Monthly Archives: June 2023

Going heavy, Landing Party style

With the mention of HMS Duke of York yesterday in the post about USS Ranger, these images of the Royal Marine detachment in June 1943 came to mind.

A most excellent photo essay in the IWM Collection by Lt J.A. Hampton, shows the RMs kitted up for landing party operations “in Northern waters” with small arms including Lanchester Mk. I 9mm burp guns, newly-issued Lee–Enfield No. 4 Mk I rifles in .303, Bren LMGs, No. 36 Mills Bombs, and at least one beautiful .55 bore Boys anti-tank rifle in all its 35-pound/5-foot joy.

Enjoy.

Tow Buggies!

Now this looks fun.

Photo: Master Corporal Richard Lessard, Garrison Petawawa; Master Corporal Matthew Tower, Canadian Forces Combat Camera, Canadian Armed Forces

The above shows an experiment by the 3rd Battalion, The Royal Canadian Regiment (3 RCR), using Polaris MRZR ATVs as weapon carriers mounting TOW anti-tank missiles, Heckler & Koch GMG 40mm grenade machine guns (Designated as the C16 Close Area Suppression Weapon, or CASW), and assorted GPMGs, at Petawawa last month.

Photo: Master Corporal Richard Lessard, Garrison Petawawa; Master Corporal Matthew Tower, Canadian Forces Combat Camera, Canadian Armed Forces

Photo: Master Corporal Richard Lessard, Garrison Petawawa; Master Corporal Matthew Tower, Canadian Forces Combat Camera, Canadian Armed Forces

Photo: Master Corporal Richard Lessard, Garrison Petawawa; Master Corporal Matthew Tower, Canadian Forces Combat Camera, Canadian Armed Forces

Such vehicles could prove useful in a fast-moving RDF scenario, especially in Third World countries ala Kolwezi, a sort of modern version of the old 106mm recoilless rifle-armed M151 Mutt.

A simple concept is still well-loved in out-of-the-way parts of Asia, Africa, and Latin America:

 

Now that is a good ambush position that American anti-armor teams of the 1950s and 60s will easily recognize.

And, don’t forget, the Marines swapped out their 106s for TOWs on their M151s back in the mid-1980s, so this is nothing new.

Marines of the 3rd Battalion, 6th Regiment, fire a jeep-mounted tube-launched, optically-tracked, wire-guided (TOW) heavy anti-tank weapon during Combined Arms exercises Five and Six. Wires used to guide the TOW missile can be seen extending from the barrel of the weapon, 5/1/1983 NARA 330-CFD-DM-ST-83-09020

Marines of the 3rd Battalion, 6th Regiment, fire a jeep-mounted tube-launched, optically-tracked, wire-guided (TOW) heavy anti-tank weapon during Combined Arms exercises Five and Six. Wires used to guide the TOW missile can be seen extending from the barrel of the weapon, 5/1/1983 NARA 330-CFD-DM-ST-83-09020

DF-ST-86-07566

Those chocolate chips! U.S. Marines drive an M-151 Light Utility Vehicle from a Utility Landing Craft (LCU) to shore during the multinational joint service Exercise BRIGHT STAR’85. The vehicle is armed with a BGM71 Tube-Launched, Optically-Tracked, Wire-Guided (TOW) missile launcher, 8/1/1985 NARA 330-CFD-DF-ST-86-07566

Of course, with such light-skinned vehicles, they are risky as hell, both in terms of offering no protection against any sort of incoming fire or shrapnel and in the basic fact that these will usually be driven by a 19-year-old gassed up on Rip Its and Sabaton. Plus, with all that extra top weight on vehicles already prone to rollover…yikes.

USS Recruit Now Open to the Public

A two-thirds-sized replica landlocked Dealey-class destroyer escort built by the Navy and given commissioned status, USS Recruit (TDE-1/TFFG-1) was constructed aboard Naval Training Center San Diego for more realistic recruit training in 1949.

Sailors gather in front of the newly built USS Recruit in July 1949. (National Archives)

She looked so good that the opening and closing scenes of the Don Rickles comedy CPO Sharkey were shot there.

