Category Archives: US Navy

A-7 Plane Wreckage found after 37 Years

On a cold winter day in December of 1974, two A7-C jets collide at 15,000 feet offshore St. Augustine. One of the A7′s quickly becomes uncontrollable and falls out of the sky into the ocean below. The other aircraft is able to limp its way home.

Nearly 40 years later, the TISIRI team finds themselves investigating aircraft wreckage off the Coast of St. Augustine Florida. Scuba diving searches of one wreckage site has revealed what appears to be large aluminum metal structures and large tires. Structures that are often associated with military aircraft.

TISIRI divers have made several dives to the wreckage looking for clues to help lead to the identification of the aircraft. See pictures captured of the wreckage at TISIRI’s website here

USS Constitution sails at 215 years young…

USS Constitution is a wooden-hulled, three-masted heavy frigate of the United States Navy. Named by President George Washington after the Constitution of the United States of America, she is the world’s oldest commissioned naval vessel afloat. She was built in 1797, fought in the War of 1812,  and defeated five British warships: HMS Guerriere, Java, Pictou, Cyane and Levant. She continued to actively serve the nation as flagship in the Mediterranean and African squadrons, and circled the world in the 1840s. During the American Civil War she served as a training ship for the United States Naval Academy and carried artwork and industrial displays to the Paris Exposition of 1878. Retired from active service in 1881, she served as a receiving ship until designated a museum ship in 1907 and in 1934 she completed a three-year, 90-port tour of the nation.

In the past 134 years she has only sailed under her own power for her 200th birthday in 1997, and again in this month, to commemorate the 200th anniversary of her victory over Guerriere.

Here is what she looks like today at age 215:

 

Specs:
Type:     44-gun frigate
Tonnage:     1,576
Displacement:     2,200 tons
Length:     204 ft (62 m) billet head to taffrail;
175 ft (53 m) at waterline
Beam:     43 ft 6 in (13.26 m)
Height:     foremast: 198 ft (60 m)
mainmast: 220 ft (67 m)
mizzenmast:172.5 ft (52.6 m)
Draft:     21 ft (6.4 m) forward
23 ft (7.0 m) aft
Depth of hold:     14 ft 3 in (4.34 m)
Decks:     Orlop, Berth, Gun, Spar
Propulsion:     Sail (three masts, ship rig)
Sail plan:     42,710 sq ft (3,968 m2) on three masts
Speed:     13 knots (24 km/h; 15 mph)
Boats and landing
craft carried:     1 × 36 ft (11 m) longboat,
2 × 30 ft (9.1 m) cutters,
2 × 28 ft (8.5 m) whaleboats,
1 × 28 ft (8.5 m) gig,
1 × 22 ft (6.7 m) jolly boat,
1 × 14 ft (4.3 m) punt[2]
Complement:     450 including 55 Marines and 30 boys (1797)
Armament:     30 × 24-pounder (11 kg) long gun,
20 × 32-pounder (15 kg) carronade,
2 × 24-pounder (11 kg) bow chasers

(AP Photo)

The mission of the Constitution is to promote understanding of the Navy’s role in war and peace through active participation in public events and education through outreach programs, public access, and historic demonstration. Her crew of 60 officers and enlisted men participate in ceremonies, educational programs, and special events while keeping the ship open to visitors year-round and providing free tours. The crewmen are all active-duty members of the U.S. Navy, and the assignment is considered to be special duty in the Navy. The Constitution is the oldest commissioned vessel afloat in the world. Though she is not the oldest active-duty warship in the U.S. Navy. As of 2012, that ship is the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (CVN-65).

Former USN Officers Advise How They’d Contain China

A pair of retired US Navy Captains recently penned a very well written paper for the Naval War College (the full 7-page paper here ) entitled “Between Peace and the Air Sea Battle: A War at Sea in which they pain how the US could isolate a confrontation between itself and China and keep it bottled up West of Japan and PI.

Basically, isolate and blockade China with a force of submarines (much as the US Navy did in World War Two where Japan was cut off from the rest of the world by the War of the Maru’s inwhich a huge and effective US Submarine community sent eveything with a meatball on it to the bottom 1943-45) and small combantants for escort and sea denial (such as the US Navy did with the Blockade squadrons along the CSA coast during the Civil War from 1861-65)

To accomplish this the authors call for a fleet of small 64 FACs.

This is the Swedish Visby class FAC/corvette. At 600 tons it carries a 57mm gun, 8 surface to surface anti-ship missiles, a helicopter (or UAV) platform, and space and capability for ASW torpedo tubes, small CIWS, etc. This sounds just like what the Captains are talking about. 64 of these bad boys would make it very interesting in the South China Sea….if only the Navy would walk away from that pesky LCS program.

