Category Archives: USMC

A Great Idea, Perhaps Horribly Implemented

As you may have heard, President Trump and Finnish Prime Minister Keir Starmer had a 45-minute public post-NATO joining hug fest at the White House on Thursday. A big result, of importance to us, is an announcement that a wild consortium of folks who should know how to make icebreakers has been selected for the $9 billion design and construction of six Arctic Security Cutters (ASC) for the USCG to a basically existing design.

Eighty percent of the world’s icebreakers are designed in Finland, and 60 percent of them are built there.

The group is made up of Bollinger Shipyards, in partnership with Finland’s Rauma Marine Constructions (Rauma) and Aker Arctic Technology Inc. (Aker Arctic), along with Canada’s Seaspan Shipyards (Seaspan).

At first glance, this should be a good thing as Bollinger has been aces when it comes to making Dutch Damen-designed patrol boats in their Louisiana yards for the USCG going back to the 1980s, including the 110-foot Islands, the 87-foot Marine Protector, and the 158-foot Sentinel classes. In fact, Bollinger has delivered 186 vessels to the Coast Guard– that work– in the past 40 years. However, their three planned 23,000-ton USCG Polar Security Cutter heavy polar icebreakers, inherited when they bought Halter in Mississippi, have been plagued with issues.

Rauma delivered three well-made and successful 10,000-ton multi-purpose icebreakers in the 1990s to Arctia Oy, the state-owned company responsible for operating the Finnish icebreaker fleet. This was followed by the 24,000 icebreaking passenger ferry Aurora Botnia in 2021. Further, they have four Pohjanmaa-class multi-purpose frigates currently under construction for the Finnish Navy that are to be capable of operating in ice.

Aker is a Finnish firm that has spent the past 20 years designing icebreakers to the most modern standards.

Vancouver-based Seaspan has been around since 1970 and has produced dozens of commercial tugs and ferries, and as of late has pulled down several RCN/CCG contracts, including for the 20,000-ton Protecteur class AOEs (based on a successful design used by the German Navy) and the 26,000-ton icebreaker CCGS Arpatuuq. Both of the latter contracts have suffered from considerable delays. Speaking of delays, Seaspan just started sea trials on the ice-capable oceanographic ship CCGS Naalak Nappaaluk whose budget jumped more than tenfold from CAD$109 million to CAD$1.47 billion (not a misprint), has dragged out way past the expected delivery date, and has been under construction for the past 10 years.

The Seaspan-built CCGS Naalak Nappaaluk was ordered in 2015 and only recently began sea trials, at 10X the original budget.

Seaspan has also pulled down the Canadian Coast Guard contract for up to 16 Aker-designed 8,987-ton, 327-foot multi-purpose icebreakers (MPI), which are intended to revitalize the CCG’s fleet. Capable of icebreaking (polar class 4), SAR, sovereignty patrols, fishery patrol, and ATON, the project is estimated to cost $14.2 billion, but the first vessel isn’t to be delivered until 2030.

The Seaspan MPIs for the CCG have a large forward crane and cargo hold with excess deck capacity, a helicopter hangar, two utility craft, and the capability to operate RHIBs. Capable of 16 knots with a diesel-electric suite that allows for a 12,000nm/60-day endurance, they only need a 50-person crew.

The CCG MPIs:

What the USCG is supposed to be getting…

So, the agreement this week is for six Arctic Security Cutters, based on the Seaspan-Aker MPI design for the CCG. The first three vessels will be built simultaneously by Rauma in Finland and Bollinger in the U.S. (likely at the old Halter yard in Mississippi), with production of the remaining three vessels to be built in the U.S., while Seaspan and Aker will assist.

Delivery of the first three vessels is expected within 36 months of the contract award. That means they are expected before the first Canadian-built MPI, which they are based on, will be delivered. Now that is putting a lot of faith in Rauma and Bollinger.

The difference between the CCG MPI and the images of the planned Bollinger-Rauma ASC seems few, with the large crane deleted, an MK 38 Mod 2/3 gun forward, four M2 .50 cals on the bridge wings, and an MH-60T on the helicopter deck.

Keep in mind the forward cargo deck is to be left open to allow for eight 40-foot ISO cargo containers, which could host the Mk 70 Mod 1 Payload Delivery System– the Typhon SMRF— which holds four strike-length VLS launchers on an internal erector. While the ASC doesn’t have the radars and fire control to push a SM-6 (unlessed linked to a DDG/CG), she could theoretically carry a mix of up to 32 vertical launch ASROC (cued by MH60 LAMPS), TLAMs, or anti-ship Tomahawks in such launchers.

That’s interesting.

Of course, I would like a 57mm Mk 110 (or even a 5-incher) forward, and at least a CIWS or Sea-Ram aft, in addition to the Mk 70 possibilities, but that’s just me.

I hope it all works out.

Warship Comings and Goings

The past week has been a very busy one when it comes to new warships coming online and old ones getting the (sometimes hard) goodbye.

Comings

The future Flight III Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Ted Stevens (DDG 128), equipped with the new-to-the-fleet AN/SPY-6 (V)1 radar and Aegis Baseline 10 Combat System, recently completed her builder’s sea trials. 

Stevens will be commissioned in Alaska in May or June 2026 as she honors the former senator from that state.

Ingalls delivered the first Flight III, USS Jack H. Lucas (DDG 125), in June 2023 and has five others under construction. In all seriousness, these should probably be re-classified as Lucas-class cruisers (CG) as they are stepping into the AAW boss role in carrier battle groups left vacant by the retirement of the Ticonderogas.

Speaking of Flight III Burkes, the future USS Louis H. Wilson Jr (DDG 126) was christened on Bath Iron Works’ drydock over the weekend.

She was sponsored and christened by the daughter of Mississippi-born General Louis H. Wilson Jr., USMC, who served as the Twenty-Sixth Commandant of the Marine Corps during its immediate post-Vietnam rebuilding process. Wilson was no slouch when it came to valor, having earned a MoH while leading a rifle company of the Ninth Marines on Guam in 1944 at the ripe old age of 24.

When it comes to another storied WWII vet, the 82-year-old Gato-class fleet boat USS Cobia (SS-245) is looking great after a dry docking at Fincantieri shipyard. Among other things, she has blasted, primed, and coated with 1,945 gallons of paint, and her sea chests have been cleared of mussels and blanked off with metal plates. A leak was also found in main ballast tank 2, which was drained, cleaned, and repaired.

Her $1.5 million refresh is scheduled to take six weeks and keep her ship-shape for another 25 years, after which she will go back on display at the Wisconsin Maritime Museum in Manitowoc around mid-October.

Cobia was last dry-docked in the fall of 1996, which tracks.

