmi (7,400 km; 4,600 mi) at 10 knots (19 km/h; 12 mph) with 430 tons of coal
Complement: 12 officers 232 crew, though in Italian service was more and in Uruguayan much less.
Armament: (most removed 1914)
6 × 152mm (5.9 in) L/40 guns
9 × 57 mm (2.2 in) guns
6 × Gatling guns
4 × 356 mm (14.0 in) torpedo tubes
1 75mm gun added 1898.
Armor:
Deck: 50 mm (2.0 in)
Conning tower: 50 mm
Gun shields: 110 mm (4.3 in)

If you liked this column, please consider joining the International Naval Research Organization (INRO), Publishers of Warship International

They are possibly one of the best sources of naval study, images, and fellowship you can find http://www.warship.org/membership.htm

The International Naval Research Organization is a non-profit corporation dedicated to the encouragement of the study of naval vessels and their histories, principally in the era of iron and steel warships (about 1860 to date). Its purpose is to provide information and a means of contact for those interested in warships.

Nearing their 50th Anniversary, Warship International, the written tome of the INRO has published hundreds of articles, most of which are unique in their sweep and subject.

PRINT still has its place. If you LOVE warships you should belong.

I am a member, so should you be!

Are new MOS models of Glock 9mms coming soon?

It would appear that a few new offerings for Glock’s MOS (Modular Optics System) for mounting reflex and red dot sights are in the pipeline, namely for the G17 and G19 models.

The current line up

The current line up

The MOS system made its debut at SHOT Show 2015 exactly a year ago and provides factory-original optics ready handguns in a number of models.  The MOS feature is currently available on four 4th Gen Glock models including the “Practical/Tactical” G34, G35, G41 and the new for 2015 10mm G40 long slide.

The G40 10mm with MOS optics mount

The G40 10mm with MOS optics mount

The MOS allows a user to mount a red-dot or other optic switching from sight to sight by using a series of adapter plates that are accepted into the common mount on the slide. The four different plate options work with EoTech, Docter, Insight, Meopta, Trijicon (RMR), C-More, and Leupold (Delta) among others.

Now, as reported by The Firearms Blog, there are three new sku’s showing up for Glock distributors, 0252744 0252743, and 0252742, each denoting MOS variants of the Glock 17 and Glock 19. If you ask me, the two G17s are likely for the standard length model and a 17L, which would make sense.

Apparently these guns have been available in Europe for some time. TFB says since April of this year. This is verified by the Munich, Germany based Waffen-Centrale.de who is advertising MOS G17s (with the four-pack of plates) for 819 Euros.

Glock17MOS_zps2b0s89fx

They are already starting to show up online with retailers here in the states ($598 on sale) for a Glock 19 Gen 4 MOS 9mm 15 RDS 4.02″ so you can expect this to get firmed up quick at the upcoming SHOT Show 2016 in just a couple weeks and I will be sure to lay my grubby mitts on them and report back.

Until then…

Crippled Eagles, redux

uzi in rhodesia used by US Merc

Christian Beekman over at Task and Purpose went spot on with an analogy between the current wave of U.S. vets headed over to fight against ISIS in the Syria/Iraq region with another group of out-of-work soldiers from the Vietnam era.

As Vietnamization took hold and American involvement dwindled, many Vietnam veterans found themselves uncertain about what their future held. The American military was at a cultural low point, and the inflation-based economic woes of the late 1970s presented many vets with an unfavorable employment market.

But for some men, like John Alan Coey and Ken Gaudet, it went deeper than that.

Coey, who was an ardent anti-communist, was set to become a commissioned officer in the Marine Corps when the U.S. began drawing down in Vietnam. Coey viewed the American withdrawal from Vietnam as a betrayal of the United States’ commitment to fight communism.

Gaudet, who had served two tours in Vietnam with the 173rd Airborne Brigade, found he missed the military life, and wanted to get back to professional soldiering.

Dubbed the “The Crippled Eagles” by author Robin Moore, Coey and Gaudet were among roughly 300 Americans who decided to travel to Rhodesia and fight.

More here

« Older Entries Recent Entries »