“What would the flotilla look like? In rough terms, we envision individual small
combatants of about six hundred tons carrying six or eight surface-to-surface
missiles and depending on soft kill and point defense for survival, aided by offboard manned or unmanned aerial vehicles for surveillance and tactical scouting…………..To paint a picture of possible structures, we contemplate as the smallest element a mutually supporting pair, a squadron to comprise eight vessels, and the entire force to be eight squadrons, of which half would be in East Asian waters. The units costing less than $100 million each, the entire force would require a very small part of the shipbuilding budget…..For comparison, a PHM (or patrol combatant hydrofoil, a type discarded by the U.S. Navy in 1993) carrying four Harpoons displaced 250 tons; coastal patrol ships (PCs) now operating in the Persian Gulf are of either three or four hundred tons; and the coastal minesweepers (MSCs) once stationed in Sasebo, on Kyushu, in Japan, displaced 450 tons…….. For example, supposing a unit cost of eighty million dollars in series production and assuming a mere ten-year service life, a force of sixty-four vessels would cost about $500 million per year to sustain, or a bit over 4 percent of the probably diminished Ship Construction (Navy), or SCN, budget.”

I love the idea personally, but the Navy has a history of dislike for FACs of any type.

The Russkis Were Chillin on the Gulf Coast….Bet you didnt know that

Did You see one of these poking around the Gulf Coast lately?

An Free Beacon article (found here ) recently advised that a Russian Navy Akula-class submarine was just in the Gulf of Mexico. No big deal. Its a big place. However, the Akula was there for a long time apparently (weeks not days) and (wait for it)….nobody but the Russians knew that it had even shown up.

You see back in the 1980s and 90s we had a SOSSUS net that tracked everything in the Atlantic, keepiing an eye on every Soviet boat. We had SSN’s off Murmansk watching for when they left and came back. We had a line of sonobouys, P-3 Orions, Nimrods, and frigates watching the GIUK gap.

That’s all gone now. The Navy and NATO doesn’t have to worry about all that these days.

Background on the Akula-class:

Project 971 ????-? (Shchuka-B, ‘Shchuka’ meaning pike, NATO reporting name “Akula“), is a nuclear-powered attack submarine (SSN) first deployed by the Soviet Navy in 1986. There are four sub-classes or flights of Shchuka, totaling some 15 submarines built between 1984 and 2001. The Russians still maintain 9 of them while India is playing with a single boat.

The 13,800-ton (submerged), 370-foot long Akula is a very large attack submarine. For reference that is about the size of a WWII heavy cruiser or a 1900-era battleship. They are twice the size of the US 1970s era Sturgeon SSN class submarines. They carry upto 40-torpedoes in eight tubes, 4 × 533mm torpedo tubes (28 torpedoes) and 4 × 650mm torpedo tubes (12 torpedoes). With advanced sonars and a high speed they can speed at over 35-knots, remain submerged until they run out of groceries (about 100 days) and dive  to over 1800-feet deep.

They are killers. Akula means shark. With 40 advanced torps even one of these boats could (if things ever went bad) cause a panic in the Gulf, close down the Panama Canal, the mouth of the Mississippi River, strike at vulnerable LNG or Oil platforms, sink newly built LHA, LPD, DDG and NSCs on sea trials from Huntington Ingalls in Pascagoula, trail US SSBNs leaving Kings Bay, or lie in wait for a nice big carrier calling at Mayport, or Jacksonville.

Of course, I am just paranoid.

None of that would ever happen, right?

By the way, Hugo Chavez wants an Akula of his own..(Link here)

And the US Navy just commissioned the newest Virgina class SSN in……Pascagoula…

The Cossacks Are Coming, Aren’t They?

The misinterpreted Russian Navy mission in the U.S. Civil War may have accidentally helped the North win the conflict.

In 1863, it looked as if the mighty British Empire may intervene in the US Civil War on the side of the Confederate States (CSA). War fever had come to London early in the conflict after the “Trent Affair” placed the Her Majesty’s Navy and Army on alert. British firms such as Enfield and Whitworth sold tremendous amounts of arms of all kinds to Confederate agents and these were in turn often smuggled through the US Naval quarantine via British blockade-runners. Confederate raiders including the notorious CSS Alabama and CSS Shenandoah were constructed in English harbors. British war tourist Colonel (later General Sir) Arthur Fremantle in 1863 had just returned from three months among both the US and Confederate commands fighting the war and loudly pronounced that the Confederates would certainly be victorious.

