Category Archives: Tanks & AFV

With the Dragon Slayers

Lucky Number Three! Belgium. 12 January, 1945. 42nd Tank Battalion, 11th Armored Division. They keep their fingers crossed as this is their third tank since the 29th of December. The other two were shot out from under them, but they sustained no injuries. Left to right: Cpl. Cecil M. Lindsey, Springfield, Mo.; Cpl. Walter P. Waymer, Seymour, Conn.; Capt. John Megglesin, Aurora, Ill., all of the 42nd Tank Battalion, 11th Armored Division. Photographer: MacDonald. SC 335399.

23 April represents the observed 1,723rd anniversary of the execution in Nicomedia (modern-day İzmit, Turkey) of Nestor of Cappodocia, a Roman Army officer, punished by the Emperor Diocletian for not renouncing his religious faith.

He came to be known as “Saint George” by the Catholic Church. Over the years, legends grew that he appeared on horseback to save a village by slaying a Dragon.

Saint George Killing the Dragon, 1434, Bernat Martorell

Centuries later, Saint George has become the patron saint of many, including England.

But most importantly for the U.S. Army Armor Branch, Saint George is the only saint depicted fighting on horseback and thus is the patron saint of Cavalrymen and now modern Tankers and Cavalry Scouts.

The U.S. Cavalry and Armor Association honors old Nestor through the Honorable Order of Saint George, which, established in 1986, recognizes exceptional Tankers and Cavalrymen.

American Elephant Snipers

If you are a fan of U.S. military arms, especially of the 20th Century, you are well aware of Mr. Bruce Canfield.

The March American Rifleman has an article penned by Bruce on the Short Life of America’s Anti-Tank Rifles. Of note, he includes the early Browning .50-caliber AT variant, the Winchester Model 1918 .50-caliber High Power Bolt Action Swivel Gun, and the T1E1, a .60-caliber experimental design tested at Aberdeen Proving Ground in October 1942.

More here.

A Big Cat Returns to Familiar Stomping Grounds

The Bundeswehr has been showcasing modernized Kampfpanzer Leopard 1 A5s, revisiting the home team’s military training grounds.

Ausbildung ukrainischer Soldaten durch deutsche Streitkräfte am Kampfpanzer Leopard 1A5, auf dem Truppenübungsplatz Klietz, am 24.03.2026.

Ausbildung ukrainischer Soldaten durch deutsche Streitkräfte am Kampfpanzer Leopard 1A5, auf dem Truppenübungsplatz Klietz, am 24.03.2026.

Although the Cold War-era type ended production in 1984 and was decommissioned by the Germans in 2003, Ukrainian volunteers and conscripts are being trained on the vintage hull by soldiers of the Europäischen Ausbildungsmission (European Training Mission), or EUMAM UA.

Ausbildung ukrainischer Soldaten durch deutsche Streitkräfte am Kampfpanzer Leopard 1A5, auf dem Truppenübungsplatz Klietz, am 24.03.2026.

Ausbildung ukrainischer Soldaten durch deutsche Streitkräfte am Kampfpanzer Leopard 1A5, auf dem Truppenübungsplatz Klietz, am 24.03.2026.

Ausbildung ukrainischer Soldaten durch deutsche Streitkräfte am Kampfpanzer Leopard 1A5, auf dem Truppenübungsplatz Klietz, am 24.03.2026.

If the tanks look great, keep in mind that they had been well-maintained by their previous owners as investments, and when retired, were transferred to Rheinmetall and FFG to keep in controlled storage for potential future resale.

Instead of heading to Third World users, upwards of 200 such vehicles have been pledged to the Ukrainians from Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Germany.

Ukraine has received around 100 upgraded Leopard 1 A5 DK tanks from Denmark alone, which have been retrofitted with composite armor, laser rangefinders, thermal imaging optics, better commo, and modern night vision devices.

That, combined with the Leo’s stabilized 105mm L7A3 L/52 gun and well-trained crews, can make the old cat a bruiser against just about any Russian tank or armored vehicle encountered.

Despite the heavy drone-vs-drone nature of the fight in Ukraine, there is still plenty of room for armored forces.

