Farewell, HMAS Anzac (for now)

With her replacement– the planned first general-purpose frigate– still at least six years down the road, the Royal Australian Navy decommissioned the lead ship of its license-built Blohm & Voss MEKO 200 design, HMAS Anzac (FFH 150), completing 28 years of service on 18 May.

Ten 4,000-ton Anzac-class frigates (eight Australian, two for the Royal New Zealand Navy) were built by Tenix Defence Systems (now BAE Systems) at the company’s Williamstown yard in Melbourne between 1993 and 2006.

HMAS Anzac operating in the Persian Gulf region in 2002, one of her three extensive tours to the region. Note her original layout

Subsequent Phase 2A/2B and 4B upgrades saw her SPS-49 radar replaced with a distinctive CEAFAR phased-array radar mast which gave the ”First Lady of the Fleet” a very peculiar appearance.

HMAS Anzac returns to Fleet Base West in September 2023 after her final deployment. Note her phased array retrofit mast

She was the third such ship to carry the name of the famed Australian and New Zealand Army Corps in the RAN, after a Great War-era Parker-class destroyer leader that served under the Australian flag in the 1920s and a Battle-class destroyer that served in the 1950s and 60s.

For sure, the name will return.

Wreck of ‘Hit em Harder’ confirmed

One of the 52 WWII American submarines considered on Eternal Patrol, the resting place of the Gato-class fleet boat USS Harder (SS 257), which received six battle stars for her wartime service, has been confirmed.

Laid down at EB in Groton a week before the attack on Pearl Harbor, Harder was commissioned on 2 December 1942 and earned the Presidential Unit Citation through five wildly successful wartime patrols.

The recently commissioned Harder (SS-257) steaming on the surface of Narragansett Bay, 20 January 1943.

Harder, accompanied by sisters Hake (SS-256) and Haddo (SS-255) departed Fremantle on 5 August 1944 for her sixth war patrol, assigned to haunt the South China Sea off Luzon. Two weeks later the American wolf pack splashed four Japanese cargo ships while Harder and Haddo attacked and destroyed the escort ships Matsuwa and Hiburi on 22 August.

By 24 August, with the out-of-torpedo Haddo returned to base, Harder and Hake had one final joint engagement, one that Harder would not survive.

As noted by DANFS:

Before dawn on 24 August 1944, Hake sighted the escort ship CD-22 and Patrol Boat No. 102 (ex-Stewart, DD-224.)  As Hake closed to attack, the patrol boat turned away toward Dasol Bay. Hake broke off her approach, turned northward, sighting Harder’s periscope 600 to 700 yards dead ahead. Swinging southward, Hake sighted CD-22 about 2,000 yards off her port quarter. To escape, Hake went deep and rigged for silent running. At 0728 Hake’s crew reported hearing 15 rapid depth charges explode in the distance astern. Hake continued evasive action, returning to the attack area shortly after noon to sweep the area at periscope depth – only finding a ring of marker buoys covering a radius of one-half mile. Japanese records later revealed that Harder fired three torpedoes at CD-22 in a “down-the-throat” shot, which the enemy vessel successfully evaded. At 0728, she launched the first of several depth charges, which sunk the American submarine.  

The Navy declared Harder presumed lost on 2 January 1945. Her name was stricken from the Navy Register on 20 January.

She is in remarkable condition after sitting on the floor for almost 80 years, sitting upright under the crush of more than 3,000 meters of sea.

4D photogrammetry model of USS Harder (SS 257) wreck site by The Lost 52. The Lost 52 Project scanned the entire boat and stitched all the images together in a multi-dimensional model used to study and explore the site. Tim Taylor and The Lost 52 Project grants the US Navy permission to use their image for press release of the discovery of the USS Harder with photo credit given to Tim Taylor and the Lost 52 Project.

And so we remember Harder and her 80 souls. 
 
There are no roses on sailors’ graves,
Nor wreaths upon the storm-tossed waves,
No last post from the King’s band,
So far away from their native land,
No heartbroken words carved on stone,
Just shipmates’ bodies there alone,
The only tributes are the seagulls sweep,
And the teardrop when a loved one weeps.
 

(Photo: Chris Eger)

Remember to remember today

Official caption: “Memorial Day services held at Asan Cemetery, Guam, Mariana Islands. Note a Marine standing vigilantly over the graves of his fallen comrades.”