NTC Orlando had a similar concept– USS Bluejacket— as did NTC Bainbridge, Maryland (USS Commodore) while NTC Great Lakes currently has the concrete-bound USS Trayer (BST-21).

Used in one form or another until 1997– after she was refurbished to look more like an Oliver Hazard Perry-class frigate, hence the later TFFG-1 designation. 

July 1982 Original Caption: Staff members of the Recruit Training Command line the rails of the newly retrofitted USS Recruit. Constructed in 1949 and affectionately known as the “USS Neversail”, Recruit is a mock frigate used for training purposes. (National Archives 29011234)

When San Diego was closed, USS Recruit became the property of the local redevelopment effort and was threatened with destruction more than once.

Now, after a decade of effort, she has been refurbished once more and, as part of the Liberty Station development, just opened to the public.

Cold Ranger, squishy date

Some 80 years ago. Maybe.

“Crewmembers aboard the aircraft carrier USS Ranger (CV-4) clean snow off of the aircraft during operations in the North Atlantic on 29 June 1943.”

Note the snow-dusted TBF Avengers, SBD Dauntless dive bombers, and F4F Wildcats, a very late 1942- late 1943 carrier air group. Via Hampton Roads Naval Museum. 

The date given is kind of specious, however.

While DANFS notes Ranger was in the Atlantic during this period, saying that between February when she made her fourth trip carrying Army P-40s to North Africa, and August when she chopped to support the British fleet’s operations in Norway she “trained pilots along the New England coast steaming as far north as Halifax, Nova Scotia,” her deck logs in the National Archives lists her as tied up at Buoy P-5 in Argentia, Newfoundland with part of her airwing (Air Group Four) ashore, rather than underway or even in a latitude high enough to have heavy snow at that time of year.

Further, the weather for nearby Gander for that day, while mentioning that temperatures dropped as low as 39 F degrees, it never dropped below freezing and no snow was reported, just light to moderate rain.

Air Group Four’s excellent website notes, “On April 2, she proceeded with Task Force 22 to Argentia, Newfoundland, arriving on April 4. Ranger operated with Air Group 4 in the Argentia area until early July 1943.”

This leads to the possibility that the picture was taken earlier in the year, as snow in Newfoundland is likely in April and even into early May, and the picture was just released (not taken) on 29 June.

Another possibility is that the photo is more likely from Operation Leader, the efforts against German forces in occupied Norway, and the Bodo raid a few months later. In that op, Air Goup 4 notes, “All hands became ‘Blue Noses’ having crossed the Arctic Circle on several occasions.”

Royal Navy battleship, HMS Duke of York, underway astern of USS Ranger (CV 4), September 1943 #80-G-88048 (2048×1641)

Either way, springing forward 80 years, we now have this very related video released by the Navy earlier this month of the world’s largest aircraft carrier, USS Gerald R. Ford’s (CVN 78), launching and recovering aircraft in the Norwegian Sea while on NATO operations.

And in Whiskey (optics) news…

Building on experience and feedback from both the company’s super sweet Tango series tactical scopes and previous Whiskey series hunting optics, SIG Sauer has a new generation of rifle scope on the market.

The company’s Whiskey 3 line is simple and rugged, proving popular with users in the field, especially for its affordable ($200-$300) price point. The new Whiskey 4 series grows on that lineage while bringing some more top-shelf features to play.

As a rule, the Whiskey 4s use 30mm tubes, upsized from the typical 1-inch tubes seen on the Whiskey 3 line. Then you toss in quick external turret adjustments, options for an illuminated reticle, and a removable magnification throw lever, and the Whiskey 4 line is getting seriously good for a modest bump in price to the $300-$500 range depending on which variant you choose. SIG is offering the Whiskey 4 in three different formats: a 5-20x50mm first focal plane, a 4-16x44mm FFP, and a shorty 3-12x44mm second focal plane, all with exposed zero stops.

I was able to get a sneak peek at the 5-20x50mm FFP and 3-12x44mm SFP Whiskey 4 last week in Oregon. Both felt genuinely nice and have sharp, clear lenses with little distortion at magnification while the Hellfire illuminated reticle was sweet.

The Whiskey 4 line uses a locking zero-stop elevation turret while all offer tactile 0.25 MOA adjustments.