With that being said, I would be remiss if I didn’t also note that work is simultaneously being done by John Cockerill Defence in Belgium to make remotely operated Leo 1s for Ukraine as well…

German Cold War-era Leopard 1 tank equipped with a modern Belgian remote-control turret, shown with a Ukrainian flag. This image is of a test vehicle modified by the Belgian turret specialist company John Cockerill Defence. (Image published by the Telegram channel BPMD, the official channel of the Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies, on March 16)

Time Slippin with the S-62

The late, great, Japanese martial artist/actor/director Shin’ichi “Sonny” Chiba is best known to younger audiences as Hattori Hanzō from Kill Bill, but to an older generation, he was remembered for his 1970s Street Fighter films.

One forgotten gem, 1979’s G.I. Samurai (aka Time Slip and Sengoku Self Defense Force) has just gotten a re-release via 4K Blu-ray restoration.

If you are a fan of 1980’s The Final Countdown, which sees USS Nimitz go back to Pearl Harbor on December 6, 1941, you will “get” the premise of G.I. Samurai, which sees a group of Japanese Ground Self-Defense Force soldiers time-warped back to 16th century Sengoku period Japan– with their weapons to include lots of M-3 Grease guns, Howa Type 64 battle rifles, a mocked up “Type 61” tank, and a Sea King that isn’t.

I say “mocked up” because the Japanese military disavowed the film and provided no support, leaving Toho to make their own tank– which doesn’t look half bad– turn to its armory of small arms left over from assorted Godzilla films, including some actual M-3s and Type 64s, and lease a helicopter that was sort of military.

The trailer:

The chopper is a Sikorsky S-62.

The company’s first amphibious helicopter, the S-62, entered service in 1958, beating the larger, more prolific, and much more familiar S-61 (which became the Sea King) by three years.

Sikorsky S-62 prototype CN 62-001, dom 1958, civil registration N880

Sikorsky S-62A prototype getting its water landing on…

Some 99 were delivered to the USCG, which flew the type as the HH-52A Seaguard (as 1352-1379, 1382-1413, 1415-1429, 1439-1450, and 1455-1466) until replaced by the decidedly non-amphibious HH-65 Dolphin (SA-365).

HH-52A 1357 Lake Ponchartrain September 23, 1964 NNAM No. 1993.501.073.231

All told, just 175 S-62s were constructed on both sides of the pond.

Some 25 Mitsubishi-built Sikorsky-licensed S-62Js were made for Japanese service, where they were nicknamed Raicho (Ptarmigan).

This included nine that served with the Japan Air Self-Defense Force (JASDF), another nine that served with the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force’s 51 Kokutai out of Atsugi Kaigun-hikōjō, and assorted SAR dets around the country from 1965 into the mid-1980s when replaced by UH-60s.

S-62J 8922

S-62J 8928

The Japanese Maritime Safety Agency (MSA), a coast guard unit, flew another eight U.S.-built S-62As, while at least eight other S-62A 10-seater commercial models flew with Japanese domestic airlines in the 1960s and 70s.

The GI Samurai S-62 looks like a commercial model mocked up in olive camo with “Ground Defense Force” written on the side, although the Japanese army never used the type. It also carries a five-digit civil number. Seen in one of the above images, her 005 tail number could be that of JA9005, an aircraft that flew with the Nakanihon Air Service, a general aviation company that is still around.

Note what looks like curtains visible in the window.

Other international users of the S-62 included the Philippine Air Force, the Royal Thai Police, the Indian Air Force, and the Icelandic Coast Guard.

Either way, you gotta love the time warp gimmick.

Does anyone know what watch that is?

Tin-clad porpoises

Some 75 years ago this week, IC-92646, an M8 Greyhound armored car of “Groupement Sizaire”, fords a river near Mao Khe in French Indochina, sometime between 31 March and 5 April 1951. Note on the front of the hull the anchor insignia of the French army’s colonial troops, a badge that earned such men the nickname “Marsouins” or porpoises.

ECPAD Réf. : TONK 51-37D R7

Colonel Robert Sizaire’s scratch Mobile Group (groupe de mobile, or GM) was formed in late January 1951 and was a two-battalion experimental blend of light infantry and light armor, with the former carried via halftracks and the latter built around 18-ton M-24 Chaffee (the French used  1,250 of the little “Cadillac tanks” in the 1950s-60s) and Greyhounds.

Crossing a bamboo bridge by the first elements of the “Sizaire” group armed with M24/29 FM LMG and MAS 36 rifles. Note the “Chapeau de Brousse” bush hats.

The M-24 Chaffee “Angouleme” of Group Sizaire, with riders from the 6th BPC (paras) and local Thai partisans (beret) differentiated from the bush-hatted tankers and grenadiers.