Goings

The Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruiser USS Philippine Sea (CG 58) was officially decommissioned during a ceremony onboard Naval Station Norfolk on Sept. 25, 2025. Commissioned in 1989, she has given 36 years of hard service and is the second U.S. Navy warship to carry the name.

Now, only seven of the 27 Ticos are still in active service, with another 15, all decommissioned since 2022, nominally in the Reserve Fleet. Five earlier non-VLS Ticos have all been disposed of.

Finally, the retired Norwegian Olso-class (modified Dealy class DEs) frigate KNM Bergen (F301) was disposed of in a sinkex off the coast of her homeland last month.

There is some confusion over whether she was sunk by a torpedo from the Ula-class submarine KNM Uthaug (S 304) or a Quickstrike delivered by a visiting USAF B-2. As some of the photos released by the Norwegian Navy are clearly taken via periscope, it may be a combination of the two.

It is known that a visiting B-2A “Spirit of Indiana” (82-1069), accompanied by a Royal Norwegian Air Force F-35A Lightning II and P-8A Poseidon aircraft, did use a 2,000-pound class GBU-31 JDAM (Quicksink variant) against “a maritime target” off Andøya in the Norwegian Sea, on 3 September, so this may have been against ex-Bergen.

Either way, it was a dramatic end to the 2,000-ton frigate, which served faithfully on the front lines of the Cold War from 1967 to 2005.

Advancing to new finds

With the expansion inland from the Inchon beaches and the breakout from the Pusan Perimeter in late September 1950, the North Korean People’s Army was broken.

Kim Il Sung’s ruined regiments, after three months of non-stop fighting and thousands of sorties from Allied airpower, had been reduced from 220,000 troops to around 70,000 effectives, and were outnumbered by UN ground forces by more than 2:1 by this point in the war, with the latter growing stronger every day.

Members of the 5th Marine Regt. are welcomed by a greeting party of South Koreans as they move to the front lines near the Han River to engage in action against the North Korean forces, in an offensive launched by U.S. troops in that area. 18 September 1950. Photographer: Sgt. Herbert Nutter. SC 348694

Cpl. Ulysess J. Breaux of Breaux Bridge, La.; Cpl. Roy L. Guice of Rioneer, La.; and Pvt. David L. Cordova of Los Angeles, Calif., zeroed in their .30 caliber water-cooled machine gun on the line 23 miles southwest of Inchon, Korea. 19 September 1950. Photographer: Cpl. Alex Klein. SC 348698

ROK Marines move toward the Han River from the Kimpo air strip aboard DUKWs of the 1st Marine Div., in an offensive launched by UN forces against the North Korean enemy forces in that area. 20 September 1950. SC 348704

The 24th Infantry Division of the Eighth Army enters Taejon on 28 September 1950, returning to the scene of their earlier battles. National Archives Identifier 348337951

The next two months saw a steady advance while the North Koreans retreated, with Seoul liberated on 26 September and the ROK Army crossing the 38th Parallel into their northern neighbor’s territory on 1 October, with British and American forces following a week later.

What they encountered was the remnants of a smashed Communist fighting force, and often vehicles never seen up close by Western eyes of the era, outside of May Day parades.

While the North Korean force had invaded as an armored fist with a spearhead of 150 Soviet-made T-34-85s, it left the South largely on foot.

The captured equipment was a boon to Western intelligence, which, familiar with the T-34-76 from 1945 link-ups in the ETO and captured German intelligence files, was eager to examine some newer models and how they fared against NATO weapon systems.

A Soviet-built T-34/85 tank was knocked out during the Battle of Taejon, and later recovered by the same unit, a testament to the stand of Maj. Gen. William F. Dean, commanding the U.S. 24th Infantry Division.

Result of a napalm bomb on an enemy T-34 tank guarding the main road to Waegwan, Korea. 20 September 1950. Photographer: Cpl. George J. Myers. SC 348914

Men of the 5th RCT pose on a Russian-made SU-76 (self-propelled gun) with the back section of the turret blown off, captured from North Koreans in the Waegwan area, Korea. 20 September 1950. Photographer: Cpl. George J. Myers. SC 348915

T-34 tank destroyed by 5th Marines on the road to Kimpo Airfield, 17 September 1950. From the Oliver P. Smith Collection (COLL/213), Marine Corps Archives & Special Collections

A wrecked T-34 tank on a collapsed bridge span somewhere near Suwon or Osan, September 1950

Soviet-built T-34-85 tank captured by the U.S. Army’s 27th Infantry Regiment “Wolfhounds” (25th ID) from North Korean forces, September 1950.

Further, the advancing troops came across the “ghost bridges” used by the Norks to create nearly bomb-proof submerged crossings over rivers, which were thrown up after UN airstrikes and retreating U.S. engineers had dropped the peacetime bridges. A classic Soviet Red Army technique, especially when operating in an area with questionable air superiority, the tactic still worked.

They were almost impossible to spot from the air when not in active use and harder to knock out.

2.5-ton trucks cross a river by an underwater bridge, eight miles northwest of Taegu, Korea, on their way to the front line during the Korean War, September 16, 1950. Underwater bridges are a useful way of avoiding being spotted from the air.

M-26 tanks of the 6th Tank Bn.., 24th Inf. Div. crossing the Kumho River on an underwater crossing, consisting of rocks and sandbags reinforcing the riverbed as the 24th Inf. Div. advances against the North Korean forces along the Naktong River. 18 September 1950. Photographer: Pfc. Lonnie Butler SC 348668

M-26 tanks of the 6th Tank Bn.., 24th Inf. Div. crossing the Kumho River on an underwater crossing, consisting of rocks and sandbags reinforcing the riverbed as the 24th Inf. Div. advances against the North Korean forces along the Naktong River. 18 September 1950. Photographer: Pfc. Lonnie Butler SC 348669

The advance would continue, with the U.S. Eighth Army moving up the east coast of the Korean peninsula from Pusan while the Marines and the 7th Infantry would leapfrog up the west coast, the two forces bisected by the 300-mile-long Taebaek Mountain range, into which many of the remaining North Korean formations withdrew.

By 18 October, ROK forces captured Hamnung and Hugnam, while the North Korean capital of Pyongyang was captured by Eighth Army on the 19th.

However, by 25 October, with some forward elements in sight of the Yalu River, the lines solidified and, in a few days, the “Victory” and “Home by Christmas” talk would be dashed as the conflict became an entirely different war.

Looks like the ACV is really happening

How about this photo series recently posted by the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, showing operational Marine Amphibious Combat Vehicles (ACVs) at play from a big ‘phib.