The magnification throw levers are a nice upgrade from the Whiskey 3 line and are removable for those who worry about snags while hunting in the brush or while traveling in the backcountry via side-by-side or ATV.

I hit up SIG for one of these to wring out over this upcoming deer season and will get back to you with what I find out.

Warship Wednesday, June 28, 2023: The Tsar’s Jutland Veteran

Here at LSOZI, we take off every Wednesday for a look at the old steam/diesel navies of the 1833-1954 period and will profile a different ship each week. These ships have a life, a tale all their own, which sometimes takes them to the strangest places.- Christopher Eger

Warship Wednesday, June 28, 2023: The Tsar’s Jutland Veteran

Archivio Centrale dello Stato

Above we see the Italian light cruiser Bari moored at Patras in Axis-occupied Greece in May 1941. Note her laundry out to dry, her 5.9-inch guns trained to starboard, and her crew assembled on the bow with the band playing. A ship with a strange history, a wandering tale, she was lost some 80 years ago today.

The Muravyov-Amurskiy class

No fleet in military history was in desperate need of a refresh as the Imperial Russian Navy in the 1910s. Having lost 17 battleships (depending on how you classify them), 13 cruisers, 30 Destroyers, and a host of auxiliaries to the Japanese in 1904-1905, the Russians were left with virtually no modern combat ships except those bottled up in the Black Sea by the Ottomans. Also, with lessons learned from the naval clashes, it was clear the way of the future was dreadnoughts, bigger destroyers, and fast cruisers.

To fix this, the Russian Admiralty soon embarked on a plan to build eight very modern 25,000-ton Gangut, Imperatritsa Mariya, and Imperator Nikolai I-class battleships augmented by a quartet of massive 32,000-ton Borodino-class battlecruisers. With the age of the lumbering armored cruiser over, the Russians went with a planned eight-pack of fast new protected cruisers of the Svetlana and Admiral Nakhimov classes (7,000 tons, 30 knots, 15 5.1-inch guns, 2 x torpedo tubes, up to 3 inches of armor) as companions for the new battle wagons.

And, with Russia all but writing off its larger Pacific endeavors, eschewing rebuilding its former battle fleet there in favor of a much more modest “Siberian Military Flotilla” based out of often ice-bound Vladivostok and Petropavlovsk, the Tsar’s admirals deemed that just two light scouting cruisers were needed for overseas use in the Far East, typically to wave the flag, so to speak.

That’s where the Muravyov-Amurskiy class came in.

The two cruisers, at 4,500 tons displacement and 426 feet overall length, were generally just reduced versions of the Svetlana/Admiral Nakhimov classes being built in Russian yards already.

Planned to be armed with eight 5.1-inch guns and four torpedo tubes, they were turbine powered and expected to be fast– able to touch 35 knots at standard weight for short periods although published speeds were listed as 27.5 knots.

Mine rails over the stern allowed for up to 120 such devices to be quickly sown– a Russian specialty.

Their armor was thin, never topping three inches, and spotty with just a protective deck above machinery spaces, a protected conning tower, and 50mm gun shields.

Muravyov-Amursky class in 1914 Janes.

It should be noted the Russian cruisers feel very much like a follow-on to the experimental “cruiser corvette” SMS Gefion (4,275 t, 362 ft oal, 10 x 4-inch guns, 1-inch armor) that Schichau built at Danzig in the mid-1890s for overseas service. 
 

SMS Gefion, commissioned in 1895, would serve briefly in East Asia before she was laid up in 1901. After service as an accommodation hulk through the Great War, she was converted to use as a freighter, Adolf Sommerfeld, in 1920, only to be broken up a few years later.

The two new vessels were to be named after historic 19th Century Russian figures who had expanded the country’s reach towards the Pacific: General Count Nikolay Nikolayevich Muravyov-Amursky, a statesman who proposed abolishing serfdom; and Admiral Gennady Ivanovich Nevelskoy, a noted polar explorer.

General Muravyov-Amursky and Adm. Nevelskoy.

They were ordered in the summer of 1913 from F. Schichau’s Schiffswerft in Danzig, as yard numbers 893 and 894.