This could almost pass for Italy in 1944. However, it is the square at Sept Pagodes (now Phả Lại part of Hải Dương Province, in Vietnam’s Red River Delta) where the members of the “Sizaire” group are gathered, circa March 1951. Note six M-24 Chaffees, at least 13 M3 Half-Tracks, two Jeeps, and a GMC CCKW “Deuce-and-a-Half” 2.5-ton  6×6 truck

The Sizaire Group, combined with the 6th BPC (6th Colonial Parachute Battalion), platoon of the RICM (Colonial Infantry Regiment of Morocco), a company of African riflemen (from 30e Bataillon de marche de tirailleurs sénégalais), and Lt Nghiem Xuan Toan’s Tho partisan company, successfully defended the isolated Mao Khe and Ben Tam outposts on Provincial Route 18 (PR 18), between Bac Ninh and Hong Hai against a determined attack by the Viet Minh TD (Trung Doan) 36 and 209 regiments in between 29 March and 5 April– later reinforced by elements of three divisions– with the tanks being crucial in the counter-attack that broke the back of Giap’s guys.

Advance of M24 Chaffee tanks from the “Sizaire Group” towards Mao Khe across the Tonkin landscape. In the foreground, the M24 Chaffee “Metz” tank, bearing the number 5 on its turret.

Mao Khe with a knocked-out Sizaire Group Greyhound after the fighting.

The fighters of Dong Trieu (these are the first elements of the “Sizaire” group), the day after a night of fighting. In the background, a damaged watchtower. Note the bush hats, MAT-49s, and M1 Carbines.

While successful, the poor road network made even light armor problematic in Indochina– a boogeyman of later suffered by American/ARVN M-48s and M-113s– and Sizaire’s unit was soon broken apart and sent its separate way.

The M24 Chaffee “Angoulême” tank (registration number IC-93003) fell into the water when the scrap metal bridge collapsed.

The column of M24 Chaffee tanks, under the command of Colonel Sizaire, is stopped in April 1951. In the foreground, an M24 Chaffee tank is stuck in the mud, seen from above; it bears the number 6 on the turret; in the background, the M24 Chaffee tank registered IC-93016 and bearing the number 12 on the turret.

Who was Sizaire?

Colonel Sizaire at the wheel of a jeep, March 1951. His passenger is General de Lattre de Tassigny, at the time the French commander in Indochina. Note that Sizaire’s cap has the colonial troops’ anchor.

Born in 1904 in Nord-Pas-de-Calais, Sizaire’s father, Emile Vital Pascal Sizaire, was a literature professor in his 40s who left his position at the university to meet his death as a field officer at Verdun in 1916. Does it get any more old republic?

Our younger Sizaire went on to make the military his career. Enlisting as a volunteer in 1922, he fought against the Rif in Morocco, within a unit of Senegalese riflemen (23e RIC). Passing through Saint-Maixent in 1926, he served in a variety of positions in the colonial forces, taking his bride,  Lucienne, while stationed in Bamako (French Sudan) in 1931, before assignments in Algeria (1932) and Indochina (1935).

A junior officer during the Battle for France, leading a company of the 12th RTS (12e Regiment de Tirailleurs Senegalais), he was redeployed to Dakar and finally to Morocco under Vichy orders. Post Torch in November 1942, he cast his lot with De Gaulle and, as a battalion commander (Chef de Battalion) with colonials of the 4th RTS participated in the liberation of Corsica (Operation Vesuvius) in September 1943, the capture of the Italian island Elba in June 1944 (Operation Brassard)– his battalion capturing Monte Tambonne and the German batteries at Aquabonna– and the August 1944 Dragoon Landings which led to the liberation of Toulon and Southern France that August, picking up an American DSC in the process. After the Battle of Colmar in 1945, he finished WWII as the second in command of the 21e RIC (the old 4th RTS), standing on German soil.

It was as a colonel commanding the 21e RIC that he arrived in Indochina in April 1946, joining the fight against the Viet Minh. Once the 21e RIC was sent back “home” to Africa, Sizaire remained in-country as colonel of the newly arrived 3e RIC. Sent back to France in 1949, he flew back to Indochina to join his “Marsouins” in late January 1951, setting up his Groupement Sizaire as detailed above.

He went on to become the French commander in Laos (commandant les Forces du Laos) until January 1953.

