Category Archives: russia

Aleutian Games

Yup, that’s a Russian sub.

The U.S. Coast Guard spotted four Russian Navy warships on Sunday, 57 miles northwest of Point Hope, Alaska.

The crew of U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Stratton (WMSL 752) encountered and shadowed four Russian Federation Navy (RFN) vessels 57 miles northwest of Point Hope, Alaska, on Sept. 15, 2024. The Russian Surface Action Group consisted of a Severodvinsk-class submarine, a Dolgorukiy-class submarine, a Steregushchiy–class Frigate, and a Seliva-class tug. Stratton patrolled under Operation Frontier Sentinel, a Coast Guard operation designed to meet presence with presence when strategic competitors operate in and around U.S. waters. (U.S. Coast Guard courtesy photo)

From USCG PAO:

While on a routine patrol in the Chukchi Sea, the crew of U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Stratton (WMSL 752) observed the RFN vessels transiting southeast along the Russian side of the Maritime Boundary Line (MBL).

The crew of the Stratton witnessed the RFN vessels cross the MBL into the U.S. Arctic and moved to observe the vessels. The Russian vessels were assessed to avoid sea ice on the Russian side of the MBL and operated according to international rules and customs as they transited approximately 30 miles into the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone.

“We are actively patrolling our maritime border in the Bering Sea, Bering Strait, and the Chukchi Sea, with our largest and most capable cutters and aircraft, to protect U.S. sovereign interests, U.S. fish stocks, and to promote international maritime norms,” said Rear Adm. Megan Dean, Commander of Coast Guard District Seventeen. “Coast Guard Cutter Stratton ensured there were no disruptions to U.S. interests.”

The Russian Surface Action Group consisted of a Severodvinsk-class submarine, a Dolgorukiy-class submarine, a Steregushchiy–class Frigate, and a Seliva-class tug.

The Stratton is patrolling under Operation Frontier Sentinel, designed to meet presence with presence when strategic competitors operate in and around U.S. waters. The Coast Guard’s presence strengthens the international rules-based order and promotes the conduct of operations in a manner that follows international law and norms.

Coast Guard Cutter Stratton is a 418-foot legend class national security cutter homeported in Alameda, Calif.

Meanwhile on Shemya Island…

The Russian naval group was spotted just after elements of the Alaska-based 11th Airborne Division surged a force projection task force to Shemya Island in the Western Aleutians.

The airmailed group included a HIMARS and AN/TPQ-53 (Q-53) Multi-Mission Radar, delivered via C-17 Globemaster.

HIMARS has a published range of 130 or so miles while the Q-53 is limited to closer to 30-40. 

Still, it sends a message. 

U.S. Army soldiers assigned to Radar Platoon, 2nd Battalion, 377th Parachute Field Artillery Regiment, 2nd Infantry Brigade Combat Team (Airborne), 11th Airborne Division, orient a Q-53 Radar on Shemya Island, Alaska as part of a force projection operation, Sept. 13, 2024. The operation to the remote island in the North Pacific Ocean demonstrates the division’s ability to project power quickly and effectively, throughout the Indo-Pacific, assuring allies and partner nations in the region. (Photo Credit: U.S. Army photo by Spc. Brandon Vasquez)

U.S. Army Soldiers assigned to Alpha Battery, 5th Battalion, 3rd Field Artillery Regiment (Long Range Fires Battalion), 1st Multi-Domain Task Force, based at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington, setup communication systems for the M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) as part of the 11th Airborne Division’s force projection operation to Shemya Island, Alaska Sept. 12, 2024. The division’s ability to project power quickly and effectively assures allies and partner nations in the Indo-Pacific, and is the key to the strength of partnerships and relationships in the region. (U.S. Army photo by Spc. Brandon Vasquez) (Photo Credit: U.S. Army photo by Spc. Brandon Vasquez)

Citadel Echoes

As military history buffs, you have to appreciate the sublime irony of German Bundeswehr staff officers analyzing the Ukrainian Army’s offensive operations into the Kursk region, with Unternehmen Zitadelle now some 81 years in the rearview.

If there is anyone who knows what not to do with armor around Kursk, it is probably the Germans.

The Many Faces of the Kreuzer Augsburg

Commissioned in 1908, the SMS Augsburg, one of four Kolberg-class light cruisers in the Kaiserliche Marine, had been detailed to train torpedo and gun crews for the High Seas Fleet. Meanwhile, her three sisters, Kolberg, Mainz, and Cöln were assigned to the II Scouting Group and made ready to fight the British once the lights went out in Europe.

Fate being a funny thing, Augsburg was able to get into combat before her sisters when, on the night of 2 August 1914, the second day of the Great War, detailed along with the light cruiser Magdeburg, she bombarded the Russian harbor of Libau (today’s Liepaja, Latvia). She also apparently crossed swords with one of the Tsar’s torpedo boats, with neither suffering any reportable damage.

Augsburg famously wired in the open a series of three messages, which were duly picked up in neutral Sweden and Denmark and repeated worldwide:

“Am bombarding the naval harbor at Libau on the Baltic Sea.”

“Am engaged with enemy’s cruiser.”

“Port Libau is in flames.”

The Russians quickly did damage control, and reported that Libau only suffered minor damage and counterclaimed a heroic torpedo boat had sent Augsburg to the bottom before she could flee into the night.

One of the first naval actions of the war, German artists made sure to flood the market with celebratory martial postcards and pulp illustrations which were duly snapped up and kept for generations.

To be sure, each embellished the “battle.”

Kreuzer Augsburg beschiesst Libau Magdeburg Wilhelm Jonas

Kreuzer Augsburg beschiesst Libau Magdeburg Hans Bohrdt

Note that she now only has two large funnels rather than three thin ones, and sports a profile more akin to a Nassau-class battleship

Kreuzer Augsburg beschiesst Libau Magdeburg, Harry Heusser

Kleinen Kreuzer SMS AUGSBURG. Illustrierte Geschichte des Weltkrieges 1914-15

Kreuzer Augsburg beschiesst Libau, C Schon, Berlin August 1914

Kreuzer Augsburg beschiesst Libau, Willy Stower, 1915

Der Krieg 1914-19 in Wort und Bild, published 1919,

Moving past her minor engagement at Libau, Augsburg held on to her luck. While she was reported sunk at least two other times by the Russians in the course of the war, and two of her sisters (Cöln and Mainz) actually were sent to the bottom by the Royal Navy, the postcard hero survived the war, albeit flying a red flag for the last few weeks of it.