The choice to have a German firm build the new cruiser class wasn’t too unusual for the Tsarist fleet as the Russian cruiser Novik and four Kit-class destroyers was built at Schichau in the 1900s while Krupp delivered the early midget submarine Forel at about the same time. The Russian protected cruiser Askold, one of the most successful of her type, was built at Kiel by Germaniawerft while the cruiser Bogatyr was ordered from AG Vulcan’s Stettin shipyards, also in Germany.

Besides German orders and construction at domestic yards along both the Baltic and the Black Sea, the Russians also ordered warships and submarines from France, Britain, Denmark, and the U.S.– they needed the tonnage.

The planned future Muravyov-Amursky at Schichau-Werke, Danzig, on the occasion of her launch, 29 March 1914 (Old Style), 11 April (N.S.).

Ironically, this was at the same period that Russia’s primary military ally was France, whose principal threat was from Germany. However, most Russian Stavka strategists and statesmen of the era assumed that they would be far more likely to fight the Ottomans or Austrians– perhaps even the Swedes– long before the Germans.

Then came August 1914 and relations between Germany and Russia kind of took a turn.

Kreuzer Pillau

When Germany declared war on Imperial Russia, Muravyov-Amursky had been launched just four months prior and was fitting out with an expected delivery in the summer of 1915. Sistership Admiral Nevelskoy was still on the ways with her hull nearly complete. With the Kaiserliche Marine hungry for tonnage, they seized the two unfinished Russian cruisers and rushed them to completion.

Muravyov-Amursky was renamed after the East Prussian town of Pillau, and Nevelskoy after the West Prussian port city of Elbing. Muravyov-Amursky/Pillau was completed in December 1914 and Nevelskoy/Elbing was delivered the following September.

To keep them more in line with the rest of the German battleline, they were fitted with slightly larger (and better) 15 cm/45 (5.9″) SK L/45 guns, the same type used as secondary armament on German battleships and battlecruisers as well as later on most of their cruisers built during the Great War.

Pillau as seen during her German career. Courtesy of Master Sergeant Donald L.R. Shake, USAF, 1981. NHHC Catalog #: NH 92715

SMS Elbing of the Pillau class, circa 1915-16

SMS Pillau shortly after entering service, 1915

Pillau had her baptism of fire in the Battle of the Gulf of Riga in August 1915– ironically against the Russians– while Elbing took part in the bombardment of Yarmouth in April 1916. Both were assigned to the High Seas Fleet’s 2nd Scouting Group (II. Aufklärungsgruppe), commanded by Contre-Admiral Bödicker, and took a key role in the Battle of Jutland.

While Jutland is such a huge undertaking that I won’t even attempt to showcase it all in this post as I would never have the scope to do it properly, Elbing scored the first hit in the battle, landing a 5.9-inch shell against HMS Galatea from an impressive distance of about 13.000 m at 14.35 on 31 May. In the subsequent night action, she was accidentally rammed by the German dreadnought SMS Posen and had to be abandoned, with some of her crew saved by the destroyer S 53 and others landed on the Danish coast by a passing Dutch trawler.

As for Pillau, she was hit by a single large-caliber shell– a 12-incher from the battlecruiser HMS Inflexible— that left her damaged but still in the fight while she is credited with landing hits of her own on the cruiser HMS Chester. In all, Pillau had fired no less than 113 5.9-inch shells and launched a torpedo in the epic sea clash while suffering just four men killed and 23 wounded from her hit from Inflexible.

Her chart house blown to memories and half of her boilers out of action but still afloat, Pillau then served as the seeing eye dog for the severely damaged battlecruiser SMS Seydlitz— hit 21 times by heavy-caliber shells, twice by secondary battery shells, and once by a torpedo– on a slow limp back to Wilhelmshaven with the dreadnought’s bow nearly completely submerged.

German battlecruiser SMS Seydlitz, low in the water after Jutland. The image was likely taken from Pillau, who led her back to Wilhelmshaven from the battle

SMS Seydlitz after the Battle of Jutland, 1916. Amazingly, she only suffered 150 casualties during all that damage and would return to service by November– just six months later. Colorized photo by Atsushi Yamashita/Monochrome Specter http://blog.livedoor.jp/irootoko_jr/

Then, her work done, Pillau had to lick her wounds.