An amphibious combat vehicle with Battalion Landing Team 3/5, 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit, launches from amphibious assault ship USS Boxer (LHD 4) in the Pacific Ocean, Sept. 14, 2025. Elements of the 11th MEU embarked Boxer to conduct integrated training off the coast of Camp Pendleton, California. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Joseph Helms)

A U.S. Marine Corps amphibious combat vehicle with Battalion Landing Team 3/5, 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit, conducts an open-water transit prior to embarking the amphibious assault ship USS Boxer (LHD 4) in the Pacific Ocean, Sept. 14, 2025. Elements of the 11th MEU embarked Boxer to conduct integrated training off the coast of Camp Pendleton, California. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Joseph Helms)

U.S. Marine Corps amphibious combat vehicles with Battalion Landing Team 3/5, 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit, prepare to embark the amphibious assault ship USS Boxer (LHD 4) in the Pacific Ocean, Sept. 14, 2025. Elements of the 11th MEU embarked Boxer to conduct integrated training off the coast of Camp Pendleton, California. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Joseph Helms)

Based on the Italian Iveco SuperAV 8×8, the BAE-produced ACV is the replacement for the troubled and long-serving (circa 1972) AAVP-7A1, the last of the Marine Corps amtracs.

These guys:

The legacy AAVP7.. AAV7A1 assault amphibious vehicles transport Marines with 2d Assault Amphibian Battalion and 1st Battalion, 2d Marine Regiment, both with 2d Marine Division, for a wet-gap amphibious crossing as part of a company-sized infiltration on Camp Lejeune, N.C., Aug. 10, 2021. The infiltration focused on maneuvering across complex terrain and picket lines with near-peer capabilities in an unscripted force-on-force scenario. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. Jacqueline C. Arre)

Whereas the 29 ton AAVP-7A1 was a giant (26 foot long, 11 tall and wide) bread box that was clad in 45mm of armor and was good for 45mph on surfaced roads and 7 knots in the water, the even heavier (32 ton) and larger (30 feet by 10 by 10) ACV can carry about half the personnel (13 Marine passengers vs 21) but can at least do it faster, with a published speed of 65mph on paved roads and 6 knots on the water.

The Corps announced the delivery of the 300th ACV at its BAE production facility in York, Pennsylvania, earlier this month. That’s about half of the way to the finish line of 623 vehicles, based on the latest program of record, to equip its three active and one reserve Assault Amphibian Battalions.

Pig Safari

Some 40 years ago this month, September 1985: “A Marine aboard the battleship USS Iowa (BB 61), armed with an M60 machine gun, participate in a self-defense force test during Exercise Ocean Safari ’85.”

Note the stern 16″/50 triple gun turret in the foggy Atlantic background and the battleship’s new Douglas fir deck which replaced her WWII-era teak. PH1 Jeff Hilton. 330-CFD-DN-ST-86-02496

Note the Woodland M81 pattern camo, and new PASGT kevlar frag vest (but not a K-pot, still rocking the WWII-era M1 steel helmet). The M60 appears to be a Vietnam standard “Pig” model. Around this time the Corps was replacing these heavy guns with the pared-down M60E3 which shaved a few pounds and, post-Desert Storm, would ultimately move (slowly) to the FN Mag 58 M240G variant in the 1990s.

As for Marine Dets on battleships and carriers, they went the way of the M60 in 1998.

For reference, the MarDet on Iowa in 1942 was 110 men, and by 1985 had shrunk to just 58.

Their jobs in the 1980s were primarily to man the ship’s eight M2 .50 cal mounts as well as the 27-member crew for Mount 55– their dedicated 5″/38 Mk 28 twin turret– spearhead the ship’s reaction force, as well as provide a guard for the skipper and admiral (if aboard) and protect any “special weapons” that may or may not have ever been carried by the battleships. 

USCG Ups 154-foot Cutter Buy to 77 Hulls, PSU Boat Raiders, and HITRON Marks 1,000 ‘kills’

The Coast Guard’s 2004 Program of Record for its planned Sentinel-class Fast Response Cutter (FRC) program was “24 to 36 hulls.”

That was then.

Envisioned to replace 49 aging 110-foot 1980-90s vintage Island class patrol cutters (WPBs), 12 of which had been ruined in a botched lengthening modification, the new ships would be 30 percent longer, at 154-feet, and nearly twice the tonnage.

110-foot Island class cutters compared to the new 154-foot Sentinel (Webber) class FRCs

Powered by two 5,800 shp MTU diesels (double the plant of the 110s), the FRCs also had 50 percent greater unrefueled range (2,900nm vs 1,882nm), a much better cutter boat (a stern dock launched jet drive 26-footer vs a davit deployed 18-footer with an outboard), better habitability, sensors, commo, and better guns (a gyro-stabilized remote fired Mk 38 Mod 2/3 25mm with an EO/IR sensor system and 4-6 M2s/Mk19s vs an unstabilized eyeball-trained Mk 38 Mod 0 and two M2s).

Plus, they had larger crews, at 4 officers, 4 POs, and 16 ratings, vs 2/2/12, which meant more hands could be sent away on landing details.

This meant they would be rated as WPCs instead of WPBs, akin to the Navy’s similar 170-foot Cyclone-class PCs.

MIAMI — The Coast Guard Cutter Webber, the Coast Guard’s first Sentinel Class patrol boat, arrives at Coast Guard Sector Miami Feb. 9, 2012. The 154-foot Webber is a Fast Response Cutter capable of independently deploying to conduct missions such as ports, waterways, and coastal security, fishery patrols, drug and illegal migrant law enforcement, search and rescue, and national defense along the Gulf of Mexico and throughout the Caribbean. U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Sabrina Elgammal.

The lead FRC delivered, USCGC Bernard C. Webber (WPC-1101), commissioned in April 2012, while the last 110s to leave Coast Guard service did so this summer, at which point the FRCs, which have proven extremely handy, even on long-ranging blue water cruises in the Pacific, had 58 hulls in service with another nine under contract.

A big jump from 24-36!

The truth is, the USCG is pressing these new 154-footers into the gap left by their aging 210-270-foot blue-water medium-endurance cutter fleet. Mission whackamole.

Classmember USCGC Oliver Berry (WPC-1124) completed a nearly 9,300-nautical-mile, 45-day round-trip patrol from Hawaii to Guam in 2020 and followed it up with a 46-day patrol in 2024. At the same time, several of these hulls are self-deploying 7,700 miles from Key West to new home ports in Alaska.

There have been repeated calls for the Navy to purchase members of the class for use in littoral operations, as the cutter has sufficient weight and space to mount a Naval Strike Missile box launcher with four tubes at the stern.

Now, the CG has upped the $65 million per-cutter Sentinel class program to 77 hulls, with a 10-ship buy announced this week.