Post-Versailles, Augsburg was awarded to Japan as a war prize ship “Y” but the Emperor had no use for her and she was immediately sold for scrap, never leaving Europe.

Everlasting Konstantinovs

An ancient 2-inch Konstantinov unguided rocket set up before Russian trenches, likely on the Caucus Front, circa 1915-1916.

Designed in the early 1850s by Lt. Gen. Konstantin Konstantinovich Konstantinov– an illegitimate son of the younger brother of Russian Emperor Alexander I– the Konstantinov rocket was considered more advanced in terms of performance and payload to the British Congreve rockets of the day.

By the Crimean War, the Russian Imperial Army adopted 2-inch, 2.5-inch, and 4-inch rockets of his design in fragmentation and incendiary variants which far outclassed field artillery of the day. For reference, the 4-inch rocket, loaded with a 10-pound frag grenade, had a maximum firing range of 4,150 m. By comparison, a 10-pounder Parrott rifle only had an effective range of about 1,700 m. Further, they could be ripple-fired as many as 36 rockets in a single salvo, forming a kill box. 

The Russians had some 23.000 Konstantinov rockets on hand by the Crimean War and used them during the siege of Sevastopol– fired from the roofs and upper floors of buildings to strike British lines– and at Revel in the Baltic against ships of the Royal Navy,

By 1898, advances in field artillery had eclipsed their niche usefulness. They were withdrawn from service, and the last rocket batteries disbanded. 

However, we all know the Russians never throw anything away when it comes to ordnance and, as seen above, Konstantinovs popped up again in the Great War.

Further, there is some anecdotal evidence the Finns still had a few of them in inventory during WWII, no doubt inherited from Tsarist stocks left behind in the former Grand Duchy in 1917.

Raketti vie 1300 valistusta ja uutisia sis�lt�vi� lentolehtisi� naapurin puolelle.

Classified by the Finns as fortress rockets (Linnoitusraketti) there are pictures of them being used to harass Soviet lines in 1941 near Hanko (Hango), some 90 years after they were introduced. 

Linnoitusraketti valmiina lentämään. Hangon rintama 1941.09.20

The rocket takes off (night view) from the rock of the island over the back to the neighbor’s island across the border of the rental area. Hanko front 1941.09.20

The rocket has launched. Hanko front 1941.01.01

The Finns liked them so much that they went on to make an even more rudimentary version to carry propaganda leaflets (Propagandalehtisiä Lähetetään Raketin).

“Sending propaganda rockets: Situational information with local news is delivered to the neighbor’s side by rockets. According to the prisoners, the news delivered in this way is read carefully, because this news through us arrives much faster than the prisoners’ own situational information about the day’s events. Valkeajärvi (Uhtua direction) 1941.10.28”

Warship Wednesday, July 17, 2024: Under Four Flags

Here at LSOZI, we take off every Wednesday for a look at the old steam/diesel navies of the 1833-1954 period and will profile a different ship each week. These ships have a life, a tale all their own, which sometimes takes them to the strangest places.- Christopher Eger

If you enjoy my always ad-free Warship Wednesday content, you can support it by buying me a cup of joe at https://buymeacoffee.com/lsozi

Warship Wednesday, July 17, 2024: Under Four Flags

Above we see the sailors of the Northern Red Banner Fleet loading the 24-spigot Hedgehog ASW device on their new (to them) Wickes/Town-class destroyer, Zhivuchy/Zhguchiy (“Tenacious”), which they took over from the British some 80 years ago this week, on 16 July 1944.

By this point in the war– her second– she had already passed through American, British, and Canadian hands and still had some fighting left on her dance card.

The Wickes

Our ship was one of the iconic first flights of “Four Piper” destroyers that were designed in 1915-16 with input from no less an authority as Captain (later Admiral) W.S. Sims. Beamy ships with a flush deck and a quartet of boilers (with a smokestack for each) were coupled to a pair of Parsons geared turbines to provide 35.3 knots designed speed– which is still considered fast today, more than a century later.

The teeth of these 314-foot, 1,250-ton greyhounds were four 4-inch/50 cal MK 9 guns and a full dozen 21-inch torpedo tubes.

They reportedly had short legs and were very wet, which made long-range operations a problem, but they gave a good account of themselves. Originally a class of 50 was authorized in 1916, but once the U.S. entered WWI in April 1917, this was soon increased and increased again to some 111 ships built by 1920.

Wickes class USS Yarnall (DD-143): Booklet of General Plans – Inboard Profile / Outboard Profile, June 10, 1918, NARA NAID: 158704871

Wickes class USS Yarnall (DD-143): Booklet of General Plans – Main Deck / 1st Platform Deck / S’ch L’t P’f’m, S’ch L’t Control P’f’m, Fire Control P’f’m Bridge, Galley Top, After Dk. House and 2nd Platform Deck. / June 10, 1918, Hold NARA NAID: 158704873

Wickes class. A close-up of her stern top-down view of plans shows the Wickes class’s primary armament– a dozen torpedo tubes in four turnstiles and stern depth charges.

Of the 111 Wickes completed, there were three subclasses besides the 38 standard-design vessels built at Bath Iron Works, Cramp, Mare Island, and Charleston. Then came the 52 Bethlehem-designed ships built at the company’s Fore River (26 ships) and Union Iron Works (26 ships) led by USS Little, the Newport News-built variants (11 ships) starting with USS Lamberton, and New York Shipbuilding-built variants (10 ships) led by USS Tattnall.

The subclasses were constructed to a slightly different set of plans modified by their respective builders, which made for some downright confusing modifications later. In addition, the Bethlehem-designed Little variants tended to have shorter legs and proved unable to cross the Atlantic in a single hop without stopping in the Azores for refueling or completing an underway replenishment.

Anyway…

Meet Fairfax

Our subject, USS Fairfax (Destroyer # 93), was the first ship named in honor of Virginia-born RADM Donald McNeil Fairfax whose distinguished service in the Civil War included command of USS Cayuga, Nantucket, and Montauk.