SMS Pillau in Wilhelmshaven showing heavy damage to her bridge, caused by a 12-in shell hit from the battlecruiser HMS Inflexible.

She only suffered 27 casualties at Jutland while her sister, Elbing, was lost.

The entry wound, so to speak

Repaired, Pillau took part in the Second Battle of Heligoland Bight on 17 November 1917 as well as other more minor operations before the end game in October 1918 in which her crewed mutinied and raised the red flag rather than head out in a last “ride of the Valkyries” suicide attack on the British Home Seas Fleet.

SMS Pillau passing astern of a ship of the line, winter 1917

SMS Pillau on patrol in Helgoland Bay, 1918 note AAA gun forward

Incrociatore Bari

Retained at Wilhelmshaven as part of the rump Provisional Realm Navy (Vorläufige Reichsmarine) under the aged VADM Adolf von Trotha while 74 ships of the High Seas Fleet surrendered to the British in November 1918 to comply with the Armistice, Pillau was saved from the later grand scuttling of that interned force seven months later at Scapa Flow.

The victorious allies, robbed of the choicest cuts of the German fleet, in turn, demanded Pillau be turned over for reparations along with a further nine surviving battleships, 15 cruisers, 59 destroyers, and 50 torpedo boats. Pillau was therefore steamed to Cherbourg and decommissioned by the Germans in June 1920.

It was decided that Pillau was to go to the Italians as a war prize, with the Regia Marina renaming her after the Adriatic port city of Bari in Italy’s Puglia region. The Italians also were to receive the surrendered German light cruisers SMS Graudenz and SMS Stassburg, the destroyer flotilla leader V.116, and the destroyers B.97 and S.63. Italy would further inherit a host of former Austrian vessels including the battleships Tegtthof, Zrinyi, and Radetzky; the cruisers Helgoland and Saida; and 15 destroyers.

The future light cruiser Bari seen in rough shape, with the provisional denomination “U” painted on her bow, right after being ceded to Italy, Taranto, 5 May 1921.

Embarrassingly, just after she entered service with the Italians, Bari ran aground at Terrasini and was stuck there for a week before being refloated.

Aerial photos of Bari stranded at Terrasini, 28 August 1925.

Still, she went on to have a useful and somewhat happy peacetime service with the Italian fleet.

L’incrociatore leggero Bari late 1920s a

L’incrociatore leggero Bari late 1920s

L’incrociatore leggero Bari late 1920s, seen from the port side.

Bari, fotografiado en Venecia en el año 1931

Italian cruiser Bari, in Venice in the early 1930s. Colorized by Postales Navales

Cruiser Bari (ex SMS Pillau ) in floating dock, 1930s

Italian light cruiser Bari (formerly the German SMS Pillau) moored at the pier in 1933

Italian Light Cruiser RM Bari pictured at Taranto c1929 

Bari would be extensively rebuilt in the early 1930s, including a new all-oil-fired engineering suite that almost doubled her range but dropped her top speed to 24 knots. This reconstruction included several topside changes to appearance as well as the addition of a few 13.2mm machine guns for AAA work.

Bari crosses the navigable canal of Taranto after the second round of modification works, circa 1933-40. Compare this to the postcard image shown above taken at the same angle and place that shows her mid-1920s appearance

Bari in the 1931 Janes Fighting Ships

She took part in the Ethiopian war in 1935 and would remain in the Red Sea as part of the Italian East African Naval Command well into May 1938. She then returned home for further modernization at Taranto in which her torpedo tubes were removed and a trio of Breda 20mm/65cal Mod. 1935 twin machine guns were installed and two twin 13.2/76 mm Breda Mod. 31s.

Bari, as covered by the U.S. Navy’s ONI 202, June 1943.

When Italy joined WWII, Bari was soon sent to join the invasion of Greece where she conducted minelaying and coastal bombing missions in the Adriatic and the Aegean. She served as the flagship of ADM Vittorio Tur’s Special Naval Force (Forza Navale Speciale, FNS), an amphibious group that was used to occupy the Ionian Islands including Corfu, Kefalonia, Santa Maura, Ithaca, and Zakynthos. She would also participate in naval gunfire bombardment operations on the coast of Montenegro and Greece against partisans and guerrillas.