“Since its introduction to the fleet in 2012 as the successor to the 110-foot Island class patrol boat, the Fast Response Cutter has consistently proven its capabilities, adaptability, and effectiveness in a wide range of maritime environments and Coast Guard missions,” said RADM Mike Campbell, the Coast Guard’s Director of Systems Integration and Chief Acquisition Officer.

PSU Boat Raiders!

As part of Arctic Edge 2025, an element of 3rd Bn, 4th Marines, 1st MARDIV teamed up with Long Beach, California-based USCGR Port Security Unit 311 to use their 32-foot Transportable Port Security Boats to conduct a boat raid on a “simulated enemy port” at Port Mackenzie, Alaska.

A sort of budget SWCC/SEAL kind of arrangement.

The SWCC we have at home, if you will.

U.S. Coast Guardsmen with Port Security Unit 311, and U.S. Marines with Kilo Company, 3rd Battalion, 4th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division, depart after conducting an amphibious raid on a simulated enemy port during ARCTIC EDGE 2025 (AE25) at Port Mackenzie, Alaska, Aug. 13, 2025. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Earik Barton)

U.S. Coast Guardsmen with Port Security Unit 311, and U.S. Marines with Kilo Company, 3rd Battalion, 4th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division, conduct an amphibious raid on a simulated enemy port during ARCTIC EDGE 2025 (AE25) at Port Mackenzie, Alaska, Aug. 13, 2025. The raid was conducted to demonstrate joint-service interoperability in an austere environment. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Earik Barton)

U.S. Coast Guardsmen with Port Security Unit 311, and U.S. Marines with Kilo Company, 3rd Battalion, 4th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division, conduct an amphibious raid on a simulated enemy port during ARCTIC EDGE 2025 (AE25) at Port Mackenzie, Alaska, Aug. 13, 2025. The raid was conducted to demonstrate joint-service interoperability in an austere environment. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Earik Barton)

U.S. Coast Guardsmen with Port Security Unit 311, and U.S. Marines with Kilo Company, 3rd Battalion, 4th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division, conduct an amphibious raid on a simulated enemy port during ARCTIC EDGE 2025 (AE25) at Port Mackenzie, Alaska, Aug. 13, 2025. The raid was conducted to demonstrate joint-service interoperability in an austere environment. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Earik Barton)

Keep in mind that something like this could be in the toolbox in a future conflict.

Capable of 45 knots on a pair of inboard diesels, the TPSBs carry two .50 cals and two M240B GPMGs. Girded with ballistic panels, they have shock-mitigating seats and can carry as many as eight passengers in addition to a four-man crew. It looks like each carried a half-squad or so of Marines. Each PSU has six TPSBs, allowing a theoretical raid force of 72, exclusive of crews.

The boats have an over-the-horizon capability and range of 238nm, meaning they can be used as an easily deployable blocking/interdiction force in a littoral if needed.

HITRON hits 1K

Finally, the U.S. Coast Guard’s Jacksonville-based Helicopter Interdiction Tactical Squadron (HITRON) achieved a significant milestone in its counter-drug mission, completing its 1,000th interdiction of suspected narco-trafficking vessels on 25 August.

Since its founding in 1999, HITRON has interdicted $33.2 billion in illicit drugs during operations in the Eastern Pacific Ocean and Caribbean Sea, and over the past 26 years, it has averaged one interdiction every nine days.

Not bad numbers for less than 200 Coasties, including reservists and auxiliaries, and a dozen MH-65E Dolphins, whose base airframes are 40 years old!

Coast Guard crews from the Coast Guard Helicopter Interdiction Tactical Squadron, Coast Guard Tactical Law Enforcement Team – South, Coast Guard Cutter Midgett (WMSL 757), helicopter tie-down members, and unmanned aerial vehicle personnel pose for a group photo aboard Midgett from behind three bullet-damaged outboard engine cowlings while underway in the Eastern Pacific Ocean, Aug. 28, 2025. On Aug. 25, HITRON used airborne use of force to stop the non-compliant vessel, marking the unit’s 1,000th drug interdiction since the unit’s inception in 1999, which resulted in Midgett crew members seizing approximately 3,606 pounds of suspected cocaine worth an estimated $46 million and apprehending six suspected narco-traffickers. (U.S. Coast Guard photo)

Red Devil Crusaders

With the 100th anniversary of the Red Devils recently, these two great images from its bad old Crusader Days in Vietnam felt appropriate. While the F-8 was a gunfighter built for speed, when used as a low altitude strike aircraft, it took heavy losses.

Official caption “Poised for Action: An ordnance-laden F-8E Crusader jet of Marine All-Weather Fighter Squadron 232 [VMF (AW)-232] stands ready on the Marine Aircraft Group 11 [MAG-11] flight line (official USMC photo by T. J. Mercurio).” From the Jonathan Abel Collection (COLL/3611), Marine Corps Archives & Special Collections.

“On the Way: An F-8E Crusader jet of Marine All Weather Attack Squadron 232 [VMF (AW)-232] launches on a scramble mission in support of Marine ground forces south of Da Nang (official USMC photo by Staff Sergeant Bill Fisher).” From the Jonathan Abel Collection (COLL/3611), Marine Corps Archives & Special Collections.

The above airframe, Bu150316, WT Red 17, was damaged by ground fire over South Vietnam on 4 May 4  1967. The plane made it to the South China Sea, where the pilot (Major Edward F. Townley) ejected and was rescued by a helicopter.

As noted by the unit history:

The squadron, flying the newer F-8E Crusader, which it received in August 1966, began full combat operations in December. The F-8E was similar to the F-8D but with higher-performance radar, which, being mounted in the nose section, changed the appearance slightly.

By the end of the month, VMF(AW)-232 had flown 571 sorties while delivering 418 tons of ordnance to enemy targets; four aircraft had received hits, and the Red Devil pilots had become familiar with the I and H Corps area as well as portions of the area north of the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ).

During the first 4 months of 1967, 19 more F-8Es were hit. In most cases, the damage was caused by a single small arms round and was easily repaired. Most importantly, no pilots were injured, but in May and June, the Red Devils were not quite as fortunate.

On 4 May, Major Edward F. Townley’s jet was hit as it circled over a suspected enemy position. Soon, the fighter was heading seaward, trailing fire and smoke. Major Townley was ejected and recovered uninjured.

On the 19th, the first Red Devil was killed in action, and the squadron lost its second aircraft. While flying a direct air support mission, Captain Harold J. Hellbach reported receiving fire over the target area. As the pilot turned toward the sea, the jet suddenly pitched nose up and then entered a dive, exploding when it hit the ground about 6 miles from the target area.

On 21 June, Major Charles L. Cronkrite, who, after his transfer from 232 to the group staff, continued flying with the Red Devils, was killed. After experiencing mechanical difficulties, Major Cronkrite ejected, and “it was suspected that the pilot was unconscious when he hit the water.”

