Recently Iranian state news quoted a naval commander as saying his country plans to have a “powerful presence” near the U.S. border.
A Pentagon spokesman responded Wednesday by questioning if Iran was capable of carrying out the stated plan.George Little told reporters that Iran has the right to send vessels into international waters, but “whether they can truly project naval power beyond the region is another question.”
Hmm, really, lets take a look at this.
Iran has three Russian-built Kilo class diesel attack submarines
The Iranian Kilos:
Displacement: 4,000 tons submerged
Dimensions: 74 x 9.9 x 6.5 meters
Propulsion: Diesel-electric propulsion, 2 x 1000 kW Diesel generators, 1 x 5,500-6,800 shp, Propulsion motor, 1 x fixed-pitch Propeller
Speed: 25 knots (46 km/h)
Range: 7,500 nautical miles (13,890 km) (on diesels)
Crew: 52
Armament: 6 x 553 mm torpedo tubes, 18 x torpedoes, 24 x mines
Number Class Name Year Homeport
901 Kilo Tareq 1992 Bandar Abbas
902 Kilo Noor 1993 Bandar Abbas
903 Kilo Yunes 1997 Bandar Abbas
As you can see, these ships are classed to make a 7500-mile one way trip. If packed with a skeleton crew using high-calorie rations and a low consumption diet, and traveling at the most efficient speed. They could conceivably make the 7800 mile overseas voyage from Bandar Abbas to the coast of Venezuela and set up shop. IF Hugo Chavez was high-strung enough to push the issue.
Thats the big IF
IF Hugo didn’t extend refueling to the Islamic U-Boat, then all bets are off (maybe). IF he does allow them to buy gas a groceries there. Its on.
Iran would not even have to do anything with the submarine to gain a huge victory. All they would have to do is make it. The sight of a Russian made hunter killer, flying the flag of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the Caribbean, seemingly Uncle Sam’s private Koi Pond, would be a huge propaganda victory.
In World War Two, Hitler’s Kreigsmarine built and sent to see more than 700 Type VII Class U-Boats, many of whom sailed to the US East and Gulf Coast to sink dozens of American ships right off our coastline. These boats surely must have been larger than the Iranian Kilos right?
Lets See;
German Type VIIC, 1942
Displacement: 769 tonnes (757 long tons) surfaced
871 t (857 long tons) submerged
Length: 67.1 m (220 ft 2 in) o/a
Propulsion: 2 × supercharged Germaniawerft, 6-cylinder, 4-stroke M6V 40/46 diesels totaling 2,800–3,200 hp (2,100–2,400 kW). Max rpm: 470-490
Speed: 17.7 knots (20.4 mph; 32.8 km/h) surfaced
7.6 knots (8.7 mph; 14.1 km/h) submerged
Range: 15,170 km (8,190 nmi) at 10 kn (19 km/h) surfaced
150 km (81 nmi) at 4 kn (7.4 km/h) submerged
Is that right? The capable German subs are actually smaller? Hmpf.
Of course it will be pointed out that they sailed from France and not from Iran, however many did in fact spend extended time at sea sailing from Germany itself, refueling from milch-cow subs in the Western Hemisphere. Which of course couldn’t happen these days right. I mean could the country of Iran possibly outfit a ship with some spare diesel and food storage sailing under a Panamanian flag to float around the Caribbean? Impossible right!
? Right ?
What do we have to stop it from happening?
Well, Anti-Submarine warfare (ASW) in the US has been cut back systematically for nearly two decades. In the 1980s the US Navy had almost 500 land based P3 and carrier based S3 aircraft (on 15 aircraft carriers) who were dedicated to finding and busting subs. Today, all of the S3s are in the bone-yard or museums and less than 150 P3s remain (not all of them usable). They are slated to be replaced by as few as 100 P8’s in coming years. [S3’s in the bone-yard in Arizona]
In the 1980s we had 208 dedicated surface-based sub-killers:
8 Brooke and Bronstein Class Frigates
10 Garcia Class Frigates
46 Knox Class Frigates
51 Perry Class Frigates
31 Spruance Class Destroyers
23 Charles F Adams Class Destroyers
10 Farragut Class Destroyers
4 Kidd Class Destroyers
12 Hamilton Class High Endurance Cutters (Yes, back when the Coast Guard Had Sonar!)
13 Bear Class Medium Endurance Cutters (Again, Coast Guard Sonar!)
Plus no less than 30 Cruisers who would be dedicated to air defense, but were still capable of hammering the crap out of a Soviet Akula or Zulu if it came close enough to thier carriers.
These ships had a mix of ASROC Launchers, (since retired) and a half dozen 12.8inch (324 mm) ASW Torpedo Tubes and more often than not, SH-3 Seaking (retired), S-2 Seasprite (retired) and SH-60 Seahawk (redesigned to be more multimission and less ASW) antisubmarine helicopters.
[Ex-John Young, a Spruance Class Destroyer sunk in 2004 via SINKEX. Glad we dont need these anymore!]
Today we are left with: 80 dedicated surface-based sub-killers
The increasingly marginalized FFG-7 Perry frigates (only 19 fully active)
The DDG-51 Burke Class destroyers (61 completed but only 41 of these with helicopter hangars) These are excellent platforms but are more likely to be escorting carrier battle groups and amphibious ready groups along with the remaining CG-47 type cruisers than actually out independently looking for rouge subs.
The US Navy seems to have gone more multimission than ever before, and ASW is far down the list of priorities.
Good thing that the Iranians couldn’t possibly project naval assets to our coast.
I heard in 1940 that the Japanese couldn’t possibly use aerial torpedoes inside Pearl Harbor too.