Bari in Patras in occupied Greece, as the flagship of the Forza Navale Speciale, May 1941

Another shot from the same above.

Bari moored in Patras, around 18 June 1941, with the ensign of Ammiraglio Comandante Alberto Marenco di Moriondo aboard.

ADM Tur and the FNS, with Bari still as his flag, would go on to occupy the French island of Corsica in November 1942 during the implementation of Case Anton, the German-Italian occupation of Vichy France after the Allied Torch landings in North Africa.

Bari anchored at the breakwater of the harbor of Bastia, Corsica, on 11 November 1942, as the flagship of the Forza Navale Speciale that was then occupying the island after Operation Torch.

The cruiser in Bastia on November 11, 1942, during the Italian landings. Note the steel-helmeted blackshirt troops in the foreground

In January 1943, with the FNS disbanded and ADM Tur assigned to desk jobs, Bari retired to Livorno where she was to be fitted as a sort of floating anti-aircraft battery, her armament updated to include a mix of two dozen assorted 90mm, 37mm, and 20mm AAA guns.

This conversion was never completed.

On 28 June 1943, she was pummeled by B-17s of the 12th Air Force and sank in the industrial canal at Livorno, deemed a total loss.

From 10 June 1940 to the sinking, the Bari had conducted 47 war missions and steamed 6,800 nautical miles.

After the Italian armistice, the Germans attempted to salvage the cruiser for further use but in the end wound up scuttling it once more in 1944. Post-war, she was stricken from the Italian naval list in 1947 and raised for scrapping the following year.

Epilogue

Very few remnants of these cruisers endure.

A painting by German maritime artist Otto Poetzsch was turned into a series of widely circulated Deutsches Reich postcards, used to depict both Pillau and Elbing.

Elbing‘s wreck has been extensively surveyed and studied over the years and is generally considered to be in good shape after spending a century on the bottom of the Baltic. Besides her guns, she has china and glassware scattered around the hull.

The Russian scale model firm Combrig makes a 1/700 scale kit of Pillau.


Ships are more than steel
and wood
And heart of burning coal,
For those who sail upon
them know
That some ships have a
soul.


If you liked this column, please consider joining the International Naval Research Organization (INRO), Publishers of Warship International

They are possibly one of the best sources of naval study, images, and fellowship you can find. http://www.warship.org/membership.htm

The International Naval Research Organization is a non-profit corporation dedicated to the encouragement of the study of naval vessels and their histories, principally in the era of iron and steel warships (about 1860 to date). Its purpose is to provide information and a means of contact for those interested in warships.

With more than 50 years of scholarship, Warship International, the written tome of the INRO has published hundreds of articles, most of which are unique in their sweep and subject.

PRINT still has its place. If you LOVE warships, you should belong.

I’m a member, so should you be!

Welcome back, Marlin 1894

Marlin first introduced the now classic revolver-caliber lever gun back in 1894, hence the name, originally chambered in then-contemporary cartridges such as .25-20, .32-20, .38-40, and .44-40. With a straight grip, rectangular lever, 24-inch octagonal barrel, and a healthy 10-shot tubular magazine, the “solid top” Model 1894 was popular enough to remain in production well into the 1930s.

The original Marlin 1894 was a product of the company’s LL Hepburn era and drew heavily from preceding designs such as the very similar Model 1893, shown here in the Cody exhibit at SHOT Show 2019, with the big difference being that the 1894 was the company’s first “solid top” rifle. (Photo: Chris Eger)

Marlin restored the M1894 to its catalog in 1969– when Old Western TV shows like “Gunsmoke” and “Bonanza” were must-watch prime-time family programming– and updated the caliber to the more readily-available .44 Special/Magnum. At the same time, the company shortened the rifle a bit via an easier-to-shoulder 20-inch round profile barrel but otherwise kept the same general layout as the original.

Marlin kept the Vietnam-era M1894 reboot in and out of production, including shorter carbine options and variants chambered in .357 Mag, .41 Mag, and .45 Colt, until the model finally vanished altogether in 2020 with the bankruptcy of Remington Outdoors, which had acquired the Marlin brand a decade prior.