July was a better month in that no one was killed or injured, but one aircraft was lost on the 2nd when Major Bruce A. Martin ejected after his plane was hit.

Two other F-8s were destroyed on 15 July as a result of an enemy rocket attack on Da Nang.

August marked the last month of the unit’s combat tour, and on the 30th, when the last plane landed, the Red Devils had amassed totals of 5,785 sorties, 7,273 flight hours, and 6,271 tons of ordnance expended.

The Red Devils received their first two-seater F-4B/J Phantoms on 19 September 1967 and, as VMFA-232, deployed with them back to Vietnam in March 1969.

Navy goes huge on APKWS II

One of the big takeaways from the off and on two-year fight with the Iranian-backed Houthis in the Bab-el-Mandeb is that the AGR-20 Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System, or APKWS, is damned handy.

Taking your basic Becky level unguided Hydra 70 2.75-inch rocket (which is fundamentally just an update of the WWII era Mk 4/Mk 40 “Might Mouse” Folding-Fin Aerial Rocket), and adding a Distributed Aperture Semi-Active Laser Seeker (DASALS) laser guidance kit, the APKWS suddenly turns into a 33-pound laser-guided precision-kill munition with a 10-pound HE warhead and a “published range” of 11,500 yards.

Plus, they are cheap, at about $30K a pop, which is peanuts for guided ordnance, running a third the cost of even bulk buy Hellfires. Then consider an AIM-9X Sidewinder costs $1.3 million.

And, besides the traditional rotary-wing (AH-1W, UH-1Y, MH-60S/R) and Harrier platforms in USMC/USN service, it has been vetted on the F-18C/D loaded in twin seven-cell LAU-68 F/A pods since 2018.

The USAF has been going APKWS heavy in recent months, with both F-16s and F-15s photographed with six LAU-131A pods, giving them 42 rockets on tap with extra pylons left over for Sidewinders, targeting pods, and fuel tanks.

Several have returned from deployment with drone “kills” stenciled on their sides, which is a telltale of lessons learned.

F-15E from the 389th FS “Thunderbolts” carrying six LAU-131A rocket pods

Further, L3 Harris has the super low-cost Vampire SAM SHORAD system, which uses quad-packed APKWS that can be mounted on a truck or small (think 25-foot) boat or USV.

It has been very useful in Ukraine.

And don’t even forget to mention the recent tests at Dugway Proving Grounds by BAE of a small (250 pounds, with half that being payload) Malloy TRV-150 UAV VTOL air cargo drone (which is being trialed by the Marines for carrying “Speedball” style battlefield resupply packets) paired with an APKWS.

So you see, between much more use in counter-drone work via F-18s and MH-60s, traditional ground support work by AH-1s and UH-1s, potential use as bolt-on SHORAD systems for assets like LCS and LPDs, and use in UAVs and USVs, the Navy wants a whole lot more APKWS on hand (with extras for the Army and friends overseas), because you never know.

Yesterday’s contract announcement (emphasis mine):

BAE Systems Information and Electronic Warfare Systems, Hudson, New Hampshire, is awarded a $1,743,038,000 firm-fixed-price, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for the production and delivery of up to 55,000 Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System II Full Rate Production Lots 13-17 in support of upgrading the current 2.75-inch Rocket System to a semi-active laser guided precision weapon for the Navy, Army, and Foreign Military Sales customers. Work will be performed in Hudson, New Hampshire (31%); Whippany, New Jersey (22%); Plymouth, United Kingdom (16%); Austin, Texas (7%); Bristol, Pennsylvania (3%); Rochester, New York (3%); Kitchener, Ontario, Canada (2%); Westminster, Maryland (2%); Ronan, Montana (2%); Topsfield, Massachusetts (2%); Pomfret, Connecticut (2%); Danbury, Connecticut (2%); Anaheim, California (1%); Tempe, Arizona (1%); Ipswich, Massachusetts (1%); Centennial, Colorado (1%); Carson, California (1%); and Boston, Massachusetts (1%), and is expected to be in completed December 2031. No funds will be obligated at the time of award, funds will be obligated on individual orders as they are issued. This contract was not competed. Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Maryland, is the contracting activity (N0001925D0018).

Warship Wednesday, August 27, 2025: A Tour of the Bay

Here at LSOZI, we take off every Wednesday for a look at the old steam/diesel navies of the 1833-1954 period and will profile a different ship each week. These ships have a life, a tale all their own, which sometimes takes them to the strangest places.- Christopher Eger

If you enjoy my always ad-free Warship Wednesday content, you can support it by buying me a cup of joe at https://buymeacoffee.com/lsozi As Henk says: “Warship Coffee – no sugar, just a pinch of salt!”

Warship Wednesday, August 27, 2025: A Tour of the Bay

Photo by Sub-Lieutenant E R Jones, Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve, Imperial War Museum catalog # A 30447

Above we see the “battle bowler” clad Lt. R M Howe, DSC, RN, explaining the plan of landing to his platoon of armed sailors and Royal Marines drawn from British Pacific Fleet warships before they disembark from the Buckley-class destroyer escort turned high-speed transport USS Sims (APD-50) into waiting LCVP landing craft to occupy the Japanese Coastal Forts at the entrance to Tokyo Bay on the morning of 30 August 1945, some 80 years ago this month. The item over Howe’s shoulder is one of Sim’s davits.

Knowing the background of the escort’s namesake, the joint operation should be of no surprise.

The Buckleys

With some 154 hulls ordered, the Buckleys were intended to be cranked out in bulk to counter the swarms of Axis submarines prowling the seas.

Just 306 feet overall, they were about the size of a medium-ish Coast Guard cutter today but packed a lot more armament, namely three 3″/50 DP guns in open mounts, a secondary battery of 1.1-inch (or 40mm), and 20mm AAA guns, and three 21-inch torpedo tubes in a triple mount for taking out enemy surface ships.

Buckley-class-destroyer-escort-1944 USS England by Dr. Dan Saranga via Blueprints

Then there was the formidable ASW suite to include stern depth charge racks, eight depth charge throwers, and a Hedgehog system.

Powered by responsive electric motors fed by steam turbines, they could make 24 knots and were extremely maneuverable.

Class-leader, USS Buckley (DE-51), cutting a 20-knot, 1,000-foot circle on trials off Rockland, Maine, 3 July 1943, 80-G-269442

Meet Sims

Our ship was the second greyhound named after ADM William Sowden Sims (USNA 1880), the Canadian-born officer who commanded all United States naval forces operating in Europe during the Great War.

He was the epitome of a “joint warrior” before such a thing was in vogue, often bending over backwards to keep his British and French allies happy.