Photographed by Photographer’s Mate Second Class William Susoeff. NARA 80-G-330028

Mossberg Plinking

80 years ago today, Rosyth, Scotland, 25 May 1944: “Leading WREN Bertha Brokliss, of London and WREN Mary Baptiste, of St Annes-on-Sea, Lancashire, being instructed in firing .22 rifles by Chief Gunnery Instructor J Jones, of Irvine, Ayrshire.”

Photo by LT EA Zimmerman, IWM Collection A 23655

Same as above IWM A 23654

The very curious rifles are Mossberg 42M-Bs, of which the British Government ordered some 46,000 between June 1941 (when the U.S. was the “Great Neutral”) and March 1943.

Mossberg 42M-B

Equipped in British service with Parker Hale PH 16 D rear sights, they served in basic marksmanship roles– and some were even passed on to the Home Army Auxillary units and SOE teams with a Parker-Hale small-bore moderator (suppressor) attached, because, why bloody not?

Calling Mr. Roscoe

One interesting new (well, rebooted) gun design that I am looking forward to testing this summer is the Heritage Roscoe.

A salute to the old-school pocket revolvers from the days of Mike Hammer and Philip Marlowe, the cigar-box-worthy .38SPL +P Roscoe looks right out of the mid-20th Century, clad in a deep glossy finish, classic round butt wood grips, fixed sights, and a 5-shot cylinder. Plus, it is available in both 2- and 3-inch models.

Best yet, it has an ask of $350, which should translate to $299-ish at retail.

Heritage, the Taurus subsidiary best known for its affordable single-action rimfire pistols and carbines, has launched the Roscoe line. This comes almost a decade after Taurus sunset its popular Model 85 5-shot small-frame revolver line– upgrading it to the larger 6-shot Model 856– and recalls the company’s history during the old Bangor Punta days (1962-72ish) when it was a sister to S&W and they shared tech.

More in my column at Guns.com.

Confusing Frigate Developments

Thursday’s contracts included an order for two more Constellation class frigates. Emphasis mine:

Marinette Marine Corp., Marinette, Wisconsin, is awarded a $1,044,529,113 fixed-price incentive (firm-target) modification to previously awarded contract (N00024-20-C-2300) to exercise options for detail design and construction of two Constellation-class guided-missile frigates, FFG 66 and FFG 67. Work will be performed in Marinette, Wisconsin (51%); Camden, New Jersey (17%); Chicago, Illinois (7%); Green Bay, Wisconsin (4%); Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (3%); Hauppauge, New York (3%); Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin (3%); Cincinnati, Ohio (3%); Kaukauna, Wisconsin (2%); Charlotte, North Carolina (2%); Bethesda, Maryland (2%); Millersville, Maryland (2%); and Atlanta, Georgia (1%), and is expected to be completed by April 2030. Fiscal 2024 shipbuilding and conversion (Navy) funds in the amount of $1,044,529,113 will be obligated at time of award and will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. Naval Sea Systems Command, Washington, D.C., is the contracting activity.

So far, we have the USS Constellation (FFG 62), USS Congress (FFG 63), USS Chesapeake (FFG 64), and USS Lafayette (FFG 65), all echoing traditional early Navy names.

This comes as our beloved SECNAV (here comes the Navy ship naming convention soapbox) announced that the future FFG 66 will be named…USS Hamilton.

Now don’t get me wrong, there have been a couple of Hamiltons on the Navy List in the past, both named for the Madison’s SECNAV that served during the first part of the War of 1812: the current Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Paul Hamilton (DDG 60) and the Wickes-class destroyer/fast minesweeper USS Hamilton (DD-141/DMS-18/AG-111) that served from 1919 through 1945.

USS Paul Hamilton DDG-60

However, this will not be for Paul Hamilton, but instead for Alexander Hamilton, the Army artillerist who was the first Secretary of the Navy and the guy generally seen as the father of today’s Coast Guard.

The reason this hoses me off is because of the Coast Guard’s long history with the name including a brand-new National Security class cutter USCGC Hamilton (WMSL-753) that was commissioned in 2014, the Vietnam/Cold War era 378-foot class leader USCGC Hamilton (WHEC-715) that served from 1967 to 2011, the Treasury class 327-foot cutter (WPG-34) which was sunk by a U-boat in WWII, as well as circa 1921, 1871, and 1830 cutters that carried the name.