Rear Admiral Fairfax, seen as an LCDR/CDR above, served with distinction in the Civil War and retired on 30 September 1881 after 43 years of service. He died at Hagerstown, Maryland, on 10 January 1894, aged 75.

Our tin can was laid down on 10 July 1917 at Vallejo by the Mare Island Navy Yard; named Fairfax (Destroyer No. 93) on 14 July 1917 in General Order No. 311; launched on 15 December 1917; sponsored by the daughter of the yard commandant.

The future USS Fairfax (Destroyer # 93) is being prepared for launching, at the Mare Island Navy Yard, California, circa 15 December 1917. NH 70607

Fairfax was commissioned on 6 April 1918, almost a year to the day that America entered the Great War.

She was beautiful in her original dazzle pattern war paint.

Possibly the best Wickes class profile I’ve ever seen. USS Fairfax (Destroyer # 93) at anchor in the San Francisco Bay area, 21 May 1918. Photographed by the Mare Island Navy Yard during the ship’s trials. NH 2025

USS Fairfax (Destroyer # 93) making smoke while steaming at 25 knots during trials in the San Francisco Bay area, 21 May 1918. NH 55612

USS Fairfax (Destroyer # 93) making smoke while running at 25 knots, during trials in the San Francisco Bay area, 21 May 1918. Photographed by the Mare Island Navy Yard. Note this ship’s pattern camouflage. NH 23

USS Fairfax (Destroyer # 93) at anchor in the San Francisco Bay area, 21 May 1918. Photographed by the Mare Island Navy Yard during the ship’s trials. NH 54131

USS Fairfax (Destroyer # 93) at anchor in the San Francisco Bay area, 21 May 1918. NH 54132

War!

A war baby born an ocean away from the fighting, Fairfax soon found herself with orders for Hampton Roads, where she arrived in early June to escort a convoy across the Atlantic, a role she would continue for the rest of the year.

Destroyers Israel and Fairfax with battleship Virginia in the distance. NH 109504

U.S. Navy Destroyer on convoy duty in 1918. This ship may be USS Fairfax (Destroyer # 93), whose camouflage scheme was very similar, though not identical, to that seen here. Courtesy of Jack L. Howland, 1983. NH 95211

While on a Hampton Roads to Brest convoy on 18 October, she raced to a distress signal from the 6,744-ton American cargo ship SS Lucia, torpedoed and sunk by the German submarine SM U-155 (ex-Deutschland, Korvettenkapitan Ferdinand Studt, commanding) some 1,200 miles off the U.S. East Coast.

SS Lucia, built in 1912, was an Austrian-flagged merchant ship that was interned at Mobile, Alabama in 1914 while the U.S. was still The Great Neutral. Seized by the United States Government in April 1917, she was operated by the U.S. Shipping Board and later by the U.S. Army Quartermaster Corps as ID # 3090. Signal Corps Photo # 165-WW 274A-10 while in Mobile, circa 1917, via NARA.

S.S. Lucia (Austrian/American Freighter, 1912) sinking in the western Atlantic after she was torpedoed by the German submarine U-155, on 17 October 1918. A boatload of survivors is in the process of leaving the ship. This ship was intended to become USS Lucia (ID # 3090) but was lost before the Navy could acquire her. Donation of Dr. Mark Kulikowski, 2005. NH 51459-A

Luckily, Lucia took 22 slow hours to submerge fully, allowing Fairfax to rescue 86 survivors. The only souls lost were four killed in the torpedo explosion. The steamer had been fitted at great cost with controversial Donnelly buoyancy boxes that made her “unsinkable,” which may have had something to do with her slow death.

USS Fairfax Description: (Destroyer # 93) underway with the survivors of S.S. Lucia on board, circa 18 October 1918. They were later transferred to the USS Huntington (Armored Cruiser # 5). NH 54134

Sinking of S.S. Lucia 17 October 1918. Motor launch arrives alongside USS Fairfax (Destroyer # 93) with a load of survivors from the American steamship Lucia. This boat is from the USS Huntington (Armored Cruiser # 5). NH 41727

Sinking of S.S. Lucia 17 October 1918. Motor launch from USS Huntington (Armored Cruiser # 5) leaving USS Fairfax (Destroyer # 93) with survivors from the American steamship Lucia. Fairfax is visible in the background. NH 41728

Immediately after the conflict came to a halt, Fairfax remained overseas, and, on 3 December 1918, she deployed to the Azores to the troop transport George Washington (Id. No. 3018) carrying President Woodrow Wilson, and escort her to Brest so that Wilson could attend the Versailles Peace Conference.

USS Fairfax (Destroyer # 93) view of the ship’s forward and midship superstructure, probably taken at Brest, France, in late 1918 after she shed her camouflage. Photographed by Zimmer. Note the small identification number painted below her pilothouse, canvas weather screens, and the 1-pounder automatic anti-aircraft gun mounted by her forward smokestacks. NH 54135

USS Fairfax (Destroyer # 93) in harbor, circa late 1918. Photographed by Zimmer. NH 54136

That mission completed, she sailed for home on 28 December, arriving at Norfolk on 8 January 1919.

Quiet Peacetime Interlude

No more camo! USS Fairfax (Destroyer # 93) at anchor, 11 October 1919. NH 54137

While many of the Navy’s new Wickes-class destroyers were soon mothballed following the “War to End all Wars”– and many of those later disposed of or converted to other roles such as minelaying/sweeping or tending seaplanes in the 1920s and 30s– the sun shined on Fairfax and, after helping shepherd the historic first aerial crossing of the Atlantic made by Navy seaplanes (towing the crippled NC-1 to shore), she was only laid up for not quite eight years, from 19 June 1922 to 1 May 1930, then recommissioned.

Incidentally, it was in 1920 that she served as the first command of LCDR (later VADM) Willis Augustus (Ching) Lee Jr. (USNA 1908), just after Lee returned from winning seven medals in the 1920 Antwerp Olympics and two decades before he would teach the Japanese just how good radar-controlled gunnery can be at night.