Our humble ship followed the path blazed by a pre-war destroyer, the Bath-built USS Sims (DD-409), which commissioned on 1 August 1939.

USS Sims (DD-409) Off the Kennebec River, Maine, during her builder’s trials, 6 July 1939. Photograph from the Bureau of Ships Collection in the U.S. National Archives. 19-N-20822

After neutrality patrols, DD-409 was sent to the Pacific and became part of TF 17, the screen for the famed carrier USS Yorktown. She was with Yorktown at the Battle of the Coral Sea and took seven bomb hits and a dived Japanese plane to the stern, sent to the bottom after a magazine explosion that left but 13 survivors.

The second Sims was laid down on 7 September 1942 at the Norfolk Navy Yard and launched five months later, sponsored by Mrs. Anne Erwin Sims (nee Hitchcock), the widow of the late Admiral Sims. She had also sponsored the DD-409 four years prior.

Sims and her sister USS Reuben James (DE-153) were the only members of their class to carry the same armament as Buckley, to include a quad 28mm/75 Mk 1 “Chicago Piano” instead of a more effective twin or quad 40mm Bofors mount. The rest of the armament included the same triple 3″/50 DP singles in open, largely unprotected mounts, six 20mm Oerlikons, three 21-inch torpedo tubes, a Hedgehog Mk 10 ASWRL, and an impressive depth charge array.

Sims was commissioned on 24 April 1943 and was soon put to work.

Fighting U-boats across the Atlantic

4 October 1943, USS Sims moored at Pier C of the Brooklyn Navy Yard with the newly commissioned USS Reybold (DE 177) tied up on her port side. Sims had arrived in the Navy Yard on 28 September for scheduled maintenance and repair between convoys. 19LCM-dd68

USS Sims (DE 154) in New York Harbor, 17 April 1944, with a commercial barge and harbor tug alongside. 19-N-64416

USS Sims (DE 154) in New York Harbor, 17 April 1944, with a commercial barge and harbor tug alongside. 19-N-64418

A great stern shot at the same location and date as above, showing off the details of her ASW gear to include two chock-full Mk9 depth charge racks and eight Mk6 K-gun projectors. 19-N-64419

USS Sims (DE-154) in New York Harbor, 17 April 1944. Note the quad 1.1-inch “Chicago Piano” AAA mount just past her stern, No. 3, 3″/50, and her triple Mk15 torpedo tube turnstile amidships. 19-N-64417

After fitting out, Sims completed her shakedown cruise off Bermuda and then was assigned to Task Group (TG) 21.6, tasked with escorting vital tankers in large “CU” convoys from Curacao in the Dutch East Indies (later New York), across the Atlantic to Londonderry/Liverpool, with the return reverse runs being dubbed “UC” convoys.

She made 20 of these runs between July 1943 and September 1944, typically with at least five other DD/DEs:

  • CU 003 (11/07/43-24/07/43)
  • UC 003A (30/07/43-10/08/43)
  • CU 004 (26/08/43 09/09/43)
  • UC 004 (15/09/43-27/09/43)
  • CU 005 (13/10/43-24/10/43)
  • UC 005 (30/10/43-09/11/43)
  • CU 008 (02/12/43-13/12/43)
  • UC 008 (18/12/43-02/01/44)
  • CU 012 (19/01/44-30/01/44)
  • UC 012 (07/02/44-18/02/44)
  • CU 017 (10/03/44-20/03/44)
  • UC 017 (27/03/44-07/04/44)
  • CU 022 (24/04/44 06/05/44)
  • UC 022 (10/05/44-20/05/44)
  • CU 027 (08/06/44-18/06/44)
  • UC 027 (23/06/44-04/07/44)
  • CU 032 (19/07/44-29/07/44)
  • UC 032 (03/08/44-14/08/44)
  • CU 037 (27/08/44-07/09/44)
  • UC 037 (12/09/44-23/09/44)

The toughest of these was CU-17, a ten-day West-East slog from New York to Liverpool in March 1944. Shipping out with 22 merchantmen, mostly tankers but with the addition of the troop-filled U.S. Army Transport George S. Simonds, six tin cans, and the Bouge/Attacker class jeep carrier HMS Premier (D23), escorted the convoy.

The only convoy that Sims rode shotgun on that lost a ship, on 19 March, just West of Lands’ End, the German Type VIIC submarine U-311 (Kptlt. Joachim Zander) somehow found itself among the convoy and fired fish into the armed American tanker SS Seakay (10,342 tons), with one of her Navy Guard members killed. Wallowing, she was evacuated and later sent to the bottom with 14,000 tons of vapor oil and 14 aircraft (stored on deck).

Sims and her fellow greyhound pursued Zander and his U-boat relentlessly, but to no avail.

From Sim’s report:

Instead, Zander was boxed in by the Canadian frigates HMCS Matane and HMCS Swansea southwest of Ireland a few weeks later, and U-311 was sent to the bottom, with all hands. Seakay had been the sub’s (and Zander’s) only victim.

USS Sims (DE-154) Underway at sea, circa 1944. NH 107614

Sent to take on the Emperor

Sims became one of the most well-traveled of her class. Whereas most either served in the Atlantic or the Pacific during WWII, Sims got plenty of both.

On 23 September 1944, Sims entered the Boston Navy Yard for conversion into a high-speed transport, or APD. This resulted in her landing all her 3-inch guns, her torpedo tubes, her Hedgehogs, and her K-guns (leaving the stern depth charge racks). She gained a single 5″/38 Mk 12 mount forward as well as two twin 40mm Bofors. Also added were large davits supporting four 36-foot LCVP Higgins boats, and her crew berthing was modified to carry 162 troops in cramped, temporary conditions, even for the 1940s.

Clad in mottled green Measure 31 camouflage, she became a “Green Dragon.” The Navy wanted to convert 50 Buckleys to this spec, but only managed 37 before the end of the war.

The work completed, Sims (now APD-50) departed Boston on 6 December 1944 for Norfolk, where she was used as an amphibious training ship near Little Creek for the next seven weeks.

Shipping out for the Pacific, she arrived at Pearl Harbor on 20 February 1945.

U.S. Navy high-speed transport USS Sims (APD-50) at anchor, circa 1945. She is painted in Camouflage Measure 31, Design 20L. Note her davits and single 5-inch gun. Photo via Navsource

Moving forward for the Okinawa landings, Sims was assigned to TF 51 (CTG 51.5) and on 27 March 1945 sailed from Leyte as an escort for Transport Group Dog. She spent most of the next month supporting the landings, performing ASW patrols, scanning for frequent enemy air attacks, sinking floating mines with gunfire, and rescuing souls at sea (Ensign E.G. Johnson, blown off the cargo ship USS Tyrell on 2 April). During this period, Sims fired 64 rounds of 5-inch, 731 of 40mm, and 1,002 of 20mm, claiming two enemy aircraft downed.