BLACK SEA (April 30, 2021) U.S. Coast Guard members conduct boat and flight procedures on the USCGC Hamilton (WMSL 753) with Turkish naval members aboard the TCG Turgutreis (F 241) in the Black Sea, April 30, 2021

USCGC Hamilton (WHEC-715)

USCGC Alexander Hamilton (WPG-34) departs Boston for a Neutrality Patrol off the Grand Banks in November of 1939

The Hamilton at sea, 1978 painting at USCG Museum

Once the future USS Hamilton (FFG 66) joins the fleet, it will cause tactical confusion in the respect that there is already a San Diego-based destroyer USS Paul Hamilton (DDG 60), and the frigate-sized USCGC Hamilton (WMSL-753).

Surely, there is no shortage of traditional early U.S. Navy names that can be recycled without both ripping off the Coast Guard and causing confusion down the line. Perhaps there could be an 11th USS Ranger, ninth USS Hornet or USS Dolphin, eighth USS Lexington, seventh USS Shark, sixth USS Franklin, USS Ticonderoga, USS Hancock, or USS Concord, or fourth USS Valley Forge? Just saying.

Or, how about this: the USS Benjamin Stoddert, after the first SECNAV? Only two ships have carried it in the past– DD-302 and DDG-22– and it has been missing from the Navy List since 1991?

But then again, ole Ben Stoddart doesn’t have a hit Broadway musical to his credit.

Just a ciggy break and a Schmeisser

80 Years Ago today. 24 May 1944. Here we see an S&W Victory .38 revolver-armed and cigarette-equipped LT W. Smith, along with platoon Sergeant F.G. White, armed with a captured German MP40 SMG– often incorrectly dubbed a “Schmeisser”– of the Royal Canadian Regiment (RCR), taking a breather in Pontecorvo, Italy. The two are clad in denim cotton battledress.

Note the good sergeant also has a Mills bomb at the ready while the fact that both men have field glasses count point to them being members of a recon element. The Canadian troops had entered the Liri Valley city that morning, after the breakthrough of the Hitler Line, and found it completely in ruins.

Canadian Army Photo by LT C.E. Nye, who has some 275 images digitized in the Library and Archives Canada. The above is MIKAN 3202714, PA-144722

Pontecorvo May 24, 1944, Canadian troops enter the ruins of the city after hard fighting. (Canadian Army Overseas Photo)

With a lineage that goes back to the War of 1812 and the Fenian Raids but a name that was only bestowed in 1902 after service in the Boer Wars, the RCR was bled white at the Somme, Arras, Vimy Ridge, and Passchendaele during the Grear War.

At the outbreak of WWII, the RCR was deployed as part of the 1st Canadian Division, garrisoned England for four years, then finally hit the beach in Sicily (Operation Husky) followed by the amphibious action at Reggio di Calabria on the Italian mainland. The RCR fought up the Italian boot, including key battles around the Moro River valley near Ortona in December 1943, and the battles on the Hitler and Gothic lines in 1944.

Sent in February 1945 to join the First Canadian Army in Northwest Europe for Operation Goldflake, they ended the war in Holland, where they inherited lots more German hardware. 

Privates J.A. Taylor and J.D. Villeneuve of the Royal Canadian Regiment stacking rifles turned in by surrendering German soldiers, IJmuiden, Netherlands, 11 May 1945. LAC 3211669

A common theme that would follow them to Korea in 1951. 

Soldiers of the 2nd Battalion, the Royal Canadian Regiment, with assorted captured DP-28 and PPS 43s in Korea.

The Royal Canadian Regiment has been awarded a total of 61 battle honours since 1812, including 27 for its WWII service.

Comprising three active and one reserve battalion today, their headquarters is at Garrison Petawawa in Ontario.