Once brought out of her short stint in mothballs, Fairfax’s peacetime role consisted primarily of conducting training cruises for both East and West Coast members of the Naval Reserve and summer cruises out of Annapolis carrying midshipmen of the U.S. Naval Academy to the Caribbean. She alternated this duty with regular gunnery exercises, fleet reviews, and fleet problems, a stint with the Special Service Squadron out of Balboa in the Canal Zone, and patrols in Cuban waters.

She was captured alongside at Annapolis on 18 March 1939 when the remains of Hiroshi Saito, the late Japanese Ambassador to the United States, were transferred to the cruiser USS Astoria (CA-34) for return to Japan.

Note the large hull numbers. Page from the Japan Times Weekly, published in Tokyo, 20 April 1939, page 523, NH 76141

She also participated in the 1939 New York City World’s Fair.

USS Fairfax (DD-93) at Poughkeepsie, New York, 17 June 1939. Courtesy of Donald M. McPherson, 1969. NH 67728

War, again

When Europe blew the lights out again in September 1939, Fairfax was assigned to the increasingly tense Atlantic neutrality patrol.

All was not calm on this duty, and a sistership, USS Greer (DD–145), was fired upon by German submarine U-652 in September 1941, leading to FDR’s “shoot on sight” order for threatening ships under American escort while supposedly at peace. The next month the destroyer USS Reuben James (DD-245) was sunk by U-552 near Iceland, still six weeks before the attack on Pearl Harbor.

However, by that point, Fairfax had already been transferred to the Admiralty.

White Ensign

With Europe again at war, on 2 September 1940, FDR signed the so-called Destroyers for Bases Agreement that saw a mix of 50 (mostly mothballed) Caldwell (3), Wickes (27), and Clemson (20)-class destroyers transferred to the Royal Navy in exchange for limited basing rights on nine British overseas possessions. Canada would receive seven of these ships including five Wickes, doubling the number of destroyers in the Canadian Navy in days. 

In respect of Canada’s naming tradition for destroyers, all seven RCN flush deckers were named for Canadian rivers (repeated in 2024 by the way), ideally, those that ran in conjunction with the U.S. border, a nice touch. In British service, they would receive names of small cities, and be known therefore as the Town class.

Sailed by scratch USN crews from Philadelphia the “flush deckers” sailed to Halifax in several small groups to prepare for a warm handover.  

Transfer of U.S. destroyers to the Royal Navy in Halifax, Sept 1940. Wickes-class destroyers USS Buchanan (DD-131), USS Crowninshield (DD-134), and USS Abel P. Upshur (DD-193) are in the background. The sailors are examining a 4-inch /50-cal deck gun. Twenty-three Wickes-class destroyers were transferred to the RN, along with four to the RCN, in 1940 under the Destroyers for Bases Agreement. (Library and Archives Canada Photo, MIKAN No. 3199286)

Group of U.S. Navy and Royal Navy ratings who took part in the transfer of destroyers to the Royal Navy and Royal Canadian Navy, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, ca. 23-24 September 1940. LAC A104093

Naval ratings unloading a torpedo before the refit of an unidentified Town-class destroyer of the Royal Canadian Navy, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, March 1941. LAC A105202

Ratings of the Royal Navy taking over former U.S.N. destroyer at Halifax, 1940. LAC A104109

Union Jacks hoisted aboard former U.S.N. destroyers transferred to the Royal Navy, Halifax, 1940. LAC A104096

Decommissioned from the U.S. Navy on 23 October 1940 (she wasn’t struck from the U.S. Navy List until 8 January 1941), Fairfax was taken into custody by RCN personnel in Halifax on 26 November 1940, pending the arrival of an RN crew that would take her to St. Johns for repairs and across the Atlantic to Devonport for fitting British equipment.

During this period, she was commissioned as the sixth HMS Richmond (G 88) on the RN’s list going back to 1655. As such, she carried forth a trio of previous battle honors from those vessels: Quebec, 1759 – Havana, 1762, and Chesapeake, 1781.

Ready for action by June 1941, she was assigned to the 17th Escort Group based in Newfoundland and would ride shotgun on 11 convoys by the end of the year (HX 132, SC 034, OB 339, SC 037, HX 138, ON 001, TC 012B, HX 148, ON 017, SC 047, SC 048, and UR 017).

HMS Richmond G88 passing McNab’s Island, Halifax, NS, via Forposterity’s Sake

In her first convoy of 1942, UR 017, she had the misfortune of encountering the 10,000-ton type EC2-S-C1 Liberty ship SS Francis Scott Key, which crumpled her bow on 31 March 1942. This forced her to Liverpool for five months of repair, after which she was sent back to Halifax to rejoin her convoy defense mission. However, this was cut short when she suffered a collision with the Norwegian cargo steamer SS Reinholt (4801 gt), sending her back to Liverpool for repairs until June 1943.

Oh, Canada

Sent to Halifax once again to get back to convoy work, the twice-cracked Fairfax/Richmond was sheep-dipped into the Royal Canadian Navy, becoming HCMS Richmond in July 1943.

While in Canuk service, she chalked up another nine convoy runs (ON 198, ONS 016, HX 255, SC 142, ONS 018, XB 076, ON 204, HX 262, and ON 207) between just 22 August and Halloween.

The Red Banner

With the Soviets pouting over not getting an immediate slice of the surrendered/interned Italian Navy in late 1943, the Western Allies made a big push to send a nice package of mixed destroyers, submarines, subchasers, cruisers (USS Milwaukee), and even battleships (HMS Royal Sovereign) to appease Stalin. Of course, many of these ships were extremely worn out, mechanically unreliable, and had been repeatedly repaired– so you know Fairfax/Richmond was lumped into this bag.

With that, Fairfax reverted to RN service, arrived back in the Home Isles on 27 December 1943, was paid off, de-stored, and laid up in the Tyne where she sat until taken up by Palmer’s Yard for a brief refit pending transfer to the Russkis.

Her new crew arrived in early July for a fortnight of training on their new vessels, and, officially transferred on 16 July 1944 as Zhivuchy (011), after the name of a destroyer sunk in the Black Sea in 1916, she set out the next day for Loch Ewe as escort for HMS Royal Sovereign (now dubbed Archangelsk), along with seven other high-mileage Wickes/Clemson tin cans that had been part of the Bases for Destroyers deal (Derzkij, Dejatelnyj, Doblestnyj, Dostojnyj, Zarkij, Zguchij, and Zostkij), and 11 SC-497 class 105-foot subchasers. Interestingly, these “Town” class Wickes/Clemsons would be known as the Zhivuchy-class in Soviet service. 