In its final days before going out of production in 2020, the Marlin 1894 was seen as an ideal suppressor host, seen with an AAC Illusion fitted. Note the solid top design allowed easy fitment of optics. (Photo: Chris Eger)

Fast forward to this week and, with Ruger now firmly in the driver’s seat of the rebooted brand, the Marlin 1894 is back.

Chambered in .44 Rem Mag/Special, the new Ruger-made Marlin Model 1894 Classic sports an American black walnut straight stock and forend with pressed in checkering and, much like the circa 1969 2nd generation gun, has a 20-inch round-profile barrel and 10-shot mag.

More in my column at Guns.com.

Forgotten Canadians: The WWII Veterans Guard

With news that the Canadian military just this week has finally made progress on replacing their WWII-era Browning Hi-Powers, this 80th-anniversary image seems very relevant:

The above shows one middle-aged Corporal A.M. McLean of the Veteran’s Guard of Canada in June 1943. Clad in a  No. 2 helmet and armed with an American-made Reising submachine gun, his unit was tasked primarily with guarding Axis E-POWs in Canada.

At the time the image was taken, the force, composed largely of Great War vets still ready to serve in secondary roles, was at its height, numbering over 10,000 men under arms at a time when the country had a population of just 11 million.

A Canadian “Dad’s Army,” for sure.

As noted by the IWM:

On 23rd May 1940, it was announced in the Canadian Parliament that a Veterans Home Guard was being formed from men between the ages of 40 and 65, mainly WW1 veterans. The idea was to make use, for domestic security duties, of experienced personnel too old for active service overseas. Twelve companies, each of around 250 personnel, were to be formed initially, with a number of reserve companies formed in due course. The name was shortly changed to the Veterans Guard of Canada.

They would be named with a mix of Ross rifles, SMLE .303s, and P14 Enfields. 

Note the Ross rifles. “Inspection of Veteran Guard, Internment Camp 130,” Kananaskis, Alta., photographed by William John Oliver LAC 3514979

Veterans Guard members, including some very aged corporals, training with a SMLE No. 1. MKIII

On the march with American-made P14 Enfields

Members of the Veterans Guard of Canada pose for a color publicity photo in an Ottawa studio via the LAC

Veterans Guard of Canada member poses for a color publicity photo, complete with his Belgian Great War ribbons, LAC

Many stood guard over power plants, factories, and other sites considered potentially vulnerable but most were assigned as guards for prisoner of war and internment camps. Guarding these prisoners was initially the responsibility of the Canadian Provost Corps but in May 1941 full responsibility for them was passed to the Veterans Guard. It was to prove a significant undertaking. Britain had initially asked Canada to accept some 4,000 internees and 3,000 prisoners of war, but this soon increased to the point where, at its peak in October 1944, Canada was holding no less than 34,193 prisoners on behalf of the UK.

With the growth of tasks came the growth of the Guard.

By March 1941 there were 29 active companies with a total strength of 206 officers and 6,360 other ranks. Of these, 98 officers and 2,848 other ranks were guarding internment camps, the balance of personnel being employed in guarding vulnerable points and training. There were in addition 43 reserve companies with a total strength of 183 officers and 3,765 other ranks.

The Guard reached its peak of strength in June 1943, when its Active strength was 451 officers and 9,806 other ranks, which included 37 companies and 17 internment camp staff in Canada.

The Guard also served overseas. One served in Newfoundland, and another went to the UK as the General Duties Company at CMHQ in London.

In the spring of 1942, there was concern that ships carrying bauxite from the mines in British Guiana might be sabotaged while on the Demerara River. The British Government asked whether Canada could provide white officers and NCOs to supervise the locally recruited colored guards assigned to the shipping. No. 34 Company was formed for this purpose, comprising officers and NCOs only, and it reached Georgetown in June 1942. The posting was extremely unpleasant, as the ships were filthy and the weather sweltering. They were not withdrawn until January 1945.