 

Warship Wednesday (on a Thursday) May 23, 2024: Taking One’s Place for Overlord

Here at LSOZI, we take off every Wednesday for a look at the old steam/diesel navies of the 1833-1954 period and will profile a different ship each week. These ships have a life, a tale all their own, which sometimes takes them to the strangest places.- Christopher EgerWarship Wednesday (on a Thursday) May 23, 2024: Taking One’s Place for Overlord

Warship Wednesday (on a Thursday) May 23, 2024: Taking One’s Place for Overlord

Naval History and Heritage Command photo NH 60867

Above we see Royal Navy’s D (Danae)-class light cruiser HMS Durban (D 99) at Honolulu harbor, 22 May 1928, with a good view– captured by a U.S. Navy photographer– of one of her four sets of triple 21-inch torpedo tube mounts trained out, with a pair of torpedoes visible in lower tubes! She was on her way to Bermuda to take up a position on the West Indies Station after spending six years in Hong Kong, the hard life of a British cruiser in the 1920s, you see.

Designed for the Great War, Durban missed her dance but made it to the next one– although she never saw the end.

“The Ds”

A heavier and more seaworthy (not to mention better armed) follow-up to the Royal Navy’s five sprawling classes of “C” type light cruisers, the Admiralty wanted a full dozen more advanced “D” class units and began ordering them in 1916 under the Emergency War Program, with class leader HMS Danae.

British C-class cruisers HMS Cairo and Calcutta, seen in October 1927 at Boston’s Charleston Navy Yard. The D class cruisers were basically these ships, lengthened some 20 feet, and given better armament. Leslie Jones Collection BPL

Some 4,850 tons (pushing 6,000 later) they were rakish ships, with a 472-foot overall length and a perfect 1:10 ratio beam of 47 feet to match. Powered by a half dozen Yarrow boilers pushing a pair of geared steam turbines– which the British had really figured out by this point in time– they were planned to make 29 knots. However, on trials, some bested this.

They also had limited aircraft facilities. 

Danae class cruiser HMS Diomede and a Fairey IIIF Seaplane, March 1933. While able to support seaplanes, they could not carry them. The aviation platform installed on these cruisers was a simple flying-off pad for light, wheeled STO aircraft, such as the Sopwith Pup. Image AAE 0096

Armament was a main battery of a half dozen 6″/45 BL Mark XIIs in single shielded mounts– good guns that could fire a 112-pound HE shell to 23,770 yards at a rate of as many as seven shells per minute with a well-rehearsed crew. These were arranged in a straight line down the center of the ship with each able to fire broadside but only two able to fire ahead and two astern.

HMS Danae by Dr Dan Saranga via Blueprintscom

A pair of QF 3-inch 20 cwt L/45 Mk. I AA guns– meant more for counter zeppelin use than planes– four 3-pounders, as well as a couple of Lewis guns, rounded out the armament with her brace of 12 torpedo tubes in four triple mounts, enabling six torpedoes in a broadside, closing us out.

The Danae class cruisers HMS Dragon, Danae, and Despatch off Bermuda, 1931.

Meet Durban

Our subject, the second RN warship named for a then-colonial South African city, was laid down at Scotts Shipbuilding and Engineering Company, Greenock, in January 1918, at a time when the German High Seas Fleet had been bottled up for more than a year. The Kaiser threw in the towel and his fleet was soon littering the floor of Scapa Flow, which slowed down Durban’s construction.

Durban in the stocks via Two centuries of shipbuilding by the Scotts at Greenock, National Library of Scotland

HMS Durban was only completed by the Devonport Dockyard in November 1921 and joined the fleet, one of only eight cruisers to carry a Mark III* Dreyer Table and one of only 10 to carry the new 12-foot U.B.3 Combined Height and Rangefinder as part of her fire control system.

Durban was one of the lucky ones. Of the dozen classmates ordered, four– Daedalus, Daring, Desperate, and Dryad— were all canceled. Meanwhile, only four– Danae, Dauntless, Dragon, and Delhi— actually saw a few weeks of wartime service.

With the London Naval Treaty limiting the RNs cruiser tonnage, two of the class, Diomede and Dunedin, were loaned promptly to the nascent Royal New Zealand Navy from 1924—25 until 1937 when such treaty limits were cast aside.

In truth, it was surprising that Durban never saw service during the same period with a South African Navy, although she did call on her namesake city at least once. This was likely because the circa 1920s and 30s South African Naval Service was cash-strapped in the extreme and, while they operated the old 4,000-ton Mersey-class cruiser HMS Thames (as SATS General Botha) it was as a dockside training hulk, with her guns and boilers removed and the former engine and boiler rooms converted into a gym!