Tagging along with the 33-ship RN convoy JW59 for the White Sea, this little hodge podge of most third-hand warships sortied from Loch Ewe on 15 August and arrived in Soviet waters at the Kola Inlet ten days later. In the running ASW battle to get there, the convoy lost the British sloop HMS Kite (U 87) to U-344 (ace Kptlt. Ulrich Pietsch) which was in turn sunk by a Swordfish from the jeep carrier HMS Vindex (D 15). As a bonus, U-354 (ace Oblt. Hans-Jürgen Sthamer) was sunk on 24 August by HMS Mermaid and HMS Loch Dunvegan.

In Soviet service, Fairfax/Richmond/Zhivuchy, under Captain 3rd Rank Nikolay Dmitriyevich Ryabchenko, spent her career in ASW patrols in the frozen Barents and White Seas. While on such a beat with Dejatelnyj (ex-HMS Churchill, ex-USS Herndon, ex-CG-17) on 8 December, they came across a German U-boat that they had been bird-dogging for three days. When the steel shark broke the surface, Ryabchenko ordered Zhivuchy to ram.

According to Russian sources, it is believed Zhivuchy sank U-387 (Kptlt. Rudolf Büchler) with all hands, although Western sources generally chalk that boat up to the British corvette HMS Bamborough Castle (K412), in roughly the same area at the same time.

Sadly, Dejatelnyj would be sunk just a month later on 16 January 1945 by U-956 (Mohs), taking the commander and 116 men with her. Only seven men were picked up by the Derzkij.

The Northern Fleet destroyer Zhivuchiy (011) is seen wearing her Soviet pennant.

As for the end of her career, the Soviets kept their Wickes/Clemsons for several years after VJ-Day, even if they didn’t need them. Heck, the last one wasn’t returned until 1952!

Fairfax/Richmond/Zhivuchy was eventually repatriated to Rosyth in poor condition on 24 September 1949, scheduled immediately for disposal, and then broken up for scrap by BISCO at Grangemouth the following summer.

She earned two battle honors while under British/Canadian service: Atlantic 1941-43 – Arctic 1942.

Epilogue

Few relics remain of Fairfax. Her engineering drawings and some logs are in the National Archives.

Neither the U.S. nor Canadian fleets have added a second Fairfax or Richmond to their naval lists, however, the Royal Navy has commissioned a seventh Richmond, a Type 23 frigate (F239) that has been in service since 1995.

020612-N-9407M-518 The Atlantic Ocean (Jun. 11, 2002) — British frigate HMS Richmond (F-239) launches an AGM-84A “Harpoon” missile during a joint U.S. and British exercise in which the decommissioned ship USS Wainwright was sunk in the Atlantic Ocean. Ships used in these types of exercises are inspected and made environmentally safe before sinking, and are disguised to create reefs for marine life. U.S. Navy photo by Photographer’s Mate 2nd Class Isaac Merriman. (RELEASED)

She recently deployed to the Red Sea and fired the first Sea Ceptor combat launch in RN history.


Ships are more than steel
and wood
And heart of burning coal,
For those who sail upon
them know
That some ships have a
soul.


If you liked this column, please consider joining the International Naval Research Organization (INRO), Publishers of Warship International.

They are possibly one of the best sources of naval study, images, and fellowship you can find. http://www.warship.org/membership.htm

The International Naval Research Organization is a non-profit corporation dedicated to the encouragement of the study of naval vessels and their histories, principally in the era of iron and steel warships (about 1860 to date). Its purpose is to provide information and a means of contact for those interested in warships.

With more than 50 years of scholarship, Warship International, the written tome of the INRO has published hundreds of articles, most of which are unique in their sweep and subject.

PRINT still has its place. If you LOVE warships you should belong.

I’m a member, so should you be!

Finnish forest leaves

80 years ago, during the Finnish Continuation War against the Soviets, showing camouflaged Finnish troops outside the Karelian village of Vitele (Sotilaskasvoja Ylä-Vitele), 28 June 1944.

SA-Kuva image 154907_151418

Of note, the soldier to the left has what appears to be a Finnish-made Mosin m/39 rifle while the one on the left has a shorter m/27 or m/28 variant, with a “dog collar” sling attachment. Also, note what looks like a Finnish m/28 mess kit.

Captured during the Finnish offensive in July 1941, the Finns at the time of these photos were in the process of pulling back all along the collapsing Karelian Front as the Soviets advanced, as witnessed by what may be the same soldier in the nearby burning village of Suurmäki on 29 June.

SA-Kuva image 154968_151479

Hostilities between Finland and the Soviets ceased in early September 1944 after the Moscow Armistice guaranteed Finland’s 1940 borders sans the Barents Sea port of Petsamo and a lease on the Porkkala Peninsula. This led to a rapid recalibration in which the Finns harassed the retreating 200,000 German troops in the country– mostly the 20. Gebirgsarmee— as they retired to Norway during the so-called Lapland War which would simmer until April 1945.

Son of the Regiment, T-34 edition

80 years ago today, 27 June 1944. Tankers of the 17th Guard Tank Brigade, 1st Guard Tank Corps, 1st Belarusian Front, on their T-34-85.

On the photo from left to right: Senior Sergeant Boris Vorontsov – tank driver; Alik – сын полка (syn polka= son of the regiment); Jr. LT Vladimir Viktorovich Ponomarev, tank commander. To the rear of Ponomarev is Jr. LT Gennady Fatysov, a friend of his from the Kurgan Tank School.

This is the last shot of Ponomarev who was killed less than a month later, on 25 July, in the battle for Brest, in the area of the Bialostok-Brest highway, near the village of Cheremkha in Poland. He was awarded the Order of the Great Patriotic War and the Order of the Red Star (posthumously).

As for Alik, the son of the regiment was lost to history, as they have almost always been going back to the days of the Romans and Greeks.

He reminds me of George Dzundza’s Commander Daskal in The Beast, who retells a story of how he was a Molotov-wielding 8-year-old lad in Stalingrad who earned the moniker, “Tank Boy.”