Then came a brigadier’s star and command in Brazzaville for the next four years, where he helped stand up the army of the newly independent Congo. After serving as the commandant of the NATO Defense College in 1959, Lt. Gen. (Général de corps d’armée des troupes coloniales) Sizaire was moved to the retired list in 1964 after helping create and equip the Cameroonian Army. He held numerous decorations, including two Croix de Guerre, and was a Grand Officier of the Légion d’Honneur

He then spent a decade as mayor of Cayeux-sur-Mer. He passed in Picardy on a Saturday in the summer of 1975, aged 71, leaving behind three children and a host of grandchildren.

TOW MUTT

Taking you back 40 years ago today.

How about this Cold War moment frozen in time, when the M151 1/4-ton 4×4 utility truck, or MUTT, reigned supreme in the days before the adoption of the Hummer.

24 March 1986. Official period caption: “A member of Company A, 1st Battalion, 38th Infantry, 2nd Infantry Division, drives an M151 light utility vehicle across a bridge during the joint U.S. and South Korean Exercise Team Spirit ’86. The M151 is equipped with a tube-launched, optically tracked, wire-guided (TOW) anti-tank missile launcher.”

Scene Camera Operator: Sgt Jimmie T. Dugans Jr., Agency-Assigned Identifier: DASC8705427. National Archives Identifier: 6411295

You just have to love the carefully applied face camo, how bright the M81 woodland camo BDUs are, as well as the new-issued K-pot Kevlar helmet with skrim camo, and the old-school M16A1 in the backseat. Oh yeah, and the unbuckled web gear. A man has to have some creature comforts between evolutions.

Out of all the above, only the TOW survives, where it no doubt still sees service with the 2nd ID, which is still in Korea.

Argentine Cav Unit Marks 200th Anniversary

In news from south of the border, the Regimiento de Caballería de Tanques 1 (“Coronel Brandsen”) is marking its 200th anniversary this year.

RC Tan 1, today part of the 1.ª División’s II Brigada Blindada, was originally established on the 1st of February 1826, just as the Regimiento 1 de Caballería, and celebrates its regimental day every March 1st.

Formed as a hussar unit, its first regimental commander was a Paris-born Dutchman, Charles Louis Frédéric de Brandtzen, who is remembered as Carlos Luis Federico de Brandsen in Argentina.

Before emigrating to South America to fight the Spanish, Brandtzen/Brandsen served in Napoleon’s ministry of war, then picked up a junior officer’s commission in the Italian cavalry, served in Russia in 1812, and the German campaign in 1813, moved to a French regiment with a captain’s commission, and served through Waterloo, earning a Legion of Honor.

 “The Grande Armée Crossing the Berezina,” by Polish artist and army officer January Suchodolski (1866). Of the 50,000 members of the Army of the Kingdom of Italy that marched as part of Napoleon’s Grande Armee into Russia in 1812, just 2,500, Brandtzen included, survived the campaign. 

Losing his France privileges as a Bonapartist, he served in the Argentine Regimiento de Granaderos in the Chile campaign in 1817-19, then was commander of the Peruvian Legion of the Hussars of the Guard, eventually promoted to brigadier general in the Peruvian military.

He was a captain on the field at Nazca, Peru, on 15 October 1820, when a force of 250 Peruvian mounted grenadiers under Lt. Col. Manuel Rojas bested 700 fine Spanish cavalry under the command of the Marquis de Quimper.

Federico de Brandsen painted by Jean-Philippe Goulu

Brandtzen/Brandsen arrived back in Argentina just in time for the country’s war with Brazil and led the newly formed Regimiento 1 de Caballería, which now carries his name, and was killed in action at Ituzaingó in February 1827, dead at 41, and is remembered throughout Argentina as a hero.

Converted from horses to tanks only in 1968 (!) when they hung up their chargers for surplus M4 Shermans.

The Argentines used so-called “Repotenciado” (repowered) model Shermans, converted from British Firefly IC variants, as late as the mid-1980s. These carried a L/44 FTR 105 gun and a Ford V8.

Today RC Tan 1 operates the Tanque Argentino Mediano (TAM), a domestic 30-ton main battle tank (made with German help) that uses a 105mm gun and has been in service since the 1980s, and the 20mm Rh-202-armed TAM VCTP infantry fighting vehicle.

The regiment has five campaign streamers, including the cordón de Ituzaingó, earned with Colonel Brandsen at its head.

