Category Archives: security and preparedness

A lost skill

WAF plots air defense information on a huge Plexi-Glass surveillance board in the Continental Air Defense Command Combat Operations Center

Throwback Thursday!

In this photo from the mid-1950’s, a Woman in the Air Force or WAF plots air defense information on a huge Plexi-Glass surveillance board in the Continental Air Defense Command Combat Operations Center, located at Ent Air Force Base near downtown Colorado Springs.

She’s writing backwards so the battle staff seated in front of the board can read and analyze the information. All “tracks” of unknown aircraft approaching or near the United States were plotted on this board.

Ent closed in 1976 and is presently the US Olympic Training Center, located at Union Boulevard and Boulder Street in Colorado Springs.

The practice was not just a U.S. one. Here’s a vintage photo from Canada of a RCAF member in a NATO facility in Metz, France writing backwards on plotting board there.

RCAF member in Metz, France plots backwards canadian
Hattip, Peterson Air and Space Museum, Canadian Forces Museum of Aerospace Defence

 

The backup island (s)

Warisboring has an interesting report on Tinian, long a U.S. Territory/Dependency that makes up one of the three principal islands of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands just a few miles off from Saipan (where a maritime prepositioning squadron of ships chills out).

If you are a military history buff, you know Tinian well.

Part of the Spanish Empire from 1521, the Spaniards sold the chain to Kaiser Wilhelm in the great worldwide colonial going out of business sale that followed that country’s defeat in 1898 by the US of A.

Fast forward to 1914 and British ally Japan quickly gobbled up the island, moving over 15,000 colonists from the overcrowded Home Island there by the time the balloon went up in 1941. The island was then pried from Tojo’s hands during the Battle of Tinian in 1944 during which only 313 survivors were left standing from the 8500-man Japanese garrison. You don’t want to know what happened to the Japanese and Korean civilians.

2nd Division Marines disembark from their LST at Tinian Island.

2nd Division Marines disembark from their LST at Tinian Island, 24 July 1944.

Anyway, Seebees landed and built a huge airstrip from which, on 6 and 9 AUG 1945, B-29s of the 509th Composite Group (Enola Gay and Bockscar) took off from to carry Little Boy and Fat Man to Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The military kept a presence on Tinian through the 1980s and now, with a population of just ~3,000 locals, is looking to get back into the swing of things.

Tinian's North Field

Tinian’s North Field

You see, besides holding on to semi-abandoned fields at Shemya, Wake, French Frigate Shoals and Midway, with the possibility of China plastering Guam and Okinawa in a Pacific WWIII scenario, Tinian would be nice to have as a backup– and is within strategic air-range of Beijing and Taiwan.

More here

The 36 Hour War, as seen in 1945

The 36-Hour War from November 19, 1945 — only a few months after Hiroshima and Nagasaki– LIFE Magazine

Click to big up and drink in the Atomic kool-aide.

36 hour war 36 2 36 36 3 36 a 36 34 36 end

The text if you are interested, courtesy of Drexel University :

This week General Henry H. Arnold, commanding officer of the Army Air Forces, published his third formal report to the Secretary of War. The report was not only a history of Air Forces activities at the end of the late war but a warning of future wars. Said the general: “In the past, the United States has shown a dangerous willingness to be caught in a position of having to start a war with equipment and doctrines used at the end of a preceding war…. Military Air Power should…be measured to a large extent by the ability of the existing Air Force to absorb in time of emergency…new ideas and techniques.”

The Army Air Forces, said General Arnold, were fully prepared to absorb new ideas: “We can run a large air operation for the sole purpose of delivering one or two atomic bombs….When improved antiaircraft defenses make this impracticable, we should be ready with a weapon of the general type of the German V-2 rocket, having greatly improved range and precision….”

Such weapons as these, in the hands of other nations as well as the U.S., would make possible the ghastliest of all wars. Hostilities would begin with the explosion of atomic bombs in cities like London, Paris, Moscow or Washington (above). The destruction caused by the bombs would be so swift and terrible that the war might well be decided in 36 hours. The illustrations on these pages show how such a war might be fought if it came.