Happy Interbellum Cruises

Durban’s first detail was to the 5th Light Cruiser Squadron on China Station, where she arrived in early 1922 before transferring six years later to the West Indies Station.

HMS Durban seen in Durban in December 1926 (City of Durban Archives)

Her time in China included sending ashore various naval landing parties in Nanking and Shanghai during periods of unrest.

Via the Gordon Smith collection, Naval-History.net, taken by Chief Yeoman of Signals George Smith, DSM, Royal Navy 1904-28:

Signalmen near one of Durban’s 6 inch guns in 1927 Shaghai. Via the Gordon Smith collection, Naval-History.net,

HMS Durban, likely China station. Note her extensive awnings. Via the Gordon Smith collection, Naval-History.net,

HMS Durban in China 1927, the Gordon Smith collection, Naval-History.net,

Durban Naval landing party on the forecastle (not known if Shanghai or Nanking) 1927. the Gordon Smith collection, Naval-History.net,

Durban Naval Landing Party Inspection 1927. the Gordon Smith collection, Naval-History.net,

Durban Naval Landing Party Attack 1927 the Gordon Smith collection, Naval-History.net,

Durban Resurrection Bay Alaska 1928, the Gordon Smith collection, Naval-History.net,

While on Atlantic service, she made at least one call at Boston and was photographed by Boston Globe photographer Leslie Jones.

HMS Durban in Navy Yard July 14 1930. Leslie Jones via Commonwealth

Visitors on board HMS Durban Navy Yard July 14, 1930.Leslie Jones via BPL

She returned home after service with the South Atlantic Division for an extensive overhaul that added a new style of advanced range finders. Also added were more AAA guns: a total of three 4-inch (in place of the older two 3″L/45s) 2-pounder pom-poms, two Vickers machine guns, and eight Lewis guns.

The entry for the D class in Jane’s circa 1931.

Re-commissioned at Portsmouth on 6 March 1934 for service with the Third Cruiser Squadron in the Mediterranean, Durban was sent to the Med for two years.

Open-source naval journals carried the news of this cyclic movement of HMs cruiser force, with Durban often appearing in the pages of such volumes, with ONI dutifully cataloging each piece of news.

“Cruiser returning home. HMS Durban, which is to be relieved by H.M.S. Exeter on the American and West Indies Station.” note the ONI stamp. NH 60999

Eighth Cruiser Squadron – HMS Durban, which has come home to undergo an extensive refit at Chatham, and is being replaced by the Danae on the American and West Indies Station. Photo: Abrahams & Sons, Devenport. NH 60800

“Fifth Light Cruiser Squadron. HMS Durban which is to be recommissioned for further service on the China Station.” Photo: Abrahams & Sons, Devenport. NH 60998

The U.S. ONI kept extensive files on foreign warships, which included the best photographs that could be taken during port calls or whenever a vessel passed through the Panama Canal. Several of the D-class got close enough to be immortalized in the ONI collection– for instance, sister HMS Delhi when she called at Long Beach in 1932.

Durban had her visit from a Navy shutterbug on 22 May 1928 while in Honolulu, as this series will show:

Returning to the Home Isles in September 1936, she was in ordinary when the Germans marched into Poland three years later. Plans were afoot to refit the class with a battery of newer 4.5-inch guns instead of their old-style 6-inchers, but that was shelved as there simply weren’t enough funds.

War!

Assigned to the 9th Cruiser Squadron, Durban was reactivated and dispatched to perform convoy defense in the South Atlantic between Freetown and the Cape.

Soon transferred to her old 5th Squadron beat on China Station, she arrived in Singapore by Halloween 1939 and sailed for Hong Kong soon after. Deployed for trade defense and patrol, her primary duty going into 1940 was to keep tabs on German shipping plying the Dutch East Indies ports and then, later, join in the chase of the Hilfskreuzer Atlantis (HSK 2), aka “Raider C.”

Had Durban encountered Atlantis (which carried six 6-inch guns and four torpedo tubes) it could have been a fight similar to that of the German merchant raider Kormoran and Australian light cruiser HMAS Sydney, who clashed in a mutually destructive battle in the Pacific in 1941. Still, there is no doubt that both ships would have given it their best. 