Spring 2026 Armor Magazine available online (free download)

The Spring 2026 issue of Armor magazine is now available for download. You can access your copy at the following link: https://www.dvidshub.net/publication/562/armor-magazine

In this issue, we are excited to include a “What Would You Do?” article. We present a tactical vignette from our editorial staff and invite you to write in and share how you would execute the mission. We look forward to reading your responses!

Hard copies will be available during the Sullivan Cup.  If you are in the Fort Benning area during Armor Week, be sure to pick up the latest issue.

Standing Departments

Chief of Armor’s Hatch: ATP 3-20.96, Cavalry Squadron, is Changing the Fight by BG Chad C. Chalfont

This article announces the upcoming publication of the new Army Techniques Publication (ATP) 3-20.96, Cavalry Squadron, and explains the significant evolution in U.S. Army cavalry doctrine. It details the shift from a doctrine focused on the cavalry’s functions to one centered on its purpose for the force it supports.

From the Gunner’s Seat: Forging the Future of Armor Leadership – Modernizing NCO PME by CSM Ryan W. Roush

This article announces a fundamental overhaul of the training and education for U.S. Army Armor non-commissioned officers (NCOs). The new approach aims to create more lethal and adaptive leaders by delivering shorter, more focused, and specialized Professional Military Education (PME).

From the Boresight Line: From Proficiency to Lethality – The Framework for Continuous Improvement in Armored Crews by SFC Chas D. Ward and SFC Kenneth L. Shelton

This article argues that to prevent stagnation in proficient armored crews, leaders must shift from training for qualification to training for combat by using advanced simulations, focusing after-action reviews on combat-relevant metrics, and implementing complex challenges. For new crews, the focus should be on providing stability and sufficient time to master foundational skills, ultimately creating a cycle of continuous improvement for the entire unit.

From the Combat Training Centers: Data Overload – Observations on Data and Mission Command From JMRC by LTC Jordan Bradford, MAJ Edwin den Harder, and COL CJ Kirkpatrick

This article discusses the paradox of “data overload” in modern military operations, where the sheer volume of information from numerous digital systems overwhelms commanders and staffs, impeding timely and effective decision-making. It analyzes the causes observed at the Joint Multinational Readiness Center (JMRC) and proposes concrete best practices for managing this data deluge.

From the Doctrine Corner: Winning the First Fight – Modernizing Armor and Cavalry Doctrine by MCOE Directorate of Collective Training and Doctrine (DCTD)

This article outlines the U.S. Army’s comprehensive effort to modernize its doctrine, focusing on providing practical tactics for currently available equipment. Key updates include reframing the cavalry squadron’s purpose, integrating sUAS and electronic warfare, and overhauling gunnery manuals to enhance lethality, all while soliciting feedback from soldiers to ensure relevance.

What Would You Do?

This article presents a tactical scenario from ARMOR magazine’s “What Would You Do?” column, challenging readers to devise a plan for an armor company to seize a chokepoint from a modern, drone-capable enemy. The task requires a 500-750 word response detailing an operational concept that integrates combined arms, electronic warfare, and unmanned systems.

Book Reviews: Brothers in Arms, One Legendary Tank Regiment’s Bloody War From D-Day to VE-Day, reviewed by RETIRED COL Chris R. Willis

Features

Data-Enabled Assessments: What Factors Correlate with Gunnery Excellence in ABCTs? by LTC Brian W. Bilfulco

This article uses statistical analysis to identify the key factors influencing the gunnery performance of tank and Bradley crews, moving beyond anecdotal evidence to provide data-driven insights for leaders. The study finds that individual crewmember attributes, prior experience, and unit-level support systems are significant predictors of success, allowing for more targeted and effective training.

Learning the Wrong Lessons: The Influence of Tanks in the Spanish Civil War on the U.S. Army by Maj Micheal Hanson

This article argues that the U.S. Army drew the wrong conclusions about tank employment from the Spanish Civil War, stunting its armored doctrine by favoring an infantry-support role. In contrast, the German Army correctly identified the need for powerful, massed tank formations, leaving the U.S. unprepared for the blitzkrieg tactics of World War II.

Creative Maintenance Solutions in a Fiscally Constrained Environment by MAJ Jordan L. Woodburn, 1LT Trevor N. Stanley, and 1LT James A. Puls

This article details how the 1-64 Armor Regiment used innovative, cost-effective maintenance solutions during a deployment, such as 3D printing replacement parts and leveraging the fabrication skills of allied forces. These methods allowed the unit to rapidly correct dead-lining faults, improve vehicle readiness, and save money in a fiscally constrained environment.