But General Arnold did not suggest that improved weapons were the only safeguard of the U.S. It would be better, he said, to use bombs for peace now rather than for war later, possibly by using them as a power to enforce decisions of the United Nations Organization’s Security Council.

The start of another war, said General Arnold, might come with shattering speed: “With present equipment an enemy air power can, without warning, pass over all formerly visualized barriers and can deliver devastating blows at our population centers and our industrial, economic or governmental heart even before surface forces can be deployed.”

In the panorama above, looking eastward from 3,000 miles above the Pacific, LIFE’s artist has shown the U.S. as it might appear a very few years from now, with a great shower of enemy rockets falling on 13 key U.S. centers. Within a few seconds atomic bombs have exploded over New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Boulder Dam, New Orleans, Denver, Washington, Salt Lake City, Seattle, Kansas City and Knoxville. One bomb (second from left) has been exploded high above the earth by a U.S. defensive rocket (see illustration on page 31). In the cities more than 10,000,000 people have been instantly killed by the bombs. The enemy’s purpose is not to destroy industry, which is an objective only in long old-fashioned wars like the last one, but to paralyze the U.S. by destroying its people.

The rockets above, white-hot from traveling part of their journey through the atmosphere at three miles a second, have in a little more than an hour soared 1,800 miles up and some 8,000 miles around the earth from equatorial Africa. There an enemy of the U.S. has built its rocket-launching sites quickly and secretly in the jungle to escape detection by the UNO Security Council. In their flight the rockets coast most of the way through empty space, where the stars are out at noon. The thin luminous band on the horizon is the earth’s atmosphere.

“Radar,” said General Arnold, “is an outstanding contribution to the effectiveness of an air force. It is a device which enormously extends…human vision.” In the picture above, radar has been applied to the war of the rockets. A radar beam of enormous power sweeps the sky so that even objects thousands of miles in space send back radio echoes. The echoes are then translated into images on the luminous screen. If such a radar were in use, it would give the U.S. about 30 minutes to get ready for the attack shown on these pages.

But even 30 minutes is too little time for men to control the weapons of an atomic war. Radar would detect enemy rockets, plot their course and feed data to electronic calculators in defensive rockets. These would then be launched in a matter of seconds to intercept the attackers (see next page).

Radar, however would at best be a spotty defense in future wars. Like human sight, it extends only to the horizon. Low-flying robot planes like the German buzz-bomb might evade it more effectively than high-flying rockets. And radar would be no proof at all against time bombs of atomic explosive which enemy agents might assemble in the U.S.

Said General Arnold: “Although there now appear to be insurmountable difficulties in an active defense against future atomic projectiles similar to the German V-2 but armed with atomic explosives, this condition should only intensify our efforts to discover an effective means of defense.” The only defense now conceivable against a rocket, once it is in flight, is illustrated above. It is another rocket, fired like an antiaircraft shell at a point where it will meet its enemy. Once it had been launched, such a rocket might detect the attacking machine with radar and make its own corrections. When it came near the enemy rocket, it could be exploded by radio proximity fuse, a development of World War II. But inevitably it would miss some of the time.

Shown above is the instant before the two rockets meet. The enemy rocket, coasting through space with its fuel exhausted, is beginning to fall toward the U.S. The defensive rocket, racing upwards under full power, is incandescent from the friction of its short passage through the earth’s atmosphere. When the two collide, the atomic explosion will appear to observers on the earth as a brilliant new star.

Concerning other possible defenses in an atomic war, General Arnold said: “Three types of defense against an atomic bomb can be conceived: First, we should attempt to make sure that nowhere in the world are atomic bombs being made clandestinely; second, we should devise every possible active defense against an atomic bomb attack, once launched, and third, we might redesign our country for minimum vulnerability….” But the U.S. , he continued, “…must recognize that real security against atomic weapons in the visible future will rest on our ability to take immediate offensive action with overwhelming force. It must be apparent to a potential aggressor than an attack on the United States would be immediately followed by an immensely devastating air-atomic attack on him.”