In May, she became the flagship of Capt. J.M. Kennaday, USN, Commander of Transport Division 105, continued more of the same.

The work was hazardous in the extreme.

During a six-week stint off Okinawa, no less than 10 Buckleys were damaged by Japanese aircraft and kamikazes, including one, USS England, which was so heavily damaged that she was never repaired. An 11th, USS Gendreau, was severely damaged by Japanese coastal guns during the same period. Sims was one of these 11, having fought off two kamikazes on 24 May whose near misses remarkably left her with only some popped seams, an oil leak, and 11 injured, four seriously.

A 12th Buckley, USS Bates, was sunk when she was hit by a cluster of three kamikazes at Okinawa on 25 May 1945.

The same day that Bates sank, Sims went to the aid of the damaged, burning, and abandoned USS Barry (APD-29), an old Clemson-class destroyer turned Green Dragon. A volunteer DC boarding party of two officers and 10 men from Sims went aboard and extinguished the blaze in a little over two hours. Later towed to Kerama Retto to be used as a decoy for the kamikazes, the unmanned Barry was sunk there on June 21 by suicide planes.

Meanwhile, Sims returned to Leyte via Saipan in early June to effect repairs, then was back on the line off Okinawa on the 26th, returning to service as Kennaday’s flag. In her stint off Okinawa in May, she fired 32 rounds of 5-inch, 575 rounds of 40mm, and 516 rounds of 20mm in anti-air operations.

Kennaday provided the following accolades:

Tokyo Bay

On 13 August, Sims, with Kennaday aboard, proceeded to Buckner Bay for supplies, then the next morning left with five other APDs– USS Barr, Pavlic, Bass, Wantuck, and Runels, to form Task Unit 30.3.6, shifting to Third Fleet command. The task: prepare for the Tokyo Bay Occupation. 

British Pacific Fleet elements attached to the Third Fleet organized a light company-sized landing force– of 22 officers and 120 enlisted, mixed Royal Marines and Tars– to occupy the coastal forts and batteries ringing Sagami Bay, located south of Tokyo Bay, and the island of Azuma.

Sims was detailed as their chariot, and on 20 August, she dispatched her landing craft alongside the battleship HMS King George V, and the Australian destroyers HMAS Nizam and HMAS Napier. The men collected from KGV included a contingent of Kiwi sailors from the cruiser HMNZS Gambia that had been cross-decked to the battlewagon. The force also included a team of Commonwealth war correspondents, which means the images of the event made it into the Imperial War Museum and the Australian War Memorial.

HMS King George V, with LCVPs headed to USS Sims

At sea off Japan, 20 August 1945. Members of the British Landing Force embarking from HMS King George V for USS Sims, which was to ferry them ashore. Sub Lieutenant Leary of HMAS Nizam is in the foreground. (Photographer Capt. J. C. Goodchild). AWM 121207

Sagami Bay, Japan. c. September 1945. LCDR George R. Davis-Goff RNZN, from the cruiser  HMNZS Gambia, is addressing men of the British Landing Force on the quarterdeck of their transport USS Sims, only a few hundred yards from the shores of Sagami Bay. The white flag flying on the point in the background denotes the position of a gun emplacement surrendered by the enemy. AWM 019231

A chow line on Sims. Note the beret-clad Royal Marines contrasting against the assorted Commonwealth sailors

The enlisted Commonwealth contingents were excited about the landing as the tars escaped an all-hands call to paint their ships’ upperworks in an effort to remove the signs that the ships had been at sea for a long time. Plus, they were the tip of the occupation force.

Sagami Bay, Japan. Australian Naval personnel took the first snapshots of the Japanese mainland as seen from the decks of their transport USS Sims. There was a rush for cameras to record souvenirs of their first glimpse of the enemy’s territory, as the ship drew near the shores of Sagami Bay. Pictured, left to right: Leading Seaman Ken Edgerton of Orange, NSW; Able Seaman (Ab) Bob Skinner of Underdale, SA; AB Cliff Howard of Alberton East, SA; AB Colin Llewellyn of Cooroy, Qld; AB Bill Ives of Bathurst, NSW, and kneeling, AB Bruce Hazard of Caulfield, Vic. All are members of the destroyer HMAS Napier. AWM 019429

At sea off Japan, 1945-08-27. British landing force personnel on the forecastle of the destroyer USS Sims. Note her new 5″/38. (Photographer, Captain J. C. Goodchild) AWM 121192

New Zealand sailors, comprising part of the British Landing Force, lined up on the quarterdeck of their transport USS Sims before landing on Yokosuka, the largest naval base in Japan, situated in Tokyo Bay. In the background can be seen the gutted Japanese battleship Nagato, once a powerful flagship of the Japanese Navy. A carrier-based plane can also be seen flying overhead. AWM 019233

Capt. Herbert James Buchanan, DSO, RAN, who oversaw the British landing force, watching the party preparing to disembark from Sims. Buchannan, an Australian who joined the Navy as a cadet in 1915, earned his DSO at Dunkirk after his command, the destroyer HMS Valentine, was bombed and sunk by Junkers 87 Stuka dive bombers, leaving him and his crew ashore to organize beach control parties during the evacuation. He had later commanded the destroyers HMS Vanity and HMAS Norman and Napier, the latter of which brought him to Tokyo Bay, IWM (A 30445)

British platoons on the deck of the Sims are preparing to go ashore. IWM (A 30446)

Landing party disembarking from USS Sims to LCVPs IWM (A 30448).

And in the Higgins boats. IWM (A 30449)

The British landing party from USS Sims is taking over one of the Japanese forts. IWM A 30450

Continuing her work with the Occupation Forces, on 30 August, working with fellow APD USS Pavlic, Sims embarked Love Company, 3rd Battalion, 4th Marines Regiment, under Major Wallace L. Crawford, and landed them first on Green Beach in Tokyo Bay then, reembarking them on 1 September, took them to Tateyama Naval Air Station on the northeastern shore of Sagami Wan to accept its surrender, reconnoiter the beach approaches for follow-on Army troops, and to make sure the Japanese aircraft there were disabled. Importantly, the “Old Fourth” had been chosen for this task by MacArthur as the regiment had been part of the 1942 Bataan Campaign.

Following the official surrender ceremony on 2 September, Sims brought L/3/4 back to Green Beach on 3 September once they were relieved at Tateyama by the Eighth Army’s 112th Cavalry Regiment.

Sims continued to operate in Japanese waters for the next three months before being ordered stateside, arriving at San Diego with 208 assorted GI and Navy passengers on 17 December, just in time for Christmas.