The British Government also requested Canada to provide a guard for the Governor of the Bahamas, The Duke of Windsor. ‘N’ Force, or No. 33 Company of the Veterans Guard, was formed for that purpose in April 1943 and arrived in Nassau in June. They were relieved by a company of the Pictou Highlanders in the autumn.

There were other less routine assignments. In early 1944 the British Army Staff in Washington asked Canada to supply personnel to “conduct” mules from New York to Karachi. Four shiploads of mules were taken by Canadian Army parties between March 1944 and April 1945, four of which were provided by the Veterans Guard.

The last Veterans Companies were disbanded in 1947.

Tornado und der Luftwaffe

Check out this great AP Archives video from 22 June 1977, right at 46 years ago, showing a then very new aircraft: the Panavia Tornado, in West German service. It includes both a test bird in a bright scheme as well as one in a more standard livery.

At the 1:06 mark, an older man is seen climbing from the rear seat of the ‘Nado is Generalmajor Gerhard Limberg, then Chef des Stabes, 4th Allied Tactical Air Force (4. ATAF) at Heidelberg.

The good general had cut his teeth flying Fw 190 A-3/U3 “Jabo” (Jagdbomber), fast tactical fighter bombers– a direct generational ancestor of the Tornado– with III./ Schnellkampfgeschwader 10 (SKG 10, later S.G. 4), earning the DKiG in 1944. He was in the air and very effective at Dieppe in 1942 and later over Sicily in 1943.

Postwar, he was accepted in the renewed Luftwaffe (Bundeswehr) in 1956 as a 36-year-old Oberleutnant.

He would go on to retire as Generalleutnant, Inspekteur, Führungsstab der Luftwaffe in 1978 and pass in 2006.

Navy picking up more high-speed target boats

One of last week’s more interesting DOD contracts:

Silver Ships Inc.,* Theodore, Alabama, is awarded a $7,814,630 firm-fixed-price modification to previously-awarded contract N00024-23-F-2201 for the acquisition of 49 additional High-Speed Maneuvering Surface Target (HSMST) craft and accessories, 12 service manuals, 6 spare engines, and 38 sets of deployment spares. Work will be performed in Theodore, Alabama, and is expected to be completed by March 2025. The fiscal 2023 appropriation account for other procurement (Navy) funds in the amount of $4,016,330 (51%); and the fiscal 2022 appropriation account for other procurement (Navy) funds in the amount of $3,798,300 (49%), will be obligated at time of award; none of which will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. The Naval Sea Systems Command, Washington, D.C., is the contracting activity.

The HSMST is a remotely operated target drone based on Metal Shark’s 26-foot AM800 fire boat.

While the DOD release mentions just 49 hulls, a presser from Silverships details that there are options for 246 HSMSTs that would bring the cumulative value of the contract to $48.25 milly.

The 27-foot custom-built AM800 target boats feature a 9-foot 8-inch beam and include an air or foam collar depending on the boat variant. Each AM800 will be outfitted with a specialized compartment designed for installing remote control systems and electronics. These target boats are fully operational and built to the Navy’s specifications and payload requirements depending on the boat’s specific mission. Vessels can be operated by a one or two-person crew for training purposes but are remotely operated during live-fire training.

Most of the 246 HSMSTs ordered will be powered by twin Suzuki 225HP outboards. The remaining boats included in this contract will be powered by Mercury Diesel Spark Ignition outboards to fulfill Navy fueling requirements. HSMSTs are designed with several uncommon design elements specific to their unique mission, for example, an above-deck fuel tank allowing operators to replace tanks quickly and easily.

The company had previously been awarded a contract in 2013 for 350 HSMSTs to be delivered by 2017. A lot of them wind up getting zapped.

180502-N-EN275-1040. ATLANTIC OCEAN (May 2, 2018) A close-in weapons system (CIWS) 20mm radar-guided Gatling gun aboard the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) disables a remote-controlled high-speed maneuvering seaborne target (HSMST) during Combat Systems Ship Qualification Trials (CSSQT). (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Jacob Smith/Released)

I’d also like to point out that the HSMST is very relevant in the age of Ukrainian drone attack boats.

For reference, via the recent swarm attack of six such boats against the Russian spy ship Priazovye.

Via Russian MOD. 

« Older Entries