On these two pages is a combination of two of General Arnold’s ideas: decentralization and counterattack. This cross section shows an underground rocket-launching site and atomic bomb factory. It is completely self-contained except for raw materials, which are assembled in big stockpiles. Its workers live underground near their machines, secure against anything except a direct atomic bomb hit or an airborne invasion. Altogether the US might have several dozen such units, all independent so that the destruction or capture of one would not affect the others. At the beginning of the 36-hour war the US has not yet decentralized its entire population, an operation which might cost $250,000,000,000, but only the absolute essentials of national defense.

At the moment illustrated above, the U.S. has sent its first offensive rocket of the war toward an enemy city, just one hour after the enemy attack.

Said General Arnold: “Airborne troops have become one of the most effective units of a modern fighting force….Fully equipped airborne task forces will be able to strike at far distant points and will be totally supplied by air.”

In spite of the apocalyptic destruction caused by its atomic bombs, an enemy nation would have to invade the U.S. to win the war. The enemy’s airborne troops would be equipped with light rocket weapons of great destructive power (above, rear) and devices such as goggles which make troop-directing infrared signals visible. The enemy soldier above is repairing a telephone line in a small U.S. town.

By the time enemy troops have landed, the U.S. has suffered terrifying damage. Some 40,000,000 people have been killed and all cities of more than 50,000 population have been leveled. San Francisco’s Market Street, Chicago’s Michigan Boulevard and New York’s Fifth Avenue are merely lanes through the debris. But as it is destroyed the U.S. is fighting back. The enemy airborne troops are wiped out. U.S. rockets lay waste the enemy’s cities. U.S. airborne troops successfully occupy his country.

The U.S. wins the atomic war.

(who else?)

That’s pretty fast for an autonomous backpack UAV

DARPA’s Fast Lightweight Autonomy (FLA) program recently demonstrated that a commercial quadcopter platform could achieve 20-meters-per-second flight while carrying a full load of sensors and cameras.

So what’s the big deal?

Well, that’s 45mph in a small (fit through a window or doorway) drone. And by drone, we don’t mean remote control quad, the project is seeking to have a completely autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles to fly at speeds up to 20 m/s with no communication to the operator and without GPS.

Nothing like clearing a building via remote which will save the lives of Joes and Marines in the long run.

Matryoshka ! Send it…

Arron over at the Weapon Blog has a great drill using the Russian Doll target

russian doll target

The targets are free to download and print to standard 8.5″ x 11″ printer paper….

3 TARGET DRILL – Tape 3 Targets Up at a Time. Shoot 1st Row of Targets Left to Right, One Shot Each. Shoot 2nd Row of Targets Right to Left, One Shot Each. On the last Row, run the Board (Shoot Left to Right, then Right to Left, One Shot Each).

3 TARGET DRILL – DOUBLE TAPS – Perform the “3 TARGET DRILL” Except Perform Double Taps (2 consecutive shots) on each target before moving along instead of one.

3 TARGET DRILL – STRONG AND WEAK (PISTOL) – Tape 3 Targets Up at a Time. Shoot 1st Row of Targets Left to Right, One Shot Each, using a standard two-handed grip. Shoot 2nd Row of Targets Left to Right, One Shot Each, with your Strong Hand Only. Shoot 3nd Row of Targets Left to Right, One Shot Each, with your Weak Hand Only. Feel Free to Replace Single Shots with Double Taps.

3 TARGET DRILL – STRONG AND WEAK (CARBINE) – Tape 3 Targets Up at a Time. Shoot 1st Row of Targets Left to Right, One Shot Each, using your Strong Shooting Side. Shoot 2nd Row of Targets Left to Right, One Shot Each, with your Weak Shooting Side. Switch Back to your Strong Shooting Side for the 3nd Row of Targets, Shoot from Left to Right, this time with Double Taps.

BUDDY DRILL – Have a friend go to the range and call out numbers. Shoot the doll corresponding to the number called out. Call out multiple numbers at once and shoot them in that order.