Relations with the Tsar and the Union

Relations between the United States and Tsarist Russia were warmer than with many other European nations at the time. Cassius Marcellus Clay, a well-known abolitionist, was the US Ambassador to the court of Tsar Alexander II during the conflict. It was Clay’s report on the Tsar’s Emancipation of 23,000,000 Russian Serfs in 1861 helped pave the way for Lincolns own Emancipation Proclamation of the 4,000,000 American Negro slaves the next year. American engineers and railway organizers were helpful in starting the early Russian railway system. Clay openly encouraged a military alliance with between the US and Britain, France, and possibly Spain openly thought of Russia as a hedge between what as a possible intervention on the Confederate side.

Cassius Clay…..the original one not the boxer

The Russians Arrive

Suddenly, on September 24, 1863, two separate Russian naval squadrons arrived in US waters unannounced on both the East and West coasts. The Russian Atlantic fleet on the US East Coast had sailed from the Baltic and arrived at New York under command of Rear Admiral Lesovskii with three large frigates and three smaller vessels. The fleet included the new and fearsome 5,100-ton US-built screw frigate Alexander Nevsky with 51 sixty-pounder naval guns. The Russian Pacific fleet that arrived on the West Coast in San Francisco was under command of Rear Admiral Popov and consisted of four small gunboats and a pair of armed merchants cruisers. The ships were saluted and allowed entry as being on a friendly port call.

The 5100-ton frigate Alexander Nevsky was one of the finest ships of any navy in the Atlantic. This is a portrait of her in New York Harbor in 1863 that was in Harper’s Weekly.

The crew of the Russian frigate Osliaba harbored in Alexandria, Virginia, 1863.

The American media and political machine immediately interpreted the reason for these naval visits as clear Russian support for the US cause. The real reason, however, seems to be something quite different. Poland, largely occupied by Russia, was in open revolt in the summer of 1863. The so-called Polish Crisis followed in which there was a possibility that Britain and or France would intervene on the side of the insurgent Poles. The Tsar, fearing that his isolated Pacific and Atlantic naval squadrons would be seized or destroyed by superior British or French units in the event of war, sent them into the neutral US ports to seek refuge. This fact was held from the Americans and the fleet’s Russian officers simply stated that they were in US ports for ‘not unfriendly purposes”

The respective admirals of the Russian squadrons had sealed orders to place themselves at the disposal of the US government in the event of a joint British or French intervention on both Russia and the United States. In the event of Russia entering into war with the Anglo-French forces alone then the Russian ships were to sortie against the commercial fleets of those vessels as best as they could and then seek internment.

Rear Admiral Lesovskii, now that’s an impressive figure. How could the Union NOT think the appearance of this guy in Washington meant that Russia was on their side?

The Outcome of the Visit

Several historians claim that the British government saw this mysterious visit by the Russians in US waters as an open confirmation of a secret military pact between the two future superpowers. This interpretation further helped deter foreign recognition of the Confederate cause and resulted in the extinguishing of the South’s flame of hope. It can also be claimed that it stalled British intervention in the Tsar’s problems in Poland with the thought that it could result in a US invasion of Canada.

When the Polish Uprising crisis abated in April 1864, the Russian fleets were recalled quietly to their respective home waters. The dozen Tsarist warships had conducted port calls and training cruises in the US and neighboring waters for almost seven months during the war while managing to avoid the conflict altogether. In the late fall of 1863 with rumors of Confederate raiders lurking on the West Coast, Admiral Popov confirmed to the governor of California that he and his fleet would indeed protect the coast of their defacto ally if the raiders did actually appear. The effect of this ‘fleet-in-being’ resulted directly in an increase in US-Russian relations.

The US Navy, on the cutting edge of ironclad steam warship design, passed along plans and expertise to their Russian colleagues who had no such vessels. By 1865, the Tsar had a fleet of ten ultra modern 200-foot long ironclad battleships based on the monitor USS Passaic. These ships, known to the Russians as the Uragan (Bronenosetz) class were completed even with two US-designed 15-inch smoothbore Dahlgren guns and far outgunned any other European navy of the time.

Ten of these Uragan class monitors were built in the US for Russia after the Civil War and were the backbone of the modern Tsarist Navy for decades.

In 1867, Russian Ambassador Baron Stoeckel advised US Secretary Seward that the Russian government would entertain bids for the failing colony of Alaska, which was rapidly accepted. Cassius Clay, still in Russia helped to conduct the negations from inside the Winter Palace. The Russians even rapidly transferred control of the territory, which was seen by many to be worthless nearly a year before Congress ratified the transfer and in effect, couldn’t give it back.