For her 20 convoys, pursuit of U-317, Okinawa actions, and Tokyo Bay mission, she earned a grand total of one battle star.

Cold War mothballs

Sims was sent through the Panama Canal, destined to be decommissioned at Green Cove Springs, Florida, on 24 April 1946, and was then placed in the Atlantic Reserve Fleet.

Beyond the 37 APD conversions, the Navy converted others of the class, including USS Foss, Marsh, Wiseman, and Whitehurst, which were rigged as power supply ships with two large reels for power cables amidships.

Seven others became radar pickets (DER) with the addition of large air search radar sets on a second mast, while USS Cronin, Frybarger, and Raby were redesignated DEC (escort vessels, control) to guide landing craft to beaches. USS Vammen was converted to a DE (A/S) for testing new anti-submarine warfare sensors and weapons, while USS Francis M. Robinson, Jack W. Wilke, and Malay became EDEs (experimental destroyer escorts) for a time for much the same purpose.

Of the 46 Buckleys loaned to the Royal Navy during the war as the Captain-class, six were lost. Of the USN-operated vessels, USS Fechteler and Underhill were lost in action, as was one wartime APD conversion, USS Bates (APD 47, ex-DE 68).

The Navy retained nearly 100 Buckleys of all types on the Navy List into the early 1960s– but most were in mothballs– and then began whittling them down, with some transferred and the rest scrapped or sunk (12) as targets.

Jane’s 1960 APDs converted destroyer escorts, of both the Buckley and other classes, with Sims listed as a 1960 disposal.

The final Buckley on active duty with the Navy was Wiseman, decommissioned in 1965, while some were retained as pier-side naval reserve training ships as late as 1969. The last five members of the class were removed from Navy custody in 1974– not a bad run for “disposable” ships.

The Navy deleted the “DE” classification in 1975.

Sims, hulked, was sold to the North American Smelting Co. of Wilmington, Delaware, on 14 April 1961 and scrapped.

In a perhaps poignant touch, ADM Sims’ widow, Anne, passed in 1960, the year before the second destroyer to carry his name was sold for scrap. She was 85 and was buried next to her husband at Arlington National Cemetery. The U.S. Naval War College Archives maintain the Sims’ papers.

Epilogue

Today, little remains of Sims other than her logs and reports in the National Archives. 

Lt Howe, pictured in the first photo, became a regular and retired from the Royal Navy in April 1958 as an LCDR.

Capt. Buchanan, the Dunkirk hero who commanded the Commonwealth landing force that occupied Yokosuka and the Tokyo Bay coastal forts from the deck of Sims, joined the staff of Admiral Sir Louis Hamilton. He then later commanded the cruisers HMAS Shropshire and Australia. He received a CBE and retired as a rear admiral in 1957 and passed in Sydney in 1965, aged 63.

Post-war, the Navy recycled our ship’s name for the new Knox-class destroyer escort USS W. S. Sims (DE-1059, later FF-1059), commissioned in 1970. She served 21 honorable years and was decommissioned in 1991, then later transferred to Turkey for use as a floating spare parts platform for that NATO ally’s surplus Knoxes.

USS W.S. Sims (FF-1059) underway in the Mediterranean Sea, June 1987. Photographer: PH2 Hensley. DNSC8709254. National Archives Identifier 6418455

It is beyond past time for a new destroyer, the fourth, to carry the name Sims.

Meminisse est ad Vivificandum – To Remember is to Keep Alive

***

If you like this column, please consider joining the International Naval Research Organization (INRO), Publishers of Warship International

They are possibly one of the best sources of naval study, images, and fellowship you can find. http://www.warship.org/membership.htm

The International Naval Research Organization is a non-profit corporation dedicated to the encouragement of the study of naval vessels and their histories, principally in the era of iron and steel warships (about 1860 to date). Its purpose is to provide information and a means of contact for those interested in warships.

With more than 50 years of scholarship, Warship International, the written tome of the INRO, has published hundreds of articles, most of which are unique in their sweep and subject.

PRINT still has its place. If you LOVE warships, you should belong.

I’m a member, so should you be!

Red Devils Mark a Century

U.S. Marines with Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 232, Marine Aircraft Group 11, 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing, stand in formation during a centennial ceremony at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, California, Aug. 15, 2025. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. Samantha Devine) 250815-M-YL719-1079

The 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing, earlier this month, celebrated the 100th anniversary of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 232 “Red Devils,” an F/A-18C/D Super Hornet squadron with Marine Aircraft Group 11, during a commemorative ceremony aboard MCAS Miramar. It is the Marine Corps’ oldest active fighter attack squadron.

The squadron was established as VF-3M on 1 September 1925, at NAS San Diego, and its long combat history began less than two years later when the squadron’s Boeing FB Hawk single-seat biplanes provided reconnaissance and air support to Gen. Smedley Butler’s 3rd Brigade in Teintsin. Their ersatz mud field was about 35 miles from the city, and the ground crew had to provide their own security against bandits and warlords. The squadron nonetheless logged 3,818 sorties in support of the 3rd Brigade over 18 months.

The “Red Devils,” later flying SBD dive bombers as VMSB-232, became the first flying squadron to land on Guadalcanal’s Henderson Field on 20 August 1942 during World War II and made history as part of the Cactus Air Force, earning two presidential citations during the war.

Wreckage of an SBD scout-bomber, still burning after it was destroyed by a Japanese air attack on Henderson Field, Guadalcanal, 1942. Official U.S. Navy Photograph, now in the collections of the National Archives. Catalog #: 80-G-14409

When it left Henderson two months later, only one of the original 15 Guadalcanal Red Devils was still walking.

Marine Torpedo Bombing Squadron 232 Insignia, circa 1942, Guadalcanal, where they specialized in paving Iron Bottom Sound with Japanese ships/The drawing was done by I.F. Waldgovel in 1983.

Then came Korea (the squadron itself did not deploy, but all of its original pilots and 40 percent of its enlisted were sent overseas as replacements), two tours in Vietnam, numerous carrier deployments, 740 combat missions in Desert Storm, etc. It later became the first F-18 squadron to land in Afghanistan in 2010 during Operation Enduring Freedom.

Over the past century, the squadron has flown 15 different aircraft (including TBM Avengers, F6F Hellcats, F4U Corsairs, FJ Furys, F-8 Crusaders, and F-4 Phantoms) and participated in every major (and many minor) U.S. conflicts.

The legacy aircraft figure will soon be updated to 16, as it is slated to move to F-35Cs in the next few years.

A U.S. Marine Corps F/A-18D Hornet, serving as the color bird for Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 232, Marine Aircraft Group 11, 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing, is staged in the hangar during a centennial ceremony at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, California, Aug. 15, 2025. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. Samantha Devine)

« Older Entries Recent Entries »