According to the Central Archive of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, during WWII there were at least 3,500 front-line soldiers under the age of sixteen, a figure that did not include those in irregular underground and partisan detachments. This number is likely a drastic undercount as commanders typically did not list these “tag-alongs” on unit rolls.

Nonetheless, they often gave their all, with one youth, six-year-old Sergei Aleshkov, being decorated in combat with the 142nd Guards Rifle Regiment, which he served with for eight months across 1942-43, including being wounded and instrumental in digging out a blocked bunker entrance.

A Strange Tale of Two Multi-Flag Dreadnoughts

Some 105 years ago this month, check out these two snapshots of brand-new battleships under construction on two different sides of Europe. Ordered by two doomed empires with the very likely prospect of fighting each other at sea, that never happened, and each saw its own fate under far different circumstances.

On the Neva River outside of St. Petersburg at the Tsar’s Admiralty Shipyard, we see this June 1914 shot of the leader of her class of dreadnoughts– the first for Imperial Russia– the Gangut, shown fitting out.

At 25,000 tons and with a main battery of a dozen Obukhovskii 12-inch/52-caliber Pattern 1907 guns in four triple turrets, Gangut could make 24 knots and was protected by as much as 10 inches of armor plate, although with a rather light battle cruiser-ish 5-to-9-inch main belt.

Next, at the Vickers yard at Barrow-in-Furness in England, is the Ottoman Empire’s shiny future battleship Reşadiye (left) next to the HM’s battleship Emperor of India (right), in June 1914.

Like Gangut, Reşadiye was the leader of her planned class of new dreadnoughts, the first for the Turks, and went 25,000 tons. Slower than Gangut (21 knots) she had much better armor (12-inch belt) and, while she had fewer main guns (10) they were more powerful Vickers Elswick BL 13.5-inch Mk VIs.

It would have been an interesting match-up if the two ever met on the open seas in a one-on-one surface engagement.

Of course, that never happened.

Gangut would go on to be commissioned in January 1915 and serve in the Baltic Sea Fleet where, in 1917, the revolution brought the hangman’s noose and firing squad to many of her officers as her men were dispatched throughout the Worker’s Paradise to fight ashore as Red naval infantry during the Russian Civil War.

Renamed Oktyabrskaya Revolutsiya, she was repaired enough to be put back into service with the Red Banner Fleet by 1925. Reconstructed in the 1930s, she would be an indestructible thorn in the Germans’ side during the siege of Leningrad and, somehow surviving the war, would endure until scrapped in the 1950s. 

Gangut in 1915, once completed

She never fought an outright capital ship surface engagement.

Meanwhile, Reşadiye, ordered in 1911, launched in the late summer of 1913 and completed by July 1914– fully paid for by the Sultan’s government and completed her builder’s sea trials– was instead seized under the First Sea Lord’s orders with the Great War on the horizon and, in August 1914, put into service with the Royal Navy as HMS Erin. This is often credited with being one of the final straws that pushed the Turks and Germans together.

Ironically, while at Jutland, Erin was the only British battleship not to fire her main guns during the massive sea clash!

HMS Erin in a North Sea harbor, with a kite balloon moored aft, 1918

A unique ship and curious ship in a fleet flush with several classes of great dreadnoughts, she was discarded in 1922.

Warship Wednesday May 29, 2024: The Blue Beauty of Sevastopol

Here at LSOZI, we take off every Wednesday for a look at the old steam/diesel navies of the 1833-1954 period and will profile a different ship each week. These ships have a life, a tale all their own, which sometimes takes them to the strangest places.- Christopher Eger

Warship Wednesday May 29, 2024: The Blue Beauty

Via the Archivio di Stato di Livorno

Above we see the sleek and elegant, almost light cruiser lines, of the Italian-built one-of-a-kind Soviet Red Banner Fleet’s Project 20I destroyer leader Tashkent, seen near La Spezia on 11 March 1938 during sea trials in which she would reportedly top 43.53 knots– a blistering speed for any warship of any class. You will note that her armament isn’t installed and she is in a very light condition (3,422 tons vs 4,175 full) however, once her guns and torpedo tubes were mounted and she went for speed trials, she still logged 42.7 knots, raising eyebrows around the globe.

Project 20I

The Russian Navy fell in love with large (for their day), light cruiser-sized, very fast destroyers going back to 1910’s Novik (1,620 t, 335 feet oal, 4x 4″, 8 x tt, 37.3 knots) and the earlier circa 1898 trio of Novik/Izumrud class scout cruisers (3,080 t, 360 feet oal, 6x 4.7″, 5 x tt, 25.8 knots).

Novik was a great destroyer for 1910. At some 1,600-tons full load, he could make 37.3 knots, which is still fast for a destroyer today, and carried four twin 18-inch torpedo tubes (eight tubes total) as well as four 4-inch guns.

With the Russian fleet all but destroyed during the Great War and the follow-on civil war that engulfed the world’s largest country from 1914 through 1922, followed by a half-decade of crippling famine and depression, as part of Stalin’s First Five Year Plan in 1928 a half-dozen Project 1/38 destroyer leaders were ordered to help rebuild. Better known as the Leningrad/Minsk class, they were the largest warships (2,350 tons, 418 feet oal) constructed in the Soviet Union at the time. Speedy ships, capable of some 40 knots, they carried five new pattern 5.1″/50 B-13 guns, eight torpedo tubes, mines, and depth charges, giving them a decent punch. However, they were miserable sea boats with a top-heavy design that made them pitch in almost any sea state outside of a flat calm.

As the Soviets were working with both Germany and Italy throughout the 1920s and 30s on several often murky rearmament initiatives, and Moscow was working with the latter on the Kirov/Maxim Gorky-class (Project 26) “medium” cruisers, went with the spaghetti option for a better-designed destroyer leader.

With high speed, stability, and the same rough armament as the Project 1/38 destroyer leaders as a baseline, the 54.6 million lire Project 20I design submitted by Odero-Terni-Orlando, Livorno, went some 40 feet longer and 500 tons heavier than the Leningrads. A powerplant of British-made Yarrow boilers and Parsons turbines (rather than going with Italian competitor Ansaldo) had an expected capability of 100,000 shp but this reached 125,500 on trials.