This odd incident of the Russian fleets; visit may have prevented what would have certainly been one of the planet’s first and possibly oddest of world wars. The real reasons for the Russian fleet’s visit were only uncovered and publicized nearly fifty years later in 1915 by military historian Frank Golder.

By that time the Uragan class monitors were long scrapped (except for one), Alaska was a US territory and Russia was finally at war with Britain and France- this time as allies against Germany and Austria in World War One.

On the West Coast, there is also a more lingering reminder.

While in San Francisco, a number of crewmen from the Bogatyr, Popov’s flagship, fought a raging multi-block fire in the city’s burgeoning Finacial District and six lost their lives. Buried in the military cemetery at Mare Island Naval Shipyard, in 2010 the Russian Consulate replaced their U.S. Navy headstones from the 19th Century with (unauthorized) new ones at a cost of $20,000.

What Keeps the PLAN (*Chinese Navy) up at night

Ships and submarines participating in Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise 2012 sail in formation in the waters around the Hawaiian islands. Twenty-two nations, more than 40 ships and submarines, more than 200 aircraft and 25,000 personnel are participating in the biennial Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise from June 29 to Aug. 3, in and around the Hawaiian Islands. The world’s largest international maritime exercise, RIMPAC provides a unique training opportunity that helps participants foster and sustain the cooperative relationships that are critical to ensuring the safety of sea lanes and security on the world’s oceans. RIMPAC 2012 is the 23rd exercise in the series that began in 1971. (U.S. Navy photo by Chief Mass Communication Specialist Keith Devinney/RELEASED)

The T-Hawk Flying Roomba

When i was a kid i was in love with the movie 1979 The Black Hole ( I was five, thank you). It was an otherwise forgettable sci-fi flick that featured a pair of what today would be classified as Self-Aware AI-outfitted UAVs named V.I.N.CENT and B.O.B. ( Roddy McDowall and Slim Pickens did the voices for them!):

In 1979, these were total fantasy……and I was hooked

Now Honeywell has made a dead ringer: the T-Hawk

The T- Hawk is a pretty Groovy little thing that is of course a much less intelligent RC/ROV- UAV that the Army, Navy and UK are using. Four of these guys sniffed out the melted nuke plant at Fukisihima. So who knows, maybe Black Holes are in their future.

The T-Hawk is powered by a 3W-56 56cc Boxer Twin piston, two stroke gas-powered engine. Each engine produces an output of 4hp. It can fly at speeds of up to 46 miles an hour (mph) at wind speeds of about 17mph. The MAV can reach altitudes of up to 10,000ft and has an endurance of about 46 minutes. Its flight routes can be pre-programmed or controlled manually.

……Now, its routine….coming soon to an EOD/UXO team near you….

The US Army awarded a $61m contract to Honeywell in May 2006 to develop an advanced version of the drone with a heavy fuel engine and long endurance. The US Navy ordered 20 gasoline engine MAVs (GMAV) for deployment with the US Multi-Service Explosive Ordnance Disposal Group in Iraq. The $7.5m worth contract was awarded in 2007. Another order for 372 more MAVs was placed in January 2008.

The US Navy designated the T-Hawk MAVs as the RQ-16A T-Hawk. The navy received the first MAV in August 2009. Six T-Hawk MAVs were ordered by the UK Ministry of Defense in February 2009. The Miami-Dade Police Department has also purchased two of the T-Hawk drones

More here at ArmyTechnology.com

Warship Wednesday August 8

Here at LSOZI, we are going to take out every Wednesday for a look at the old steampunk navies of the 1866-1938 time period and will profile a different ship each week.

– Christopher Eger

Warship Wednesday,  Aug 8

Here we have the monitor USS Puritan dropping it like its hot shelling the port of Matanzas on the 27th April 1898.

She was laid down ostensibly in 1864 during the Civil War and never completed. However with a smile and a wink naval engineers started a ‘Great Repair’ of this old hulk using all new materials, even on a new graving dock starting in 1874, and just 22 years and a major keel-up redesign later, in 1896 the brand new USS Puritan (BM-1) came down the ways, only 32-years in the making.