GAO says National Security Cutters have issues

The Coast Guard’s latest 418-foot National Security Cutter, James (WSML 754), is underway in the Atlantic Ocean, Thursday, July 30, 2015. The James is the fifth of eight planned National Security Cutters – the largest and most technologically advanced class of cutters in the Coast Guard’s fleet. The cutters’ design provides better sea-keeping, higher sustained transit speeds, greater endurance and range, and the ability to launch and recover small boats from astern, as well as aviation support facilities and a flight deck for helicopters and unmanned aerial vehicles. (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Auxiliarist David Lau)

The Coast Guard’s latest 418-foot National Security Cutter, James (WSML 754), is underway in the Atlantic Ocean, Thursday, July 30, 2015. The James is the fifth of eight planned National Security Cutters – the largest and most technologically advanced class of cutters in the Coast Guard’s fleet.  (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Auxiliarist David Lau)

A report by the GAO issued last month has gripes with the USCG’s new 418-foot National Security Cutters which have been slowly joining the fleet. While quantum leaps over the old 378s they are replacing on a 1:1.5 ratio due to the fact they have longer legs, better accommodations, stern launched small boats, capabilities for both a Dolphin and a UAV at the same time as well as more up-to-date EW, ELINT, radar and commo gear, they are still having problems with making their weapons suite do what it is designed for.

Now keep in mind that the weapons on Coast Guard cutters are actually “owned” by the Navy so there has always been a degree of disconnect, but there are still some pretty bad things that have surfaced over the course of Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E) and Combat System Ship Qualification Trials (CSSQT).

national security cutter weapon systems

While the CIWS, NULKA launcher, and air search radar were all repaired following IOT&E, post operational reports indicate that problems persist with these systems as they were often unavailable during operations. For example, the CIWS was inoperable on the Stratton for at least 61 days in 2014; the NULKA was inoperable on the Stratton from October 2013 through April 2014; and, according to Coast Guard officials, the air search radar has had 18 casualties, or failures, across the three operational NSCs over the past 19 months, with a lead time for repairs of up to 18 months. Further, the ship was not tested to see if it could achieve a hard and soft kill against a subsonic anti-ship cruise missile due to a moratorium on using target drones.

Also, getting ammo to the CIWS is a bitch:

The ammunition hoists are difficult to use in their current configuration, and the crew of the NSC prefers to carry ammunition for the CIWS by hand rather than use the hoist.

Then there are engine problems which include overheating engines in tropical waters and cracked heads at an alarming rate:

The NSC has encountered casualties with the engines’ cylinder heads at a higher than expected rate, averaging four cracked cylinder heads per cutter per year. According to Coast Guard officials, cylinder heads are not normally expected to fail at this rate. The equipment manufacturer has redesigned the cylinder heads in an effort to prevent them from cracking, and all of the operational NSCs have been equipped with the re-designed part, but the NSCs have continued to experience cracked cylinder heads even with the new design, which can result in an inability to conduct operations. For example, in 2014, the Waesche missed 11 planned operational days as a result of this problem.

However, as the report states, a series of mods, upgrades and “we’re working on it(s)” are planned.

Congress finally approved both a polar and another Great Lakes icebreaker

If you have read this insipid blog long enough you know that I am a fan of icebreakers (the ships, not the chat-up)  and bemoaned the long-running lack of such vessels in U.S. maritime service.

Well it seems Congress is finally doing something about it.

"A Coast Guard Icebreaker  on patrol in the Antarctic, moves through the ice floe." WAGB Southwind by Thomas Carr (ID# 87112) USCG Image. (Click to bigup, very nice image)

“A Coast Guard Icebreaker on patrol in the Antarctic, moves through the ice floe.” WAGB Southwind by Thomas Carr (ID# 87112) USCG Image. (Click to bigup, very nice image)

The Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2015  passed by voice vote in the U.S. House of Representatives on Monday, Feb. 1, approving a bill the Senate passed in December. It now moves to President Barack Obama’s desk for a signature.

As part of the $1.9 billion included with the bill is money for a new polar icebreaker and one for the Great Lakes.

“This bipartisan bill authorizes the Coast Guard for two years and strengthens its ability to recapitalize an aging fleet of cutters and aircraft that are decades past their prime,” said Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-California.

Now hold your breath and wait for the ships to pop out, which may be a totally different thing altogether.

Remember that 747 full of cruise missiles? Hey….