NH 60997

This sort of campaigning in the backwater of the war, at least until December 1941, continued including riding shotgun on the occasional Bombay to Singapore convoy (BM 005, BM 004/2, BM 009, etc).

Meanwhile, the war on the other side of the world was less kind, with sister Dunedin torpedoed and sunk by U-124 off Saint Paul’s Rock in the South Atlantic, on 24 November 1941.

When the Japanese decided to go manic, all the obsolete Durban could do was help pick up the pieces. She escorted the troopships taking the survivors of the lost HMS Repulse and HMS Prince of Wales to Colombo and in January 1942 evacuated Royal Navy staff from Singapore to Batavia in the Dutch East Indies.

While escorting troop and evac convoys between Singapore and the Dutch Indies in February 1942, she came under a Japanese air attack north of the Sunda Strait which left her forward 6-inch gun out of service. Eight ratings were killed and several were wounded.

Ordered to put into Freemantle the next week, she was sent on the slow route via the Indian Ocean to the Brooklyn Navy Yard for repairs– dropping off Admiral Thomas C. Hart, former commander of the doomed U.S. Asiatic Fleet, at Colombo.

On her way to the U.S, Durban came across the German minelayer Doggerbank (Schiff 53) (5154 GRT, built 1929, former British Speybank) as she was sowing a minefield off Capetown, a task that Durban came close to, but not close enough, to stopping, on the evening of 13 March 1942.

As detailed here:

Operation Kopenhagen comprised the laying of a minefield near Capetown, where many shipping lanes converged. Ships from Australia and New Zealand arrived here to make the final leg to Britain, while important troop convoys passed through the area en route to the Middle East. Doggerbank, unlike a normal minelayer, wasn’t equipped with mine rails on a lower deck, which meant that all mines had to be hoisted to the main deck. For operation “Kopenhagen”, 75 of them were prepared, disguised as deckcargo. Schneidewind decided to start the operation during the nighttime hours of March 12. Carefully, the Doggerbank approached the target area on the 12th. Things almost went wrong when in the late afternoon, an aircraft was sighted. It hailed the ship, asking for its name and destination. Schneidewind [her skipper] ordered to signal “Levernbank from New York via Recife to Capetown”, waved a few times with his hat and then left the bridge. His resolute performance worked and the aircraft was apparently satisfied with the answer. Later that evening, a small ship was sighted, which was easily evaded. Sixty mines were laid in the early morning of the 13th.

Schneidewind decided to retreat through the normal shipping lanes around Cape Good Hope to avoid suspicion. The idea was to lay more mines near Cape Agulhas for operation “Kairo”. Around 1945 that evening, a warship appeared on the horizon, flashing signals with a red light. Schneidewind himself thought it was a Birmingham-class cruiser, but it was in fact the older HMS Durban, en route to Simonstown for repairs. The signal the cruiser flashed was the standard “NNJ” signal, ordering to hoist the secret letters for identification. Naturally, the Germans didn’t know this signal and simply didn’t send a reply. After coming closer, the Durban asked “What ship”, to which Schneidewind replied, “Levernbank from New York to Durban, good night”. Again, his bold answer worked, as the Durban steamed on and disappeared in the dark.

Durban arrived in New York on 9 April 1942 for a period of repair that would last two months, she would emerge for a week of full power trials and gunnery exercises off Hampton Roads before leaving for Portsmouth Dockyard, where she would arrive at the end of June.

She would also pick up radar– a Type 286 air warning– but, uncommon for her class, retain her torpedo tubes, a feature she would only share with sister Despatch, as the rest of the “D” class cruisers had landed theirs. Likewise, she would have 8 20 mm Oerlikon singles installed in place of the old 2-pounder pom-pom guns. A puny counter-aircraft fit, but better than what she had anyway. To offset this extra topside weight, she lost her aircraft handling capability and landed one of her 6-inchers.

HMS Durban (D99) October 1942, Portsmouth. Note her fresh camo scheme. IWM A 22986

HMS Durban (D 99) Underway in the Solent. Note her wartime camouflage and her five remaining main guns turned to port. IWM FL 8998

Further refits and workups would see her emerge and join a “Winston Special” Convoy (WS 23) in October, sailing from Scotland via the Cape of Good Hope to Egypt and, later, India, ultimately arriving in Bombay in December.