By 1896 monitors were passe, kind of like a cop carrying a revolver these days. They still worked if used correctly, but were just dangerously obsolete. Nevertheless, Puritan served admirably (*against rather obsolete Spanish Ships) in the Spanish American War of 1898. Assigned to the Cuban blockade in April, she joined New York and Cincinnati in shelling Matanzas on the 27th. After a stop at Key West in early May, she departed on the 20th to join the force building under Rear Admiral William T. Sampson that would eventually move against Santiago. Puritan linked up on the 22nd and Sampson moved his ships to Key Frances on the Nicholas Channel in order to execute his plan to contain the Spanish Fleet at Santiago. The success of Sampson’s squadron at Santiago on July 3 resulted in almost the complete destruction of the Spanish Fleet. After Cuba, she sailed for Puerto Rico where she landed a party of US Marines and shelled the Spanish positions at the Battle of Fajardo.

After the war she was soon decommissioned again and spent most of the next twenty years at the disposal of various Naval Militias (the precursor of the Navy Reserve) for training dockside before finally being stricken in 1918. With the hulk of the old USS Plunger aboard (see last week’s Warship Wednesday) she was sold four years later, having served in one form or another in the US Navy for 58 years, only about 9 of them on active duty.

Specs:

Type:     Puritan class Monitor
Displacement:     6,060 long tons (6,157 t)
Length:     296 ft 3 in (90.30 m)
Beam:     60 ft 1.5 in (18.326 m)
Draft:     18 ft (5.5 m)
Depth of hold:     5 ft 7 in (1.70 m)
Propulsion:     Steam engine
Speed:     12.4 knots (23.0 km/h; 14.3 mph)
Complement:     200
Armament:     • 4 × 12 in (300 mm) breechloader rifles
• 6 × 4 in (100 mm) breechloader rifles
• unknown × 6-pounder guns
Armor:     Depth: 5 ft 7 in (1.70 m)
Amidships: 14 in (360 mm)
Barbettes: 14 in (360 mm)
Turrets: 8 in (200 mm)
Deck: 2 in (51 mm)

Sometime after 1898 and before 1909…Not a bad looking ship….for a monitor

Trawlers with a Surprise

Saw pictures of this floating around out there and decided to bring it up. For as long as thier has been trawlers, Navies have pressed them into service. In both World Wars, some of the best and most effective erstaz ASW boats were fishing boats that the navy would throw some depth charges and old ‘good enough’ popguns on deck.

Norwegian fishing schooner taken up by the German Navy in 1940 for use as a patrol boat. Note the machine gun on the front of the bow. These craft have often been used during war.

However these the boats below were purpose built by the Soviet Navy to look like Naval trawlers (they are painted haze gray and have pennant numbers in most cases) but are sometimes very un-trawler like under the surface.

Between 1960-1988 the Soviet Union built some 37 project 1824/1823 NATO code name “Muna” class modified trawlers.

More than 20 were simply used as seagoing armement transports in the thousands of craggy rocky inlets along the Baltic (due to thier 10-foot draft), one was completes as a Seagoing reefer transports, a few were small signals intelligence ships, four were completed for the KGB as border patrol ships, some did survey work, and this one, coded OS-57  offically ‘supported torpedo research’. It leads to wonder why a trawler would have a set of two underwater torpedo tubes along with an active sonar. It would appear that as mant as four of these torpedo carriers were produced. With two different sized tubes, one on each side.

My grandma, what big teeth you have under your bow….

Displacement (tons):
Standard:     441-455
Full load:     686-912 depending on type
Dimensions (m):
Length:     51,45m (178 feet)
Beam:     8,42m (27 feet)
Draft:     3,22m (10.52 feet)
Speed (kts):     11,5
Range:     4950 nm (9,3 kts), 2240 nm (11,4 kts) (Project 1824B – 8600 nm (9 kts), 6000

nm (11 kts))
Autonomy (days):     15 (Project 1824B – 16)
Propulsion:     1×600 h.p., diesel 6LH-30.50-3 (Project 1824B – 1×800 h.p., diesel), 2

diesel-generators x50 kW
Armament:
1×2 25 mm 2M-3M – Reya cannons
1×1 650 mm torpedo tube – (torpedo trials ships only)
1×1 533 mm torpedo tube – (torpedo trials ships only)
2×4 launchers MTU-4 SAM – Project 1824B

A pair of tubes and an active forward looking sonar, just what every fisherman needs.

Electronics:     Navigation radar “Don”
Capacity (tons):     180
Crew:     22 (Project 1824B – 30, Project 18236 – 23)

Just When you thought it was safe to go back in the Water

The Washington Times reports that:

“A leading Chinese fishing-industry official is urging the Chinese government to provide arms and military training for 100,000 Chinese fishermen to roam the South China Sea and defeat Vietnam and other countries in the region that are challenging China’s sweeping claims of sovereignty in those waters.”

Littoral combat/Asymmetric Warfare anyone?

« Older Entries Recent Entries »