747-200F-ALCM-Carrier

I give you, the Cruise Missile Carrier Aircraft, or CMCA, a 1980s plan from Boeing to use a 747-200C as a cruise missile launcher. It could hold upto 72 ALCMs in 9 launchers with the missiles ejected out of the stern of the aircraft then lit off. If used right and kept secret (ala not even mentioned in SALT), could have been an uber scary first strike weapon.

Cruise Missile Carrier Aircraft 2 MC747 Cruise Missile Carrier Aircraft us004208949-005

And who knows, maybe they did.

 

Navy missing SIM cards from briefly detained patrol boats

151117-N-JC374-138 ARABIAN GULF (Nov. 17, 2015) Boatswain's Mate 1st Class Soualiho Fofana, assigned to Commander, Task Group (CTG) 56.1, uses a satellite phone for communications during a U.S.-U.K. Mine Countermeasures Exercise (MCMEX). U.S.-U.K. MCMEX is designed to improve interoperability and evolve the expeditionary mine countermeasures company concept of employment from an afloat forward staging base and afloat platforms of opportunity. (U.S. Navy Combat Camera photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Jonah Stepanik/Released)

151117-N-JC374-138 ARABIAN GULF (Nov. 17, 2015) Boatswain’s Mate 1st Class Soualiho Fofana, assigned to Commander, Task Group (CTG) 56.1, uses a satellite phone for communications during a U.S.-U.K. Mine Countermeasures Exercise (MCMEX). U.S.-U.K. MCMEX is designed to improve interoperability and evolve the expeditionary mine countermeasures company concept of employment from an afloat forward staging base and afloat platforms of opportunity. (U.S. Navy Combat Camera photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Jonah Stepanik/Released)

It seems according to multiple operational reports received by U.S. Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT) in the the days after the 15 hour detainment of 10 U.S. Sailors and their two NAVCENT Riverine Command Boats (RCBs) after they drifted into Iranian territorial waters shows that some sat phones were fooled with.

From USNI

A post-recovery inventory of the boats found that all weapons, ammunition and communication gear are accounted for minus two SIM cards that appear to have been removed from two handheld satellite phones.

The Sailors are in good health and continue to go through the reintegration process. The Navy command investigation continues and more details will be provided when it is completed.

Doh

Harry goes 3D

Seagoing ships from the smallest trawler to the largest naval vessel have long dedicated precious space to repair lockers. With the 6,000 man crews of the floating nuclear-powered cities that make up the super carriers of the U.S. Navy, they have whole departments with dedicated shops that can meet electrical, sheet metal paint, DC, hull, aviation, and other needs.

Now, add a 3D printing shop.

151127-N-DZ642-052 ATLANTIC OCEAN (Nov. 27, 2015) Aviation Electronics Technician 2nd Class A Figert uses a #-D printer aboard aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75). Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group is deployed to support maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the U.S. 5th and 6th Fleet areas of operation. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class B. Siens/Released)

151127-N-DZ642-052 ATLANTIC OCEAN (Nov. 27, 2015) Aviation Electronics Technician 2nd Class A Figert uses a 3-D printer aboard aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75). Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group is deployed to support maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the U.S. 5th and 6th Fleet areas of operation. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class B. Siens/Released)

From Stars and Stripes:

Within their first weeks of deploying in November, sailors already had created and “printed out” custom dust caps and a wrench. A sailor in the “fab lab” designed his own solution after he and others grew frustrated that an oil cup on a machine was too small for a funnel.

“It required at least two people to get all the oil in the cup, so I figured we have this technology here, why not try something that would make this task easier,” Petty Officer 2nd Class Raymond Lee said. “I came up with an extension that narrows the nozzle, cuts the manpower in half, ensures there’s no spilled oil all over the deck.”

Officials aboard the ship say ideas for using the printer are pouring in from sailors.

“I think the possibilities are endless,” Lee said.

The ‘fab lab’ consists of two 3-D printers, a desktop computer and a large flat-screen monitor with a wireless keyboard and mouse. The printers are similar in size and shape to a traditional desktop printer.

More here

« Older Entries Recent Entries »