Durban would continue to serve in the Indian Ocean on trade defense, undertaking several additional convoys, until ordered back to Portsmouth in October 1943.

Somewhat hopelessly obsolete by this point in the war– her sisters — she was reduced to a skeleton crew and laid up, with dockyard personnel instructed to remove her armament, sensors, and virtually anything else of value so long as she could still make steam and revolutions.

She had one more run to make.

Normandy

Durban was tapped, along with several older warships, to become part of the Gooseberry breakwater that would shelter the Mulberry Port off the beach at Normandy, allowing the rapid landing of large cargo to move ashore in the days after successful Overlord landings in June 1944.

HMS Durban (D99) stripped off Normandy on 7 June 1944, RCN photo

On D+3, 9 June 1944, Durban was scuttled to form part of Gooseberry 5 off Ouistreham in the Seine Bay, with gunners stationed on the grounded ships helping defend the enterprise.

Arial view of the Mulberry Harbour Port Winston off Arromanches, Normandy

June 1944. A Gooseberry, a line of block ships laid off the beaches at Ouistreham to form a reef before the rest of the Mulberry Port was assembled. The Gooseberry includes the old HMS Durban and the Dutch cruiser Sumatra. Two DUKWs can be seen moving amongst the block ships. Note: Goosberry 5 at Sword beach. Photo by LT Claude Henry Parnall IWM A24055

A Gooseberry, a line of block ships laid off the beaches to form a reef before the rest of the Mulberry was assembled. The Gooseberry includes the old HMS Durban and the Dutch cruiser Sumatra. Photo by LT Claude Henry Parnall A24054

Notably, Durban would soon be joined in the Gooseberry by sister Dragon, which had been operated by the Free Polish Navy since January 1943 but had been damaged off Caen by a German human torpedo on 8 July. Ironically, Durban would herself be hit by another fish launched from a Marder on 3 August while already reefed, after surviving a fierce three-day storm.

Nonetheless, the harbor worked.

By D+5, with the artificial harbor in place, 10,000 tons of cargo a day would be unloaded, a rate that would increase to 20,000 tons per day by D+20, keeping pace through the end of August.

Epilogue

Today, what is left of Durban remains in 36 feet of water off Ouistreham.

Few artifacts remain ashore of the cruiser, notably her ship’s bell, which has long been housed at the chapel in the Old Fort in Durban.

Her 1942 repair records from the Brooklyn Navy Yard are in the National Archives.

As for Durban’s sisters, the five still afloat after VJ-Day were soon paid off, and all were quickly sold for scrap, with the last, Delhi, leaving for the breakers in 1948.

The Royal Navy never reused the name “Durban” but the South African Navy did, ordering the SAS Durban (M 1499), one of several Ton class mine sweepers built in the UK during the 1950s specifically for the SAN.

She was preserved as a museum in her namesake city from 1991 through 2022.


Ships are more than steel
and wood
And heart of burning coal,
For those who sail upon
them know
That some ships have a
soul.


If you liked this column, please consider joining the International Naval Research Organization (INRO), Publishers of Warship International

They are possibly one of the best sources of naval study, images, and fellowship you can find. http://www.warship.org/membership.htm

The International Naval Research Organization is a non-profit corporation dedicated to the encouragement of the study of naval vessels and their histories, principally in the era of iron and steel warships (about 1860 to date). Its purpose is to provide information and a means of contact for those interested in warships.

With more than 50 years of scholarship, Warship International, the written tome of the INRO has published hundreds of articles, most of which are unique in their sweep and subject.

PRINT still has its place. If you LOVE warships you should belong.

I’m a member, so should you be!

Final Indy class LCS Christened

The 19th Independence-variant Littoral Combat Ship– the future USS Pierre (LCS 38)-– was christened over the weekend at Austal in Mobile.

Ship sponsor Larissa Thune Hargens executed the ceremonial bottle break over the bow of Pierre, witnessed by an audience of over four hundred guests. (Austal)

At least the end is near on the shitshow that has been the LCS program.

Granted, while the Indy class vessels have been less flawed than the 16-ship Freedom class built by Lockheed Martin (Marinette Marine), that is a low bar.