From Contact to Overmatch: Redefining Armor Fundamentals Through Transformation in Contact by COL Bryan Bonnema, MAJ Aram Hatfield, and MAJ David Strum

This article explains how the U.S. Army’s Armor branch is adapting its fundamental tactics to the modern battlefield of ubiquitous drones and sensors by introducing a new operational framework called Isolation–Exploitation–Regeneration (IER). The IER model prioritizes using unmanned systems for initial engagement, followed by a decisive strike with traditional armored forces, and a rapid reset for subsequent operations.

Steel Meets Sustainment; Key Takeaways from the 12-Day War by CPT Ben Kusinski

This article, written from the perspective of an Armor Officer, details the critical strategic and logistical lessons learned during a fictional 12-Day War in 2025. It emphasizes how sustainment operations are paramount to success in modern, large-scale combat operations against peer adversaries.

The Army’s New Maintenance Skills Test Program in the ABCT by CPT Gabriel Liranzo

This article advocates for the implementation of the Maintenance Skills Test (MST) program to standardize maintenance training at the operator level within Armor units, arguing that lessons from the Russo-Ukraine conflict and current manning challenges necessitate more self-sufficient crews. The author stresses that company commanders must prioritize the MST to foster a culture of ownership and enhance fleet readiness for large-scale combat operations.

Ukrainian Combat Employment of the Bradley Fighting Vehicle by 1LT Jack Lynch

This article argues that the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ tactical innovations with the Bradley Fighting Vehicle (BFV), which often diverge from U.S. doctrine by emphasizing decentralized, autonomous operations, offer valuable lessons for the U.S. Army. By examining how Ukraine uses the BFV for mobile fire support and ambushes, the author highlights the need for U.S. doctrine to prioritize adaptability and empower small-unit leaders.

A Rapidly Changing Operational Environment: Cavalry Scouts Need to Be Painfully Light and Disproportionately Lethal by SSG Matthew Watson

This article argues that the modern battlefield, characterized by pervasive drone surveillance and rapid sensor-to-shooter links, demands a radical reinvention of Cavalry Scout tactics. The author, a Staff Sergeant, contends that scout sections must become “painfully light” through extreme signature management and dispersion, while also being “disproportionately lethal” by integrating organic loitering munitions and networked fires to survive and remain effective.

Weasels in the snow

How about these great images from the German Army of a Waffenträger (weapons carrier) Wiesel 1 Aufklärung of the 1,700-man multinational battlegroup Panzerbrigade 45 (the “Lithuania Brigade”) frolicking in the snow, complete with MG3.

The Wiesel is one of the few modern tankettes in service today. Just 343 Wiesel 1s and 148 stretched Wiesel 2s have been delivered since 1979, and the 2.75 ton Audi 298-powered tracked vehicle just always looks like fun.

Activated in Vilnius on 1 April 2025, Panzerbrigade 45 currently includes the 122nd Armored Infantry Battalion (Panzergrenadierbataillon 122) from Oberviechtach and the 203rd Armored Battalion (Panzerbataillon 203) from Augustdorf and is set to grow to around 5,000 soldiers and civilian employees by 2027.

Nap Buddies

Happy National Napping Day!

GIs of the 69th Infantry Division take a well-deserved rest in a bed in Germany, March 1945. Judging from their boots, uniforms (heavy on the coveralls), and prevalence of M3 Grease Guns, they are likely tankers, perhaps of the 69th Cavalry Reconnaissance Troop (Mechanized) or the division’s two attached armored units: the 777th Tank Bn or 661st Tank Destroyer Bn.

L-R: Gerald A. Garrson, Donald Meyers, Stuart Brent, Bill McGough, and Alva Goodwin. Time LIFE Archives photo

The “Fighting 69th” was formed on 15 May 1943 at Camp Shelby and arrived in the ETO late in the war. It hit the front in February 1945 and spent 86 days in combat. Nonetheless, on its tear across the Rhineland and Central Europe, the division suffered 1,506 battle casualties. Notably, the Holocaust Museum denotes it as a Liberator Division, having liberated Leipzig-Thekla, a subcamp of Buchenwald, in April 1945.

After several months of occupation duty, they were sent back to the States and were deactivated in September 1945.

A great 100-page period pictorial history of the 69th is free to download online.

« Older Entries