Original drawings by Odero-Terni-Orlando Shipyards, Livorno, 1936, via the Archivio di Stato di Livorno

Original drawings by Odero-Terni-Orlando Shipyards, Livorno, 1936, via the Archivio di Stato di Livorno

Original drawings by Odero-Terni-Orlando Shipyards, Livorno, 1936, via the Archivio di Stato di Livorno

While the ship couldn’t keep up her 40+ knots speed for long, she could still eke out a 2,800 nm range at 25 knots or 5,030 nm at a speed of 20 knots, giving them legs enough for overseas work. As such, the Soviets planned a series of 12 Project 20Is (4 for the Pacific Fleet, 3 in the Baltic, 3 in the Black Sea, and 2 for the Northern Fleet ) with the class leader built at Livorno and the other 11 constructed in the Motherland at Yard No. 190 (Zhdanov, Leningrad) and No. 198 (Marti South, Nikolaev).

Armament, as designed, would be six 5.1″/50 guns in three twin B-2LM mounts, a twin 3″/50 ZAU 39-K AAA mount, a half dozen 37mm ZAU 70-K “Boforski” AAA singles, and provision for another half dozen of the country’s soon to be famous new 12.7mm DShK 56-P-542 guns.

A torpedo battery of nine 21-inch tubes in three triple turnstiles, with enough reloads to allow for 18 fish, gave her an offensive punch. She could also carry 110 Model 1931 sea mines on rails along with two stern depth charge racks for 20 small (50-pound charge) BM-1 and four large (300-pound charge) BB-1 style ash cans.

Torpedo tubes, Tashkent

Meet Tashkent

Our subject was named for the ancient Central Asian Silk Road city that is the current capital of Uzbekistan and was a traditional Russian naval warship name going back to an 89-ton armed gunboat on the Tsar’s Aral flotilla in the 1870s and a Bolshevik river gunboat of the Volga military flotilla during the Russian Civil War.

Ordered from OTO Livorno in September 1935 in conjunction with the NKTP, she was laid down in January 1937, launched that December, and accepted (unarmed) by Soviet representatives in March 1939. Her contract price was paid in a mix of French francs and British pounds sterling.

Russian destroyer Tashkent under construction at the OTO shipyard in Livorno, Italy in 1937

While it had been planned to send her to the Baltic Fleet where the Leningrad yard would have ready access to her while they made eight copies for service from Murmansk to Vladivostok, the fact that the toothless destroyer would have to transit Spanish waters– where German Kriegsmarine ships and Italian “pirate” submarines were operating in the tail end of the Spanish Civil War, led Moscow to order Tashkent to Odesa in the Black Sea.

Sailing sans any guns under the guise of a passenger ship– complete with a Sovtorgflot or Soviet Commercial Fleet flag, a partial Italian crew, and tarpaulins with faux portholes painted on them stretched across her superstructure– she passed through the Bosphorus and arrived in Odesa on 6 May 1939, turned over to the Soviet Navy some 85 years ago this month.

Following a series of workups after which her Italian contract yard personnel were released, she went to Nikolaev for a temporary armament fit that included old-style 5.1″/50 B-13 singles as her planned twin turrets weren’t yet available. She nonetheless kept her blueish-gray Italian livery until 1941, earning her the nickname of the “Goluboy kreyser” or Blue Cruiser.

You have to love those Italian cruiser lines

Destroyer Tashkent with initial 130-mm B-13 naval guns armament, 1940

War!

With Stalin and Hitler officially on the same side for the first 22 months of WWII, to the horror of Eastern Poland and the Baltics, Tashkent only got into the fighting past Barbarossa but she quickly made up for lost time.

Under Capt. (3rd rank) Vasily Nikolaevich Eroshenko (Frunze 1930), Tashkent was at Nikolaev, finally receiving her twin 5.1″/50 mounts and dark wartime scheme in June 1941 but soon was able to sortie to Sevastopol where she would lead a scratch destroyer squadron that included three smaller (2402 t) Russki Project 7 type tin cans– Bodriy, Besposhchadny, and Bditelny.

With her twin turrets installed

Dispatched to help defend threatened Odesa on 22 August, she spent a week there, delivering NGFS (540 5.1-inch shells) to Red Army troops fighting advancing German and Romanian divisions until she was damaged by a 12-bomb near miss from German bombers on 30 August that forced her to limp back to Sevastopol at 12 knots to repair split seams and flooding of frames 192-205. She left a detachment of her crew behind in Odessa to join the doomed 1st Naval Infantry (Marine) Regiment ashore.

Cobbled back together with cement and steel patches in drydock under a blacked-out camouflage screen with volunteer yard workers only allowed onboard after dark, and with the Germans advancing on the Crimea and isolating Sevastopol by early October, Tashkent was withdrawn with the rest of the fleet to the Eastern Black Sea.

Tashkent and submarine Shch-212 in Poti, Georgia 1942

Tashkent moored with the submarine D-5 6.26.1942

She soon returned in early December to land 700 tons of vitally-needed ammunition in the besieged city and in January came back to deliver a brigade of Siberian Riflemen from the newly formed 386th Rifle Division, on both runs remaining in the area pulling naval gunfire support until her 5-inch magazines were exhausted.

Ship’s boy Borya Kuleshin, later holder of the Order of the Red Star, aboard Tashkent, his PPShka at the ready.

Tashkent shelling German positions near Sevastopol, while still in the harbor

With Siberian Riflemen

Further resupply runs/NGFS stints to Sevastopol by Tashkent would occur regularly over the next five months, earning her legendary status as the guardian angel of the city. Her ability to make high-speed 30+ knot runs through the 250 sea miles from Novorossiysk to Sevastopol made her invaluable, akin to the Japanese cruisers and destroyers running supplies and troops via “The Slot” down the New Georgia Sound to Guadalcanal in 1942.

To be sure, other Black Sea ships of all stripes made similar runs, but none as many times as the Blue Cruiser, which in the spring and summer of 1942 would carry 19,300 troops to the city along with over 2,500 tons of munitions and supplies.