Anywho, it seems the Indies have at least matured to the point that they may be a viable minehunter that can carry a few anti-ship missiles and perform some low-risk flag-waving and surveillance tasks. After all, the Navy’s first Mine Countermeasures Mission Package (MCM MP) just arrived aboard Indy class sister USS Canberra (LCS 30) late last month and four of the class will deploy to the Middle East in 2025 in the MCM role. 
 

An unmanned surface vehicle is craned aboard the Independence-variant littoral combat ship USS Canberra (LCS 30), as a part of the first embarkation of the Mine Countermeasures (MCM) mission package, on April 23. The MCM mission package is an integrated suite of unmanned maritime systems and sensors that locates, identifies, and destroys mines in the littorals while increasing the ship’s standoff distance from the threat area. Littoral Combat Ships are fast, optimally manned, mission-tailored surface combatants that operate in near-shore and open-ocean environments, winning against 21st-century coastal threats. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Vance Hand)

As detailed by NAVSEA:

An integrated suite of unmanned maritime systems and sensors, the MCM mission package locates, identifies, and destroys mines in the littorals while increasing the ship’s standoff distance from the threat area. Embarked with the MCM mission package, an LCS or a vessel of opportunity can conduct the full spectrum of detect-to-engage operations (hunt, neutralize, and sweep) against mine threats using sensors and weapons deployed from the MCM Unmanned Surface Vehicle (USV), an MH-60S multi-mission helicopter and associated support equipment.

The MCM mission package achieved Initial Operational Capability (IOC) on March 31, 2023, following rigorous initial operational testing and evaluation (IOT&E) of the full mission package, including the AN/AQS-20 system, during the fall of 2022 aboard [Independent class sister] USS Cincinnati (LCS 20). With the deployment of the first MCM mission packages in Fiscal Year 2025, the Navy will commence divesting from aging MH-53 helicopters and Avenger Class MCM ships.

Further, as noted by Austal:

In November 2023 the Navy reported it had six Independence-variant LCS deployed in the Pacific throughout 2023, including the record-breaking 26-month overseas deployment of USS Charleston (LCS 18). The Austal USA-built LCS variant is also providing support to the Navy’s unmanned programs with USS Oakland (LCS 24) operating as a mothership for the Unmanned Surface Division 1 vessels Ranger, Mariner, Seahawk, and Sea Hunter; the large flight decks support unmanned drones, like the MQ-8C Fire Scout.

For the record, the christening ceremony for the future USS Pierre, which is the second U.S. Navy warship to carry the name after a WWII subchaser (PC-1141):

And the sizzle reel from Austal on the class thus far:

Those keeping up at home will note that, of the 55 planned LCS variants back in 2004, we currently have 8 Freedoms on semi-active duty, 5 decommissioned, and three (Nantucket, Beloit, and Cleveland) still building while of the Indies: 15 are active, one (Kingsville) has been delivered but not yet commissioned, two early flight ships have been decommissioned, and one (Pierre) is building. That gives us 23-24 with the fleet (of which a third are in limited roles and the Navy is seriously trying to ditch them), four under construction, and 7 on red lead row.

Pierre will, when commissioned, head to San Diego to join the rest of her class in service. 

Looking back to 2004, the Navy should have just ordered 30 updated VLS-equipped OHP FFG7s and a dozen Italian-built MCMs from an off-the-shelf design for all the good it did, but that’s hindsight I guess.

The Glong gets a (much-needed) Update

One of the models that has been around since almost the beginning, the first Glock 17L, or “Glong” pistols – so named because they have an extended 6-inch barrel and corresponding 8.9-inch slide rather than the standard model’s 4.5/7.3-inch barrel/slide – was introduced as a first-generation gun back in 1988.

Moving up to Gen 2 in 1990 and Gen 3 in 1998, the pistol has been stuck in a world where Boyz II Men and Chumbawamba were still in the Top 40, largely replaced by the similar but more practical/tactical G34.

Well, that is until last week, when the G17L leaped over the Gen 4 standard and went right to Gen 5, complete with a Glock MOS optics plate cut at the 2024 NRA Annual Meetings in Dallas.

Yup, it’s back.

Other updates include the new-style Glock Marksman Barrel (GMB), a better trigger, and the deletion of the oft-detested finger grooves on the grip, replaced by the company’s more modular grip frame that accommodates a series of interchangeable backstraps.

More in my column at Guns.com.

« Older Entries Recent Entries »