Her final blockade run on 26 June to Sevastopol brought 944 replacement soldiers, a half-battery of light field guns, 760 Mosin rifles, 125 PPSh burp guns, 20 tons of ammunition, 26 tons of food, and 4.5 tons of other vital cargo. She left just after midnight the next morning with a cargo of 2,100 evacuees, primarily women and children along with war correspondent and novelist Evgeny Petrovich Petrov.

Among her cargo were the panels of the huge circa 1904 panoramic painting “Defense of Sevastopol” of Crimean War fame by Franz Roubo.

Sevastopol fell within the week.

On her way to Novorossiysk at 33 knots, Tashkent was spotted just after dawn by Luftwaffe aircraft, and formations of Junkers Ju 87 Stuka and Ju 88 bombers soon began dropping strings of bombs across her path, with waves coming every 5-10 minutes for four hours.

According to Soviet reports, her crew counted 86 aircraft and 336 bombs which, while miraculously no direct hits were logged (although over 100 passengers were lost or wounded), the unarmored Italian stallion popped so many seams and buckled so many plates that she shipped 1,700 tons of water and buried her bow.

Still, she made it close enough to Novorossiysk by 0900 for ground-based Red Air Force planes to provide top cover against the bombers and, linking up with the Project 7U destroyer Sobrazitelny which offloaded several hundred refugees, made it to port– albeit under tow.

Tashkent is approaching the destroyer Sobrazitelny to reload evacuees from Sevastopol. June 27, 1942

Evacuees from Sevastopol move from the damaged destroyer leader Tashkent to the destroyer Soobrazitelny

There, the barely floating wreck unloaded the rest of her precious cargo and was inspected by the mustachioed commander of the North Caucasian Front, Marshal Semyon Budyonny of the old 1920s Konarmiya.

Semyon Budyonny aboard Tashkent

Five days later, a 64-bomber raid on Novorossiysk left Tashkent riddled with bombs and, suffering an explosion of her torpedo magazine, settled on the bottom with almost half of her crew dead, hospitalized, or missing.

Salvage divers found no less than seven large holes in her hull, ruling out a service return.

Her guns were able to be recovered and went on to partially arm the destroyers Ognevoy and Ozmotelny along with an ersatz armored train, while her crew went to other units, for instance, her skipper, Capt. Eroshenko, reporting to the old Svetlana-class cruiser Krasnyi Kavkaz (Red Caucasus, ex-Admiral Lazarev) as that ship’s skipper in August 1942.

He would survive the war and retire from service in 1960 following command of the cruiser Chkalov, elevated on the retired list to a rear admiral.

Eroshenko’s grave at the Serafimovskoye cemetery in St. Petersburg includes the Tashkent in profile. He passed in 1970 at 64 and held just about every decoration the state could bestow a sailor.

Tashkent would later be raised in late 1944, but it was only to salvage her for scrap.

 

Epilogue

Of Tashkent’s planned 11 Russian-made sisters, none took to the water.

No doubt building on lessons learned from the construction of Tashkent for the Russians, the Italians ordered a dozen very similar (5420t, 466 ft oal, 8 x 5.3″/45, 8 x tt, 41 knots) Capitani Romani class scout cruisers were ordered via OTO starting in 1939 but only four were competed.

The destroyer San Marco (D563) (ex Giulio Germanico from the Capitani Romani class) passes through Venice post-war, with American DP 5″/38s installed.

The Soviets recycled Tashkent’s name as a Kara-class (Project 1134B) ASW cruiser built at Nikolaev in the 1970s that remained in service until 1992. She was later sold to a breaker in India.

As seen from the screening destroyer USS John Young (DD 973), foreground, the Soviet large anti-submarine ship Tashkent during operations with the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70), circa 1985. USN Photo DN-SC-85-12178

Beyond that, our subject has numerous monuments and markers around the Black Sea area, postage stamps, and the like while the Black Sea Museum maintains a large-scale model and relics.

She has been extensively remembered in maritime art and model box art.

1940 destroyer Tashkent with B13 singles – box art Trumpeter

1942 Sevastopol siege era destroyer Tashkent – box art Trumpeter

Italian built Tashkent Soviet Russian navy destroyer leader in Black Sea WWII by Adam Werka

Tashkent’s last run

In 1970, the Leon Saakov-directed Mosfilm technicolor war drama, More v gone (“The Sea is On Fire”), recalled Tashkent’s last trip to Sevastopol and evac run to Novorossiysk and, while there is clearly a lot of up talk to the glorious worker’s paradise, is stirring and was made with lots of help from the Red Banner Fleet.


Ships are more than steel
and wood
And heart of burning coal,
For those who sail upon
them know
That some ships have a
soul.


If you liked this column, please consider joining the International Naval Research Organization (INRO), Publishers of Warship International

They are possibly one of the best sources of naval study, images, and fellowship. http://www.warship.org/membership.htm

The International Naval Research Organization is a non-profit corporation dedicated to the encouragement of the study of naval vessels and their histories, principally in the era of iron and steel warships (about 1860 to date). Its purpose is to provide information and a means of contact for those interested in warships.

With more than 50 years of scholarship, Warship International, the written tome of the INRO has published hundreds of articles, most of which are unique in their sweep and subject.

PRINT still has its place. If you LOVE warships you should belong.

I’m a member, so should you be!

Fighting with what you got

How about this shot, some 80 years ago this month, of Soviet Red Partisans during the liberation of the Crimean town of Bakhchysarai, April 1944. Drink in the diversity when it comes to hardware.

On the left is a 47-round pan magazine-fed Degtyaryov DP27/28 in the traditional Russki 7.62x54mmR caliber, then a German Maschinengewehr 13— an air-cooled conversion of the old water-cooled Dreyse Model 1918 in 8mm Mauser- with its distinctive 25-round horizontal box mag, as well as a Shpagin PPSh-41 burb gun in 7.62 Tok complete with its 71-round drum magazine. Talk about trouble for the supply guy!

The Reds fielded something like 800,000 partisans during the “Great Patriotic War.” 

Of sad note from this period about the above town itself, under German/Romanian occupation, Bakhchysarai was “cleansed” of its Jewish population, and then when the Reds came back, Uncle Joe in turn ordered all the local Crimean Tatars deported as “traitors.”

« Older Entries Recent Entries »